search for: _entire_

All, I have an error message that I would like to be more readable, since my column name doesn''t look good. I want to change the output of validates_presence_of :eSubject from Esubject can''t be blank to Subject can''t be blank Do I have to go through aliasing the whole eSubject column in the AR class or is there an easier way to just modify the "field

...le inheritance" button only exists on Win8 and later. > Just checked with 'Computer Management' on Win7 and you could be right, > in fact, the entire page seems wrong, I wonder what version of Windows > Marc used ? I really don't understand why you are saying that the _entire_ page is wrong? Regards, Marc

...en work on >> this version of CentOS. >> >> thanks, >> > . > a comment on replies to your post. > > i find it interesting that "Subject:" is and you ask for info to > > *zero unused blocks on disk* > > and all the replies for wiping the _entire_ disk. > > why is so hard to understand that _blocks_ does not mean _disk_. ((GBWG)) Not all of them. -- Digimer Papers and Projects: https://alteeve.ca/w/ What if the cure for cancer is trapped in the mind of a person without access to education?

...rsync invocation that synced nothing at all. (I wanted to avoid a sync by fiddling a config file in some automation rather than changing to auomation to have a skip-the-rsync mode.) Anyway, it seems to me with rsync-3.0.5 that one of: --exclude=/ --exclude=/* --exclude=*/ ought to omit the _entire_ directory tree. In fact, the first seems to do nothing (the whole tree gets synced) and the latter two omit everything except the top directory itself. I had hoped to omit everything including the top directory, thus making no changes of any kind to the target (yes, I know -n will do that too:-)...

Is there a utility to zero unused blocks on a disk? CentOS 6.7/Ext4 I saw zerofree, but I?m not sure it would work on Ext4 or even work on this version of CentOS. thanks, -wes

...w zerofree, but I?m not sure it would work on Ext4 or even work on > this version of CentOS. > > thanks, > . a comment on replies to your post. i find it interesting that "Subject:" is and you ask for info to *zero unused blocks on disk* and all the replies for wiping the _entire_ disk. why is so hard to understand that _blocks_ does not mean _disk_. ((GBWG)) -- peace out. If Bill Gates got a dime for every time Windows crashes... ...oh, wait. He does. THAT explains it! -+- in a world with out fences, who needs gates. CentOS GNU/Linux 6.7 tc,hago. g .

...S. >>> >>> thanks, >>> >> . >> a comment on replies to your post. >> >> i find it interesting that "Subject:" is and you ask for info to >> >> *zero unused blocks on disk* >> >> and all the replies for wiping the _entire_ disk. >> >> why is so hard to understand that _blocks_ does not mean _disk_. ((GBWG)) > > Not all of them. > . this is true. also true is that i phrased with; and all the replies for not, with all replies for because, yes, i did read you reply with all the rest. ;-) f...

...>>>> >>> . >>> a comment on replies to your post. >>> >>> i find it interesting that "Subject:" is and you ask for info to >>> >>> *zero unused blocks on disk* >>> >>> and all the replies for wiping the _entire_ disk. >>> >>> why is so hard to understand that _blocks_ does not mean _disk_. ((GBWG)) >> >> Not all of them. >> > . > this is true. > > also true is that i phrased with; > > and all the replies for > > not, > > with all rep...

...; I'll agree that they are good and on the average do a good job, but > that stops far short of saying that they know better than the > perl (etc.) teams what version you should be running. And _where_ did I say that? All I said was that _backporting_ is done to _minimize_ impact to the _entire_ set of _all_ packages that have been "regression tested" into a released, SLA guaranteed distro. That's what RHEL/SLES are about. At what point are you going to stop seeing what I saw as a black/white thing and realize that RHEL/SLES have _different_ foci than what you may want, and...

...; Hi, >> >> > Just checked with 'Computer Management' on Win7 and you could be >> > right, in fact, the entire page seems wrong, I wonder what version >> > of Windows Marc used ? >> >> I really don't understand why you are saying that the _entire_ page >> is wrong? >> >Perhaps 'wrong' is the wrong word ;-) >What I meant was, If I run Computer Management on Win7 , I do not get >the same options shown in the screenshots on that wikipage, so I cannot >set things as shown. >Rowland   To me they seem screens...

...Cobalt and Sun -- is that people assumed they were distributing Red Hat's product, unmodified. They were not and actually distributing a radically different version that was heavily modified. I even had this discussion with a guy who hates RPM and Red Hat, and once he finally realized that his _entire_ viewpoint was based on Cobalts, he _finally_ saw the whole reason for the trademark issues Red Hat now has. It was quite an epiphany. ;-> -- Bryan J. Smith mailto:b.j.smith at ieee.org

...050 combo), then I'm going to be able to handle _concurrent_ I/O for independent (and sometimes even inter-dependent) processors. You think of "raw throughput" like 8.4GBps FSB can easily handle a 0.5GBps transfer, but what you don't realize that the 0.5GBps transfer holds up the _entire_ 8.4GBps bus for _just_ 0.5GBps. I.e., it takes 1 second for a 0.5GBps burst from the I/O, which means you do _not_ "get the other 7.9GBps" while it's tied up. Now on workstations, not too much of an issue (except for when you need all: video, NIC, storage). And maybe not a web serv...

Hi all,   can I freely create an account for the Wiki and do changes? Or should I notify someone (Rowland)? I found a small error in https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/User_Home_Folders . The wiki mentions as rights on the share Read and Execute for Authenticated Users, but on that level I see only Full Control, Change and Read. My assumption is that it should be Change and Read for Authenticated

...land Penny via samba: >>> Just checked with 'Computer Management' on Win7 and you could be >>> right, in fact, the entire page seems wrong, I wonder what version >>> of Windows Marc used ? >> >> I really don't understand why you are saying that the _entire_ page >> is wrong? >> > > Perhaps 'wrong' is the wrong word ;-) > > What I meant was, If I run Computer Management on Win7 , I do not get > the same options shown in the screenshots on that wikipage, so I cannot > set things as shown. The next time, please say...

> How's forever work for you? ;-> Absolutely FINE thank you! When your WizWonder package is housebroken, let me try it if I'm interested. Until then, a (stubbornly) broken distro will persuade me to try something else. That's why I left Windows, I guess, if you prognosticate correctly, it will be why I leave RedHat/CentOS. btw this has nothing to do with Firewalls at

We have a service that clients use to upload files. We have a couple of clients that are on slow links and so their upload times out. We get errors in the logs that I''d like to get rid of. I was hoping that the recent commit 24b9f66dcdda44378b4053645333ce9ce336b413 would help us, but it does not. After digging in a bit, I have some ideas about why and a patch I''d like comments

Hey, The company I work for is in the market for a new firewall. Right now we're hosting all of our own stuff (on CentOS servers) behind an old checkpoint firewall. I think Checkpoint is overkill for our needs and very expensive, plus I don't like the "per-user" charges of some commercial solutions. What do you guys suggest that we upgrade to? Here are some of the

Hi all, Recently there''s been discussion [1] in the Linux community about how filesystems should deal with rename(2), particularly in the case of a crash. ext4 was found to truncate files after a crash, that had been written with open("foo.tmp"), write(), close() and then rename("foo.tmp", "foo"). This is because ext4 uses delayed allocation and may not

...# use 'segments' to color each path > segments(head(rw[, 1], -1), head(rw[, 2], -1), tail(rw[, 1], -1), > tail(rw[, > 2], -1), col ="blue") > > > This code is giving me error in the return()... what to write in > return()??? You are requested to post the _entire_ error message. It seems rather informative. You are giving two arguments to return() and it only accepts one. Probably better success with return(rw). -- David Winsemius, MD West Hartford, CT ------------------------------ Message: 34 Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 14:10:59 -0400 From: David Wins...