klibc - Jun 2012 - To build klibc against kernel 3.4.3

It seems that a minor modification to usr/klibc/arch/$(ARCH)/MCONFIG is needed
to build klibc successfully against kernel version 3.4.3. At lease the arch
"arm" and "x86_64" have this issue. It is because that some
include files are under "generated/asm/" in addition to
"asm/".

--- a/usr/klibc/arch/x86_64/MCONFIG
+++ b/usr/klibc/arch/x86_64/MCONFIG
@@ -36,4 +36,4 @@ KLIBCLDFLAGS      = -m elf_x86_64
KLIBCSHAREDFLAGS     = -Ttext 0x00200200 -z max-page-size=0x100000

# Asm includes for x86_64 are in the merged x86 tree
-KLIBCARCHINCFLAGS = -I$(KLIBCKERNELOBJ)/arch/x86/include
+KLIBCARCHINCFLAGS = -I$(KLIBCKERNELOBJ)/arch/x86/include
-I$(KLIBCKERNELOBJ)/arch/x86/include/generated
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://www.zytor.com/pipermail/klibc/attachments/20120627/cdb4c349/attachment.html>

Cao, Da-Shi (EG-Presales-ZTE/HW-GZ) dixit:
>It seems that a minor modification to usr/klibc/arch/$(ARCH)/MCONFIG
>is needed to build klibc successfully against kernel version 3.4.3. At
>lease the arch "arm" and "x86_64" have this issue. It is
because that
>some include files are under "generated/asm/" in addition to
"asm/".
>From IRC discussion, it is clear that you cannot build klibc against
the in-tree headers but must build it against the exported headers
made my installing the headers from Linux instead. (IIUC)

bye,
//mirabilos
-- 
13:37??Natureshadow? Deep inside, I hate mirabilos. I mean, he's a good
guy. But he's always right! In every fsckin' situation, he's right.
Even
with his deeply perverted taste in software and borked ambition towards
broken OSes - in the end, he's damn right about it :(! [?] works in mksh