I had exactly this experience, and looked through the Eudora site. The
result of my research was basically that Eudora doesn't do SSL/TLS
properly.
In my case, I was using a self-signed certificate. The instructions for
how to make this work (pretend the IMAP server is a POP server? so that
you can see the failed SSL negotiation and add the certificate? is this
weird or am I?) were obscure, and didn't seem to work. I could never
make it work.
This was for a client for whom I was setting up a mail system; they
wanted to move away from Outlook onto something more secure, and opted
for the name recognition of Eudora. After fighting with it for a couple
of days, I tested with several alternate clients (thunderbird, mozilla,
pegasus, pocomail) and they all worked, so I recommended that the client
switch to something other than Eudora.
Or, in short, I think the problem is client lossage, not a server
problem.
Amy!
On Mon, 5 Jan 2004 16:08:52 -0500
Scott Klein <scott at thenation.com> wrote:
> I'm trying to get Dovecot (dovecot-0.99.10-6) to work with Eudora (6.0
> mac/win) and am having a real problem when I try to enable SSL, either
> TLS or alternate-port SSL.
>
> Although my other mail clients, mail.app, imp, etc. work just fine,
> either version of Eudora craps out when trying to connect via TLS or
> SSL-- on the mac I get the error
>
> Could not get mailbox list.
> 20
>
> [CLOSED] IMAP connection broken (command)
>
> On the PC I get something similar. Sometimes, on the mac, I don't get
> the [CLOSED] part I get
>
> Unable to get the required mailbox list from the server
>
> I've tried the "esoteric settings" trick (setting "user
plain text
> password" in the IMAP panel) but that doesn't work. Everything
works
> fine when I turn SSL off.
>
> I'm kind of at my wit's end. Has anybody experienced this? Have I
not
> read TFM? Hope y'all can help.
>
> Best,
> Scott Klein
>
--
Amelia A. Lewis amyzing {at} talsever.com
According to Business Week, in the 1990s the ratio between a chief
executive's salary and the takehome pay of the typical, feckless,
whining grunt on the shopfloor rose from 85:1 to 475:1. (In the UK,
which is seeing a vigorous popular backlash against "fat cat" pay
packets, the ratio is 24:1).
-- The Register