similar to: Problem with Eudora

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "Problem with Eudora"

2005 Feb 14
3
Help, problems with permissions
Hi I am replacing my current mail system, using Exim/Postgres/WU-IMAP to another host using Dovecot. Everything has gone well, until I have tried to access some test mails via POP. The error message I am getting is Feb 14 03:03:57 wpc1273 pop3(simonw at orion-w-t.co.uk): lstat (/home/dovecot/users/orion-w-t.co.uk/simonw/cur) failed: Permission denied Feb 14 03:03:57 wpc1273 pop3(simonw at
2003 Oct 05
2
Line length limitation in dovecot leads to out-of-control process?
Heylas! I've been copying mailboxes from one dovecot server (on an alpha running debian testing, 0.99.10-9) to another (on an i686 running debian unstable, 0.99.10-9). I encountered a weird problem, which I seem to have resolved by moving a message with a To: line from hell out of the mailbox. Both machines are running maildir. They're not exactly identical, but they're fairly
2003 Jan 17
1
Plain auth broken
On Fri, 2003-01-17 at 14:15, Timo Sirainen wrote: > On Thu, 2003-01-16 at 03:31, james broermann wrote: > > pine still doesn't want to work. It does detect that the server is using > > plain text passwords. I'll try the sniffer and see what turns up. > > Whops, you're right. I've tested pine only with digest-md5 > authentication before. Looks like my
2003 Dec 28
2
dovecot + ssl + outlook
i have installed dovecot on my debian server..... i have configured with imap + ssl all ok but i have one problem when I lunch for example outlook or outlook express appears this error Title of error page: Internet Secuiruty Warning The server you are connected to is using a security certificate that could not be verified The certificate's CN name does not match the passed value. Do
2004 Apr 23
2
problems with squirrelmail and TLS (debian unstable)
Heylas, So, okay, I've had this lovely IMAP server running, and adore the ease of configuration, among other things. Problem, though. I'm trying to set up SquirrelMail, so that some folks with accounts on my box can use it without having to set up a proper imap client (or can check mail when they're at a cafe, or like that). However, I *won't* turn off the
2002 Jan 28
3
eudora
Hi folks, I'm new to WINE and have actually read the docs, so go easy on me. My machine is setup to dual boot between Red Hat 7.2 and Windows2000. This is what I get when I try to run Eudora 5.1 from my Win2k partition. This is as far it'll go--no window ever displays. I get identical results with either WINE 20020122 or a CVS snapshot from yesterday evening. Let me know if
2007 Mar 06
2
New eudora problem - "mswmsg" not supported
I just upgraded from v0.9.9 to v0.9.32 (on Ubuntu 6.06) and Eudora Pro v4.2 stopped working. It no longer opens a mailbox when the icon is clicked. The log shows "fixme:rpc:alloc_serverprotoseq protseq "mswmsg" not supported" each time I click to open a mailbox. This was working on v0.9.9 so I am looking for ideas as to how to work around this problem. There is a bug
2004 Nov 15
2
eudora issue
There seems to be a protocol mismatch between eudora and dovecot when using pop. The login interchange with, for example, mozilla, is as follows: MO: [connects] DC: +OK dovecot ready. MO: CAPA DC: +OK DC: CAPA DC: TOP DC: USER DC: UIDL DC: RESP-CODES DC: STLS DC: SASL PLAIN DC: . MO: USER yyy DC: +OK MO: PASS xxxxxxxx DC: +OK Logged in. But with eudora, with apparently equivalent
2003 Jan 06
1
Eudora slow moving from samba 1.9.18p10 to latest
We are (only just) upgrading from Samba 1.9.18p10 to the latest 2.2.7a. We run Eudora 5.1 on our PC clients, which pick up their mail boxes from home directories on Solaris machines using samba shares. When we install the new Samba, all our Samba clients slow down incredibly. I suspect here is a change in the Samba config file requirements between the versions? Has anyone else already solved
2001 Oct 24
1
Ongoing Eudora problems and a thanks
First off, thanks to the Wine team-- the 10/4 build is the closest to working well with Eudora I have had since the one I currently run, which was 1/12/01. Second, thanks to Lawson Whitney for sending me the socket patch so I could get the 10/4 build on the net! Now, Eudora Light 3.0.5 is running much better under the 10/4 build. A few little things are still wrong. Running just "wine
2001 May 14
1
Wine & Eudora Pro
Has anyone been able to get Eudora Pro 5.x working with wine? I've got Red Hat 7.1, and I'm trying to get my Eudora Pro 5.0 running on my linux box, but so far, no luck. Thanks, David
2004 Dec 08
2
problems with eudora
Hi everyone, i just installed dovecot in Fedora Core release 1 (Yarrow). When accessing from a eudora 6.1 client, first it gave ssl authentication problems. I fixed disabling them in eudora, but now it authenticates ok and then it says that there is no inbox for that user. Any idea? Enrique Pedraza Valiente Formador en Lenguajes Avanzados y Nuevas Tecnolog?as cell: +34 678 51 75 19
2003 Mar 17
1
debian 0.99.8.1 packages available
I thought I'd mention it here because a lot of people have been waiting for me on this. My personal situation is getting saner now so I finally was able to package up 0.99.8.1. The package for sid was uploaded last night and should appear in the archive today. A backport for woody is available from http://www.braincells.com/open/ I have not included POP3, LDAP or SASL2 support for now as I
2005 Mar 11
3
Authentication error after authentication query (for Eudora 5.2 on Mac)
Greetings all, I'm a new user of Dovecot and want to say thanks for the great software. I am having a problem at the moment. I run a heterogeneous network with windows and Mac clients logging into a Fedora Linux 2 box running sendmail and previously UW-IMAP, but now Dovecot. I am using strictly pop3, plain authentication with mbox format. Every computer in the network is working fine with
1999 Sep 07
1
Eudora problems
Hi, I recently had problems setting up Eudora to store its data on a network share. The problem was that while it did work, it was incredibly slow, I would estimate about 10 times slower than it should be. I did some experimentation and found that it worked properly if the client was running Windows 98, but not if the client was running Windows 95. I could also get rid of the problem by turning
2005 Jan 27
1
Eudora not working?
Hi, I spent days trying to figure this out, and read over the instructions on the website over and over. I'm not super advanced with Linux, so I might need baby steps. I've tried running Eudora 5.1 (I think that's the version), and I keep on getting missing DLL warnings. I've put those DLLs in all the directories and made changes to the config file, but not use, I'm
2006 Jan 25
1
Problem with folders, dovecot-0.99.13-3.FC3 and Eudora 7.0.1
Greetings, the Eudora client is attempting to create a subfolder of an existing folder, using the "Make it a folder option" which creates a directory under /home/<user>/mail/<a few paths>. Eudora is seemingly stuck in attempting to create the directory, but there is nothing under /var/log which seems useful in diagnosing the problem. Thank you for your consideration,
2004 Sep 16
1
Mac Eudora and POP
I didn't get much joy in the list archives... Has anyone seen an instance of Mac users (OS9) using Eudora not being able to pop their mail? They can imap ok, just not pop (non-ssl btw). Nothing special in the logs... I'm not a Mac guy per se, maybe I'm missing something obvious? -- Chris Alexander UNIX Network Administrator, Information Networks and Systems Division
1997 Nov 05
1
Slow on SunOS 4.1.4 (Eudora mailer)
I have a problem with __extremely__ slow performance using the Eudora mailtool. Both the executables and the mailbox are on (different) Samba servers. I have played with all the combinations of placements for executables and mailbox, and what it amounts to is that the slowness happens with the mailbox on a SunOS 4.1.4 Samba server. It doesn't happen on a Solaris based Samba server. As an
2003 Jan 05
2
Some experiences
Heyas ... I'm trying to use dovecot to set up a 'closed server' (actually, mixed) sort of environment, for a box to be deployed co-located. I wanted to talk about some of that, and see if some of my experience qualifies as 'bug'. Note that I'm notoriously verbose, so if that bothers you, read no further .... Since it's a more-or-less closed server, I didn't want