----- Original Message -----> From:Kai Schaetzl <maillists at conactive.com> > To:centos at centos.org > Cc: > Sent:Tuesday, 5 April 2011, 13:21 > Subject:Re: [CentOS] KILL THIS THREAD ( Centos 6 Update?) > > +100 !!!! > > KaiAnybody that thinks this thread can be "killed" is so badly mis-understanding the situation. This thread or others like it will continue to pop-up in the short term until all releases are in-line with RH and then they will continually re-appear with subsequent releases. So 'killing' the thread is akin to burying ones head in the sand. I question whether a rebuild project is a sensible way forward for anything but hobbyist use. That isn't a criticism of the dev team (before anyone tries to twist it as such) but more a question about the viability of the model.?
Ian Murray wrote on Tue, 5 Apr 2011 22:49:54 +0100 (BST):> This thread or others like it will continuewrong. It will continue as long people bite. Stop biting the bait! Kai
----- Original Message -----> From:Kai Schaetzl <maillists at conactive.com>> > > This thread or others like it will continue > > wrong. It will continue as long people bite. Stop biting the bait! > > KaiOh, the irony.... Likewise. Somebody will still keep coming onto ask the questions, esp. non-regular list users.... hell, people do it now and the subject has been done to death over the last few months. I personally see little point in the threads either. As far as I can tell, you have to accept the situation as-is or switch distro. Dev model isn't going to change and previously said, anyway... maybe the rebuild model for non-hobbyist use has run its course.
Maybe Matching Threads
- Will Rogers: Kai Schaetzl may be ignorant about kill files (was: how will CentOS handle the perftools 1.7 vs. 1.6 issue?)
- PHP version not enough for developers
- Subject: "yum update" did not update kernel on one box
- [Fwd: Re: fail2ban needs shorewall?]
- Threading and CentOS mailing list digest