Hi, I have problems reading some mail with the latest version of dovecot. I use maildir etc but it all worked before... It seems like dovecot sends something that throws Evolution off the track since the actual information is sent, but in a broken form it seems. I also get some odd chars (this is raw tcp packet decoding): "??a-? "??c-?* FLAGS (\Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen \Draft) * OK [PERMANENTFLAGS (\Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen \Draft \*)] Flags permitted. * 609 EXISTS * 0 RECENT * OK [UIDVALIDITY 1049995962] UIDs valid * OK [UIDNEXT 1044] Predicted next UID A10891 OK [READ-WRITE] Select completed. "??c-? "??c-?* 609 FETCH (UID 1043) A10892 OK Fetch completed. "??g-?* 498 FETCH (UID 646 BODY[] {3434} eturn-Path: <-----email-------> etc... Any clues? -- Ian Kumlien <pomac at vapor.com> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: <http://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20030502/ffffdeb5/attachment-0003.bin>
On Fri, 2003-05-02 at 01:25, Ian Kumlien wrote:> It seems like dovecot sends something that throws Evolution off the > track since the actual information is sent, but in a broken form it > seems.I'm using Evolution with two Dovecot 0.99.9 servers. Solaris+mbox and Linux+maildir. Don't see any problems.> I also get some odd chars (this is raw tcp packet decoding): > "??a-? > "??c-?Are these actually in the TCP stream or are these just TCP headers that you decoded as well? If they're in the stream, something's really wrong. What OS?> "??g-?* 498 FETCH (UID 646 BODY[] {3434} > eturn-Path: <-----email-------> > etc...It's missing 'R' there? With mbox it could be possible with broken indexes, but maildir?..
Apparently Analagous Threads
- [PATCH] Icecast2 - chroot, setuid/gid...
- [RFC] Move btrfsck in to the btrfs command
- [Bug 96802] New: Upgrading mesa from 11.0.6 -> 11.2.2 causes graphics deadlock
- [Bug 1145] New: nft 0.7: expression.c:966: range_expr_value_low: Assertion '0' failed.
- [Bug 1248] New: The rr-load-balance part doesn't actually work on 0.7