Hi,
I have problems reading some mail with the latest version of dovecot.
I use maildir etc but it all worked before...
It seems like dovecot sends something that throws Evolution off the
track since the actual information is sent, but in a broken form it
seems.
I also get some odd chars (this is raw tcp packet decoding):
"??a-?
"??c-?* FLAGS (\Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen \Draft)
* OK [PERMANENTFLAGS (\Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen \Draft \*)]
Flags permitted.
* 609 EXISTS
* 0 RECENT
* OK [UIDVALIDITY 1049995962] UIDs valid
* OK [UIDNEXT 1044] Predicted next UID
A10891 OK [READ-WRITE] Select completed.
"??c-?
"??c-?* 609 FETCH (UID 1043)
A10892 OK Fetch completed.
"??g-?* 498 FETCH (UID 646 BODY[] {3434}
eturn-Path: <-----email------->
etc...
Any clues?
--
Ian Kumlien <pomac at vapor.com>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL:
<http://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20030502/ffffdeb5/attachment-0003.bin>
On Fri, 2003-05-02 at 01:25, Ian Kumlien wrote:> It seems like dovecot sends something that throws Evolution off the > track since the actual information is sent, but in a broken form it > seems.I'm using Evolution with two Dovecot 0.99.9 servers. Solaris+mbox and Linux+maildir. Don't see any problems.> I also get some odd chars (this is raw tcp packet decoding): > "??a-? > "??c-?Are these actually in the TCP stream or are these just TCP headers that you decoded as well? If they're in the stream, something's really wrong. What OS?> "??g-?* 498 FETCH (UID 646 BODY[] {3434} > eturn-Path: <-----email-------> > etc...It's missing 'R' there? With mbox it could be possible with broken indexes, but maildir?..
Possibly Parallel Threads
- [PATCH] Icecast2 - chroot, setuid/gid...
- [RFC] Move btrfsck in to the btrfs command
- [Bug 96802] New: Upgrading mesa from 11.0.6 -> 11.2.2 causes graphics deadlock
- [Bug 1145] New: nft 0.7: expression.c:966: range_expr_value_low: Assertion '0' failed.
- [Bug 1248] New: The rr-load-balance part doesn't actually work on 0.7