search for: natureshadow

...k in #nouveau on Freenode turned up that the failure is related to the EVO engine responsible for modesetting. Here are the relevant parts of that chat, more explanations follow below: 08:02 < imirkin> nouveau E[ PDISP][0000:01:00.0] chid 0 mthd 0x0080 data 0x00000000 0x000d5080 08:02 < Natureshadow> that means? 08:02 < imirkin> that's a bit unfortunate 08:02 < imirkin> dunno, gimme a min 08:02 < Natureshadow> sorry, I am not a kernel hacker ;) ... 08:03 < imirkin> oh, that's the EVO flush 08:03 < imirkin> and the d5080 is probably the fifo position or...

Commit-ID: d7d16afbdae9bdea83aeb26ac572e6fc4d7d4940 Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/?p=libs/klibc/klibc.git;a=commit;h=d7d16afbdae9bdea83aeb26ac572e6fc4d7d4940 Author: Steve McIntyre <steve at einval.com> AuthorDate: Fri, 29 Jun 2012 18:13:34 +0100 Committer: maximilian attems <max at stro.at> CommitDate: Sun, 1 Jul 2012 22:51:00 +0200 [klibc] arm/setjmp.S: fix longjmp

...that $(uname -p) matches what gcc will produce by default ? I cursed like a sailor when Apple broke that, first. Let?s not follow. So please, when running i386 builds, always do that in a (faked) i386 environment. That being said, maybe we _should_ always set ${ARCH}? bye, //mirabilos -- 13:37??Natureshadow? Deep inside, I hate mirabilos. I mean, he's a good guy. But he's always right! In every fsckin' situation, he's right. Even with his deeply perverted taste in software and borked ambition towards broken OSes - in the end, he's damn right about it :(! [?] works in mksh

It seems that a minor modification to usr/klibc/arch/$(ARCH)/MCONFIG is needed to build klibc successfully against kernel version 3.4.3. At lease the arch "arm" and "x86_64" have this issue. It is because that some include files are under "generated/asm/" in addition to "asm/". --- a/usr/klibc/arch/x86_64/MCONFIG +++ b/usr/klibc/arch/x86_64/MCONFIG @@ -36,4

Hi, is there a DD-accessible porterbox somewhere (slow would be ok, as this is smallish software) with an up-to-date sid (enough to install the recently-built libklibc-dev 2.0~rc5-1 and all other B-D of mksh 40.9.20120518-1, as well as strace and gdb-minimal)? Similarily to http://www.zytor.com/pipermail/klibc/2012-May/003229.html I found klibc-compiled programmes on Alpha to fail (SIGSEGV