Pasi Kärkkäinen
2017-Sep-20 08:10 UTC
[CentOS-virt] Status of reverted Linux patch "tty: Fix ldisc crash on reopened tty", Linux 4.9 kernel frequent crashes
On Tue, Sep 05, 2017 at 10:49:13AM -0700, Nathan March wrote:> > > I have no issues rolling this patch in , while we wait on upstream, if > > > it makes our tree more stable. > > > > > > > I think we should do that.. What do others think? > > > > I've had the patch deployed to a group of 32 hosts (with hundreds of vms) > for about 10 days now and no sign of any issues. > > So I support it =) >Thanks Nathan. Johnny: Can you please add the patch to next Linux 4.9 kernel build? Thanks, -- Pasi> Cheers, > Nathan
Johnny Hughes
2017-Sep-20 09:49 UTC
[CentOS-virt] Status of reverted Linux patch "tty: Fix ldisc crash on reopened tty", Linux 4.9 kernel frequent crashes
On 09/20/2017 03:10 AM, Pasi K?rkk?inen wrote:> On Tue, Sep 05, 2017 at 10:49:13AM -0700, Nathan March wrote: >>>> I have no issues rolling this patch in , while we wait on upstream, if >>>> it makes our tree more stable. >>>> >>> >>> I think we should do that.. What do others think? >>> >> >> I've had the patch deployed to a group of 32 hosts (with hundreds of vms) >> for about 10 days now and no sign of any issues. >> >> So I support it =) >> > > Thanks Nathan. > > Johnny: Can you please add the patch to next Linux 4.9 kernel build? > > > Thanks, > > -- Pasi > >> Cheers, >> Nathan > >It has already been built into the latest test kernel .. 4.9.48-29.el7 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-virt/attachments/20170920/cb21656f/attachment-0002.sig>
Pasi Kärkkäinen
2017-Sep-20 12:47 UTC
[CentOS-virt] Status of reverted Linux patch "tty: Fix ldisc crash on reopened tty", Linux 4.9 kernel frequent crashes
On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 04:49:10AM -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:> On 09/20/2017 03:10 AM, Pasi K?rkk?inen wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 05, 2017 at 10:49:13AM -0700, Nathan March wrote: > >>>> I have no issues rolling this patch in , while we wait on upstream, if > >>>> it makes our tree more stable. > >>>> > >>> > >>> I think we should do that.. What do others think? > >>> > >> > >> I've had the patch deployed to a group of 32 hosts (with hundreds of vms) > >> for about 10 days now and no sign of any issues. > >> > >> So I support it =) > >> > > > > Thanks Nathan. > > > > Johnny: Can you please add the patch to next Linux 4.9 kernel build? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > -- Pasi > > > >> Cheers, > >> Nathan > > > > > > It has already been built into the latest test kernel .. 4.9.48-29.el7 >Oh, I missed that. Thanks a lot! -- Pasi
Apparently Analagous Threads
- Status of reverted Linux patch "tty: Fix ldisc crash on reopened tty", Linux 4.9 kernel frequent crashes
- Status of reverted Linux patch "tty: Fix ldisc crash on reopened tty", Linux 4.9 kernel frequent crashes
- Status of reverted Linux patch "tty: Fix ldisc crash on reopened tty", Linux 4.9 kernel frequent crashes
- Status of reverted Linux patch "tty: Fix ldisc crash on reopened tty", Linux 4.9 kernel frequent crashes
- Status of reverted Linux patch "tty: Fix ldisc crash on reopened tty", Linux 4.9 kernel frequent crashes