Evolution has a nice feature where it can sort messages by the most recent received-by date, instead of the Date: header. This is nice, because then if something gets stuck on a server somewhere in the world for a couple of days, it shows up at the end of your mail list, instead of way back where you might miss it. However, when using dovecot with evo, if I sort of received by instead of date, it takes forever. I assume this is because date is indexed, and received by is not. So the natural question becomes, is there a way of getting dovecot to index received by? TIA. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: <http://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20040929/b79dd9ca/attachment-0001.bin>
On 30.9.2004, at 00:30, Dan Stromberg wrote:> However, when using dovecot with evo, if I sort of received by instead > of date, it takes forever. I assume this is because date is indexed, > and received by is not.Last I looked, Evolution fetched all except Received headers for all messages and sorted them locally. For Received-sorting it used IMAP's "internaldate" field, not the Received-header. I'm using Received-sorting with Evolution 1.4.6 and it isn't slow. I don't know if they've changed something in 2.0 though.> So the natural question becomes, is there a way of getting dovecot to > index received by?1.0-tests automatically cache whatever headers are specifically requested. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: PGP.sig Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 186 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: <http://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20041003/68d0ad36/attachment-0001.bin>