Drew Weaver
2011-Jan-18 14:22 UTC
[CentOS] Intel DH67BL + CentOS 5.5 IRQ #177 nobody cared
Hello, We have built a couple of CentOS 5.5 systems on the Intel DH67BL (Sandy Bridge) motherboard and overall they work pretty well. I'm having one problem which keeps cropping up and that is an error message that says: IRQ 177 nobody cared (try booting with the irqpoll option) report bad irq, references CPU idle then it references usb_hcd_irq and e1000_intr then it disables the add-on PCI E1000 card and disconnects itself from the network. I'm assuming what is happening here is the USB controller and the add-on E1000 controller we put in are having an old school IRQ conflict, the question is why and how can I avoid it? I have tried disabling all of the extra stuff in the BIOS that I could, and this still happens fairly frequently. Any advice would be great. thanks, -Drew -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20110118/34d685ae/attachment-0002.html>
Giles Coochey
2011-Jan-18 14:23 UTC
[CentOS] Intel DH67BL + CentOS 5.5 IRQ #177 nobody cared
On 18/01/2011 15:22, Drew Weaver wrote:> > Hello, > > We have built a couple of CentOS 5.5 systems on the Intel DH67BL > (Sandy Bridge) motherboard and overall they work pretty well. > > I'm having one problem which keeps cropping up and that is an error > message that says: > > IRQ 177 nobody cared (try booting with the irqpoll option) > > report bad irq, references CPU idle > > then it references usb_hcd_irq and e1000_intr > > then it disables the add-on PCI E1000 card and disconnects itself from > the network. > > I'm assuming what is happening here is the USB controller and the > add-on E1000 controller we put in are having an old school IRQ > conflict, the question is why and how can I avoid it? > > I have tried disabling all of the extra stuff in the BIOS that I > could, and this still happens fairly frequently. > > Any advice would be great. > >Have you tried putting one of the cards in a different slot? -- Best Regards, Giles Coochey NetSecSpec Ltd NL T-Systems Mobile: +31 681 265 086 NL Mobile: +31 626 508 131 Email/MSN/Live Messenger: giles at coochey.net Skype: gilescoochey -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 5137 bytes Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20110118/6cc923ff/attachment-0002.p7s>
Drew Weaver
2011-Jan-18 14:34 UTC
[CentOS] Intel DH67BL + CentOS 5.5 IRQ #177 nobody cared
Ah, it is a PCI card and there is only one PCI slot.. -Drew -----Original Message----- From: centos-bounces at centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On Behalf Of Giles Coochey Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2011 9:24 AM To: centos at centos.org Subject: Re: [CentOS] Intel DH67BL + CentOS 5.5 IRQ #177 nobody cared On 18/01/2011 15:22, Drew Weaver wrote:> > Hello, > > We have built a couple of CentOS 5.5 systems on the Intel DH67BL > (Sandy Bridge) motherboard and overall they work pretty well. > > I'm having one problem which keeps cropping up and that is an error > message that says: > > IRQ 177 nobody cared (try booting with the irqpoll option) > > report bad irq, references CPU idle > > then it references usb_hcd_irq and e1000_intr > > then it disables the add-on PCI E1000 card and disconnects itself from > the network. > > I'm assuming what is happening here is the USB controller and the > add-on E1000 controller we put in are having an old school IRQ > conflict, the question is why and how can I avoid it? > > I have tried disabling all of the extra stuff in the BIOS that I > could, and this still happens fairly frequently. > > Any advice would be great. > >Have you tried putting one of the cards in a different slot? -- Best Regards, Giles Coochey NetSecSpec Ltd NL T-Systems Mobile: +31 681 265 086 NL Mobile: +31 626 508 131 Email/MSN/Live Messenger: giles at coochey.net Skype: gilescoochey
Luis Trindade
2011-Jan-18 14:54 UTC
[CentOS] Intel DH67BL + CentOS 5.5 IRQ #177 nobody cared
Hi Drew, Why don't you use the mother board incorporated NIC? it does have one right? Best Regards, and sorry for my english... :) -- Lu?s Trindade nfsi telecom, lda. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Drew Weaver" <drew.weaver at thenap.com> To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos at centos.org> Sent: Tuesday, 18 January, 2011 2:22:04 PM Subject: [CentOS] Intel DH67BL + CentOS 5.5 IRQ #177 nobody cared Hello, We have built a couple of CentOS 5.5 systems on the Intel DH67BL (Sandy Bridge) motherboard and overall they work pretty well. I'm having one problem which keeps cropping up and that is an error message that says: IRQ 177 nobody cared (try booting with the irqpoll option) report bad irq, references CPU idle then it references usb_hcd_irq and e1000_intr then it disables the add-on PCI E1000 card and disconnects itself from the network. I'm assuming what is happening here is the USB controller and the add-on E1000 controller we put in are having an old school IRQ conflict, the question is why and how can I avoid it? I have tried disabling all of the extra stuff in the BIOS that I could, and this still happens fairly frequently. Any advice would be great. thanks, -Drew _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS at centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20110118/71e6a00c/attachment-0002.html>
Radu Radutiu
2011-Jan-18 15:43 UTC
[CentOS] Intel DH67BL + CentOS 5.5 IRQ #177 nobody cared
> > IRQ 177 nobody cared (try booting with the irqpoll option) >Have you tried what the error message suggests (add irqpool to the kernel line in grub.conf) ? Regards, Radu
>IRQ 177 nobody cared (try booting with the irqpoll option)>report bad irq, references CPU idle>I'm assuming what is happening here is the USB controller and the add-onE1000 controller we put in are having an old school IRQ conflict, the question is why and how can I avoid it? IRQ177 means you are using APIC, which gives you over 250 interrupts - far more than there were in the olden days. There should be enough that nothing has to share IRQs. But even before APIC came along, devices had gotten pretty good at sharing IRQs. As someone suggested, disable the Plug and Play option in the bios. Try a different brand of Ethernet card? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20110118/4825bcb3/attachment-0002.html>
On Wednesday, January 19, 2011 12:35:18 pm Drew Weaver wrote:> The kernel boots fine, and everything works ok until you unplug the monitor from the DVI port on the motherboard. > > When you unplug the monitor, that IRQ/ACPI message is displayed, and it screws up the USB and the e1000 card in the system. > > These machines aren't always headless, sometimes we need to plug monitors into them.Can you disable the video card's use of an IRQ? I've seen that before, where the video card had an IRQ whether the driver needed it or not. If you use a DVI to VGA/analog adapter and unplug an analog monitor, does it still happen?