search for: riski

Hi there, Domaincontroller name: risky.home.schinz.de dig dig @risky -tANY risky.home.schinz.de. returns: ;; ANSWER SECTION: risky.home.schinz.de. 900 IN A 10.0.180.254 risky.home.schinz.de. 900 IN AAAA ::1 I have a strange behavior in my network. It's only concerning DNS, but maybe someone can help me. If a do a ssh on risky from another machine (exact command:

Hai, Sorry for the late reply, but yes, this is a risky move. Did you make sure this the DOMAIN SID's are exact the same between old and new servers? This: rsync -av --progress --xattrs --rsh=ssh Does not copy the (windows) acl's. Look at https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Bidirectional_Rsync/Unison_based_SysVol_replication_workaround Howto to this with rsync and unison, the

On Jan 5, 2010, at 1:38 PM, David Greene wrote: > I don't think there's a flag that says "don't do anything risky, > ever." "Don't do anything risky with floating-point" is the default mode. If you're aware of any unsafe floating-point optimizations being done by default, please file a bug. > For example, a gfortran-fronted LLVM should have a way

On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 10:43:03AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > > On 2018/12/13 ??10:31, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > Just to make sure I understand this. It looks to me we should: > > > > > > - allow passing GIOVA->GPA through UAPI > > > > > > - cache GIOVA->GPA somewhere but still use GIOVA->HVA in device IOTLB for > > >

On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 10:43:03AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > > On 2018/12/13 ??10:31, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > Just to make sure I understand this. It looks to me we should: > > > > > > - allow passing GIOVA->GPA through UAPI > > > > > > - cache GIOVA->GPA somewhere but still use GIOVA->HVA in device IOTLB for > > >

OK, now i've to start to move the big part of my users from my old NT-like domains to my new AD domain. I've setup roaming profile in the new domain following the wiki (https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Roaming_Windows_User_Profiles, 'using windows ACL') and for new profiles works like a charm. But i've tried to move/copy old profile to the new domain, and seems work, with

Hello Everyone, We have centos6 server. And we are planning to upgrade it to Centos7.And GRUB 2 needs a new bios grub partition. Creating a new partition is too much risky. I am wondering if it is possible to replace Grub2 with Grub legacy on Centos7 machine? Thanks!! Sachin

Further to my messages back in May I have at last got round to trying to get my DomU to recognise USB devices. I am using Xen 4.6 with CentOS kernel 3.18.34-20.el7.x86_64. I have to manually make the port available before creating the DomU by issuing the command: xl pci-assignable-add 00:1a.0 otherwise nothing shows in: xl pci-assignable-list I have added this to my .cfg file as per the

Just sharing an experience with you all -- hopefully you take better precautions than I do. :-) I have a few sites built with Rails 0.8.3 that were ugpraded to 1.0. The newer sites are on edge rails. So when I heard 1.1 had come out, I unfroze my new apps, and installed the new gem for Rails 1.1. The sites that was operating on edge rails worked just fine. However, the sites that were working

Hi, I have a daemon process which is changings things in the system only the superuser should be allowed to change. Lets call it "riskyd". Users use a frontend on the same machine (lets call it "risky"). risky is a SUID program which talks to riskyd by binding to a privileged port, then connecting to riskyd on localhost. riskyd cheks that the connection is coming from

On Tuesday 05 January 2010 15:57, Dan Gohman wrote: > On Jan 5, 2010, at 1:38 PM, David Greene wrote: > > I don't think there's a flag that says "don't do anything risky, > > ever." > > "Don't do anything risky with floating-point" is the default mode. If > you're aware of any unsafe floating-point optimizations being done by >

All, I'm requesting comments from the expert readers of ext3-users on these notes for tuning ext3 for performance. Most helpful would be feedback pertinent to RHEL 5; as XFS isn't supported under Red Hat Enterprise Linux these items are an attempt to match XFS performance with ext3. These items were culled from a number of sources. Will they be effective for achieving the performance

Hi all. I have never implemented online payment and it''s the only thing that keeps me from accepting a project for a UK based client. (I must reply quickly!) While I can afford spending an extra week - or 2 - to learn/try/tune the payment system, I must be sure to succeed before I accept the contract. If you''ve already been through that path, any hints, links and/or

I'm dying to use the 1.0 capability to use more than one mysql user pasword database. However, I'm too chicken to use 1.0-test in a production environment. Does anyone know if there is a planned release date for 1.0? Or can anyone say how risky it is to use 1.0-test?

More information... I have pcifront showing as a module in the DomU and the usb shows in dmesg as: [ 3.167543] usbcore: registered new interface driver usbfs [ 3.167563] usbcore: registered new interface driver hub [ 3.167585] usbcore: registered new device driver usb [ 3.196056] usb usb1: New USB device found, idVendor=1d6b, idProduct=0002 [ 3.196060] usb usb1: New USB device strings:

> On Thu, Apr 09, 2020 at 11:06:45AM +0200, Nicolas Kovacs wrote: >> Which leads me to the more general question of: enable CR on a >> production >> server, yes or no? > > Not on production. Only for testing. I'm not sure. Running production environments without CR enabled means you're running without current security updates for quite some time. Seems a bad

On 8/5/20 7:48 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > See comment in code and > https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2020-August/msg00023.html > --- > plugins/vddk/vddk.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- > 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) I'll have to trust your testing, but code-wise, this looks safe. -- Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer Red

I noticed that the apache rpm httpd-2.2.3-11.el5_1.centos.3.src.rpm has a bug in mod_expires. https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39774 Please forgive a dumb question: how risky would using a Fedora httpd RPM be on a CentOS5 install? Jed

Hello, I am writing a JIT compiler for a subset of the Matlab language and as a part of my implementation, I would like to be able to pass a constant pointer to a native function I'm calling. Right now, this is what I do: llvm::Constant* constInt = llvm::ConstantInt::get(llvm::Type::Int64Ty, (int64)thePointer); llvm::Value* constPtr = llvm::ConstantExpr::getIntToPtr(constInt,

On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 09:55:17PM +0800, Wei Wang wrote: > The <linux/bug.h> was removed from radix-tree.h by the following commit: > f5bba9d11a256ad2a1c2f8e7fc6aabe6416b7890. > > Since that commit, tools/testing/radix-tree/ couldn't pass compilation > due to: tools/testing/radix-tree/idr.c:17: undefined reference to > WARN_ON_ONCE. This patch adds the bug.h header to