search for: lossag

...flt64_info (struct file_handle * h, int size, int count); +static int read_long_var_names (struct file_handle * h, struct dictionary * + , unsigned long size, unsigned int count); static int read_documents (struct file_handle * h); /* Displays the message X with corrupt_msg, then jumps to the lossage @@ -418,11 +420,15 @@ break; case 7: /* Multiple-response sets (later versions of SPSS). */ - case 13: /* long variable names. PSPP now has code for these - that could be ported if someone is interested. */ skip = 1; break; + case 13: /* long variable names...

...te of this and tuck it > away for future implementation. No, LLVM has no need for random numbers. The methods in Interpreter/ExternalFunctions.cpp are just wrappers around system functions of the same name (to avoid having an FFI). In reality, these things can just be removed without too much lossage, but Brian would be the person to ok that. -Chris -- http://llvm.org/ http://nondot.org/sabre/

Hmm, I guess I need a sys::Math::getRandom() function that uses a "good" random number generator on the given platform. I'll make a note of this and tuck it away for future implementation. Reid. Chris Lattner wrote: > On Tue, 28 Sep 2004, Paolo Invernizzi wrote: > > >>The next major problem is that VC has only >> >>int rand(void) >>void srand(

I''m pleased to pass along news that the Mac OS X DTrace port has been updated in 10.5.3 to fix the issue that caused timer based probes not to fire in the presence of certain untraceable applications. http://blogs.sun.com/ahl/entry/apple_updates_dtrace A big thank you to the folks at Apple for addressing the problem. Adam -- Adam Leventhal, Fishworks

I'm trying to get Dovecot (dovecot-0.99.10-6) to work with Eudora (6.0 mac/win) and am having a real problem when I try to enable SSL, either TLS or alternate-port SSL. Although my other mail clients, mail.app, imp, etc. work just fine, either version of Eudora craps out when trying to connect via TLS or SSL -- on the mac I get the error Could not get mailbox list. 20 [CLOSED]

Hi All, I have been using samba 2.2.1a as the PDC, as a logon server for about 100 machines. Till now it has been fine, But for last 2 days all of sudden the trust relationship is lost from few random machines. Then we again have to reregister with SAMBA domain. When first time one m/c logins these are the logs. ############## [2002/10/24 09:58:55, 0]

Some of you may remember me as a NUT contributor years back - I did a significant amount of work on documentation, and later moved the repository from Subversion to GIT. I eventually drifted away from the project in large part because I found the lossage from lazy, least-cost-is-everything product designs too annoying to deal with. I recently had a bad experience with a UPS that brought all my frustrations back to the surface. I described it here, at "UPSes suck and need to be disrupted": http://esr.ibiblio.org/?p=7839 In 2018,...

...r6719 | xiphmont | 2004-05-18 16:04:53 +1000 (Tue, 18 May 2004) | 11 lines Updated doc to reflect current proposal... Not as much a proposal at this point actually; this is the way I'm now implementing it. Although we're still in the 'RFC'/'look for horrible lossage' stage, this is close to being set in stone unless we find something horribly wrong with it. Doc is still very light on detailed rationale and examples; I'd like to subcontract that part of the writing and get on with code. I'm a bit concerned about some of the multiplexing...

Hi Ted and all, I have a couple of questions near the end of this message, but first I have to describe my problem in some detail. The power failure on Thursday did something evil to my ext3 file system (box running RH9+patches, ext3, /dev/md0, raid5 driver, 400GB f/s using 3x200GB IDE drives and one hot-spare). The f/s got corrupt badly and the symptoms are very similar to what Eddy described

Features: * Management WEBrick - start, stop * Viewing log files * Abbrev from TextMate * Switching between View/Action http://www.emacswiki.org/cgi-bin/emacs/rails.el

On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 2:53 AM Peter Smith <peter.smith at linaro.org> wrote: > > On Mon, 24 Jun 2019 at 23:23, Siva Chandra via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > > Hello LLVM Developers, > > > > > > Within Google, we have a growing range of needs that existing libc implementations don't quite address. This is pushing us to

so, should this go into 3.5? Index: serverloop.c =================================================================== RCS file: /home/markus/cvs/ssh/serverloop.c,v retrieving revision 1.103 diff -u -r1.103 serverloop.c --- serverloop.c 24 Jun 2002 14:33:27 -0000 1.103 +++ serverloop.c 12 Jul 2002 16:34:20 -0000 @@ -388,6 +388,11 @@ buffer_append(&stderr_buffer, buf, len); } } + /*