On 09/02/16 12:08 AM, g wrote:> > > On 02/08/16 15:34, Wes James wrote: >> Is there a utility to zero unused blocks on a disk? >> >> CentOS 6.7/Ext4 >> >> I saw zerofree, but I?m not sure it would work on Ext4 or even work on >> this version of CentOS. >> >> thanks, >> > . > a comment on replies to your post. > > i find it interesting that "Subject:" is and you ask for info to > > *zero unused blocks on disk* > > and all the replies for wiping the _entire_ disk. > > why is so hard to understand that _blocks_ does not mean _disk_. ((GBWG))Not all of them. -- Digimer Papers and Projects: https://alteeve.ca/w/ What if the cure for cancer is trapped in the mind of a person without access to education?
On 02/08/16 23:10, Digimer wrote:> On 09/02/16 12:08 AM, g wrote: >> >> >> On 02/08/16 15:34, Wes James wrote: >>> Is there a utility to zero unused blocks on a disk? >>> >>> CentOS 6.7/Ext4 >>> >>> I saw zerofree, but I?m not sure it would work on Ext4 or even work on >>> this version of CentOS. >>> >>> thanks, >>> >> . >> a comment on replies to your post. >> >> i find it interesting that "Subject:" is and you ask for info to >> >> *zero unused blocks on disk* >> >> and all the replies for wiping the _entire_ disk. >> >> why is so hard to understand that _blocks_ does not mean _disk_. ((GBWG)) > > Not all of them. >. this is true. also true is that i phrased with; and all the replies for not, with all replies for because, yes, i did read you reply with all the rest. ;-) fell better? :-P -- peace out. If Bill Gates got a dime for every time Windows crashes... ...oh, wait. He does. THAT explains it! -+- in a world with out fences, who needs gates. CentOS GNU/Linux 6.7 tc,hago. g .
On 09/02/16 12:24 AM, g wrote:> > > On 02/08/16 23:10, Digimer wrote: >> On 09/02/16 12:08 AM, g wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 02/08/16 15:34, Wes James wrote: >>>> Is there a utility to zero unused blocks on a disk? >>>> >>>> CentOS 6.7/Ext4 >>>> >>>> I saw zerofree, but I?m not sure it would work on Ext4 or even work on >>>> this version of CentOS. >>>> >>>> thanks, >>>> >>> . >>> a comment on replies to your post. >>> >>> i find it interesting that "Subject:" is and you ask for info to >>> >>> *zero unused blocks on disk* >>> >>> and all the replies for wiping the _entire_ disk. >>> >>> why is so hard to understand that _blocks_ does not mean _disk_. ((GBWG)) >> >> Not all of them. >> > . > this is true. > > also true is that i phrased with; > > and all the replies for > > not, > > with all replies for > > because, yes, i did read you reply with all the rest. ;-) > > fell better? :-PI need ice cream to feel better. ;) -- Digimer Papers and Projects: https://alteeve.ca/w/ What if the cure for cancer is trapped in the mind of a person without access to education?