Displaying 12 results from an estimated 12 matches for "_disk_".
Did you mean:
disk_
2016 Feb 09
2
Utility to zero unused blocks on disk
....
> a comment on replies to your post.
>
> i find it interesting that "Subject:" is and you ask for info to
>
> *zero unused blocks on disk*
>
> and all the replies for wiping the _entire_ disk.
>
> why is so hard to understand that _blocks_ does not mean _disk_. ((GBWG))
Not all of them.
--
Digimer
Papers and Projects: https://alteeve.ca/w/
What if the cure for cancer is trapped in the mind of a person without
access to education?
2016 Jun 30
0
[PATCH] : Adding dlabel option to chain.c32
...and jump to it.
> This new option offer to boot the disk that have a partition which
> have a given label.
> The label is so just a way to detect a disk to boot.
>
The "dlabel" option searches in disks for a partition with the
specified label, and jumps to the first _disk_ that matches the search.
The specified partition might not be related to the boot process; its
label is just used for the detection / selection of the disk.
> A typical use is for making an intelligent localboot like :
>
A possible use case is for making a localboot like:
>...
2016 Jul 14
3
[PATCH] : Adding dlabel option to chain.c32
On 07/14/16 05:56, Ady Ady via Syslinux wrote:
>
> @Peter, Erwan, Gene, Michal, (and anyone else interested)...
>
> Although I haven't actually tested Erwan's patch, would it be
> acceptable by you (all) if I were to send a patch to this Syslinux
> Mailing List with the same code while changing the wording as I
> previously suggested in a prior email? Would it be
2016 Feb 08
10
Utility to zero unused blocks on disk
Is there a utility to zero unused blocks on a disk?
CentOS 6.7/Ext4
I saw zerofree, but I?m not sure it would work on Ext4 or even work on this version of CentOS.
thanks,
-wes
2016 Jul 14
0
[PATCH] : Adding dlabel option to chain.c32
...s suggested new option, the 'label' belongs to a partition (not a
disk), and the partition _might_ be involved in the booting process, or
it might optionally not. The media to be chained to is _selected_ by
the label of a partition, and then the chainloading is performed to the
relevant _disk_ (not the partition).
In other words, the process is two-fold; first the selection, by a
certain parameter, and then the actual chainloading, to a media that is
related to the first selection step but only indirectly. The relevance
of _two_ (somewhat "separated") devices should better...
2016 Feb 09
0
Utility to zero unused blocks on disk
...his version of CentOS.
>
> thanks,
>
.
a comment on replies to your post.
i find it interesting that "Subject:" is and you ask for info to
*zero unused blocks on disk*
and all the replies for wiping the _entire_ disk.
why is so hard to understand that _blocks_ does not mean _disk_. ((GBWG))
--
peace out.
If Bill Gates got a dime for every time Windows crashes...
...oh, wait. He does. THAT explains it!
-+-
in a world with out fences, who needs gates.
CentOS GNU/Linux 6.7
tc,hago.
g
.
2016 Feb 09
0
Utility to zero unused blocks on disk
...to your post.
>>
>> i find it interesting that "Subject:" is and you ask for info to
>>
>> *zero unused blocks on disk*
>>
>> and all the replies for wiping the _entire_ disk.
>>
>> why is so hard to understand that _blocks_ does not mean _disk_. ((GBWG))
>
> Not all of them.
>
.
this is true.
also true is that i phrased with;
and all the replies for
not,
with all replies for
because, yes, i did read you reply with all the rest. ;-)
fell better? :-P
--
peace out.
If Bill Gates got a dime for every time Windows crashe...
2016 Feb 09
2
Utility to zero unused blocks on disk
...>> i find it interesting that "Subject:" is and you ask for info to
>>>
>>> *zero unused blocks on disk*
>>>
>>> and all the replies for wiping the _entire_ disk.
>>>
>>> why is so hard to understand that _blocks_ does not mean _disk_. ((GBWG))
>>
>> Not all of them.
>>
> .
> this is true.
>
> also true is that i phrased with;
>
> and all the replies for
>
> not,
>
> with all replies for
>
> because, yes, i did read you reply with all the rest. ;-)
>
> fell be...
2016 Jul 13
2
[PATCH] : Adding dlabel option to chain.c32
On 06/30/16 14:19, Ady Ady via Syslinux wrote:
>
> BTW, any suggestions for an alternative name for this option, instead
> of "dlabel"?
>
"disklabel"
-hpa
2016 Jun 30
8
[PATCH] : Adding dlabel option to chain.c32
The exisiting label= option offer to boot on a gpt partition that have
a particular label.
The existing guuid= option offer to boot on a disk or partition with a
particular label.
This new option offer to boot the disk that have a partition which
have a given label.
The label is so just a way to detect a disk to boot.
A typical use is for making an intelligent localboot like :
label
2016 Jul 15
0
[PATCH] : Add diskbypartname option to chain.c32
...hain.c' and for 'com32/chain/options.c.
The existing "label:" and "guid:" options select a specified partition
and jump to it.
The new "diskbypartname" option searches in disks for a GPT partition
with the specified Partition Name, and jumps to the first _disk_ that
matches the search.
The specified partition might not be related to the boot process; its
Name is just used for the detection / selection of the disk.
A possible use case is for making a localboot like:
label localboot
com32 chain.c32
append diskbypartname=datapartitio...
2010 Mar 10
39
SSD Optimizations
I''m looking to try BTRFS on a SSD, and I would like to know what SSD
optimizations it applies. Is there a comprehensive list of what ssd
mount option does? How are the blocks and metadata arranged? Are there
options available comparable to ext2/ext3 to help reduce wear and
improve performance?
Specifically, on ext2 (journal means more writes, so I don''t use ext3 on
SSDs,