search for: _blocks_

...; thanks, >> > . > a comment on replies to your post. > > i find it interesting that "Subject:" is and you ask for info to > > *zero unused blocks on disk* > > and all the replies for wiping the _entire_ disk. > > why is so hard to understand that _blocks_ does not mean _disk_. ((GBWG)) Not all of them. -- Digimer Papers and Projects: https://alteeve.ca/w/ What if the cure for cancer is trapped in the mind of a person without access to education?

Is there a utility to zero unused blocks on a disk? CentOS 6.7/Ext4 I saw zerofree, but I?m not sure it would work on Ext4 or even work on this version of CentOS. thanks, -wes

...or even work on > this version of CentOS. > > thanks, > . a comment on replies to your post. i find it interesting that "Subject:" is and you ask for info to *zero unused blocks on disk* and all the replies for wiping the _entire_ disk. why is so hard to understand that _blocks_ does not mean _disk_. ((GBWG)) -- peace out. If Bill Gates got a dime for every time Windows crashes... ...oh, wait. He does. THAT explains it! -+- in a world with out fences, who needs gates. CentOS GNU/Linux 6.7 tc,hago. g .

...t; a comment on replies to your post. >> >> i find it interesting that "Subject:" is and you ask for info to >> >> *zero unused blocks on disk* >> >> and all the replies for wiping the _entire_ disk. >> >> why is so hard to understand that _blocks_ does not mean _disk_. ((GBWG)) > > Not all of them. > . this is true. also true is that i phrased with; and all the replies for not, with all replies for because, yes, i did read you reply with all the rest. ;-) fell better? :-P -- peace out. If Bill Gates got a dime for ever...

...post. >>> >>> i find it interesting that "Subject:" is and you ask for info to >>> >>> *zero unused blocks on disk* >>> >>> and all the replies for wiping the _entire_ disk. >>> >>> why is so hard to understand that _blocks_ does not mean _disk_. ((GBWG)) >> >> Not all of them. >> > . > this is true. > > also true is that i phrased with; > > and all the replies for > > not, > > with all replies for > > because, yes, i did read you reply with all the rest. ;...