Please, disregard the message that I sent. I have since discovered
that my bandwidth actually wasn''t 1mbit (as my ISP had told me), but
actually 800kbit. That was the cause of my problems.
I''m terribly sorry for my ignorance, and hope for your forgiveness.
Fredrik Tolf
Fredrik Tolf writes:
> Hi!
>
> I recently changed my qdisc from CBQ and PRIO to only HTB, and I
can''t
> really seem to get the rates to work as I want them to. I have eight
> classes, which I set up as follows:
>
> tc qdisc add dev eth1 root handle 1: htb default 122
> tc class add dev eth1 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 1000kbit ceil
1000kbit cburst 1500 burst 50kb
> tc class add dev eth1 parent 1:1 classid 1:11 htb prio 0 rate 25kbit ceil
50kbit burst 10kbit
> tc class add dev eth1 parent 1:1 classid 1:12 htb prio 1 rate 400kbit ceil
1000kbit burst 10kb
> tc class add dev eth1 parent 1:1 classid 1:13 htb prio 1 rate 150kbit ceil
1000kbit burst 50kb
> tc class add dev eth1 parent 1:1 classid 1:14 htb prio 1 rate 400kbit ceil
1000kbit burst 10kb
> tc class add dev eth1 parent 1:1 classid 1:15 htb prio 2 rate 25kbit ceil
500kbit burst 10kb
> tc class add dev eth1 parent 1:12 classid 1:121 htb prio 1 rate 300kbit
ceil 1000kbit
> tc class add dev eth1 parent 1:12 classid 1:122 htb prio 1 rate 100kbit
ceil 1000kbit
> tc filter add dev eth1 parent 1: protocol ip prio 1 handle 1 fw flowid
1:15
> tc filter add dev eth1 parent 1: protocol ip prio 2 handle 2 fw flowid
1:14
> tc filter add dev eth1 parent 1: protocol ip prio 3 u32 match ip tos 0x10
0x1e flowid 1:11
> tc filter add dev eth1 parent 1: protocol ip prio 3 u32 match ip tos 0x08
0x1e flowid 1:121
> tc filter add dev eth1 parent 1: protocol ip prio 3 u32 match ip sport 80
0xffff flowid 1:13
>
> (Sorry for the long lines)
>
> Along with these iptables rules in the mangle table:
> -A POSTROUTING -m tos --tos 0x1e -j MARK --set-mark 0x1
> -A POSTROUTING -m tos --tos 0x1e -j TOS --set-tos 0x00
> -A POSTROUTING -m owner --cmd-owner vsftpd -j MARK --set-mark 0x2
>
> As you can see, one of the things I''m trying to do is to
de-prioritize
> traffic with TOS 0x1E (I set this through iptables on other machines
> on the network for processes that belong to a certain group) - these
> packets go to class 1:15. It doesn''t work as I expect it to,
> though.
>
> In my test case, I let a friend download something from me over FTP,
> which goes through class 1:14, at the same time as I''m letting a
> multitude of TCP connections transfer data through the low priority
> class (1:15). This friend of mine has a downstream bandwidth of 512
> kbit. My upstream bandwidth, in case it is unclear, is 1
> mbit. Therefore, I would expect each to go at about 500 kbit
> each. When only one of the transfers is running alone, the correct
> bandwidth is reached. However, when both are running at the same time,
> the low priority goes at 500 kbit (its ceil), while the FTP transfer
> drops to only about 300 kbit.
>
> I have verified that everything goes through the right classes (with
> tc -s class ls), so the filters are working as they should, at least.
>
> If someone can explain this, I''d be grateful.
>
> Fredrik Tolf
>
> _______________________________________________
> LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
> http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/