search for: 13am

Does upstream dom0 support superpage? best regards yang

...erer 35334 4.9 1.7 11740 8828 ?? R 2:56AM 36:23.59 > [python] > wanderer 35336 4.9 1.7 11740 8828 ?? R 2:56AM 36:21.37 > [python] > wanderer 35340 4.9 1.7 11740 8828 ?? R 2:56AM 36:22.03 > [python] > wanderer 10005 0.0 0.2 1792 1004 ?? Is 2:13AM 0:00.01 > /bin/sh -c cd /home/wanderer/pkg/build/llvm/night && ./testr > wanderer 10006 0.0 0.2 1800 1040 ?? I 2:13AM 0:00.01 > /bin/sh - ./testrun > wanderer 10011 0.0 0.4 3020 2332 ?? I 2:13AM 0:00.06 [perl] > wanderer 35234 0.0 0.2 1796 1032...

...R 2:56AM 36:18.76 [python] wanderer 35334 4.9 1.7 11740 8828 ?? R 2:56AM 36:23.59 [python] wanderer 35336 4.9 1.7 11740 8828 ?? R 2:56AM 36:21.37 [python] wanderer 35340 4.9 1.7 11740 8828 ?? R 2:56AM 36:22.03 [python] wanderer 10005 0.0 0.2 1792 1004 ?? Is 2:13AM 0:00.01 /bin/sh -c cd /home/wanderer/pkg/build/llvm/night && ./testr wanderer 10006 0.0 0.2 1800 1040 ?? I 2:13AM 0:00.01 /bin/sh - ./testrun wanderer 10011 0.0 0.4 3020 2332 ?? I 2:13AM 0:00.06 [perl] wanderer 35234 0.0 0.2 1796 1032 ?? I 2:55AM 0:00.00...

>> > I assume you're talking about the FreeBSD run. I'm not sure what is >> > going >> > on >> >> No. You can see problem with Feature tests at >> http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/testresults/X86/ also (see Feature Test Results >> section ) > > I'm not sure that I follow. The qmtest stuff isn't working on Zion > because (I

...0 1228 ?? I 5:54AM 0:00.14 imap [simon 24.43.241.184] simon 9066 0.0 0.1 1040 1244 ?? I 6:01AM 0:28.46 imap [simon 24.43.241.184] simon 15098 0.0 0.1 908 1120 ?? I 6:01AM 0:00.12 imap [simon 24.43.241.184] simon 15905 0.0 0.1 992 1232 ?? I 6:13AM 0:39.33 imap [simon 24.43.241.184] simon 26291 0.0 0.1 848 1264 ?? I 6:13AM 0:00.10 imap [simon 24.43.241.184] simon 20385 0.0 0.1 1004 1216 ?? I 6:14AM 0:00.23 imap [simon 24.43.241.184] simon 21078 0.0 0.1 876 1224 ?? I 6:15AM 0:39.01 imap [sim...

...40 8828 ?? R 2:56AM 36:23.59 >> [python] >> wanderer 35336 4.9 1.7 11740 8828 ?? R 2:56AM 36:21.37 >> [python] >> wanderer 35340 4.9 1.7 11740 8828 ?? R 2:56AM 36:22.03 >> [python] >> wanderer 10005 0.0 0.2 1792 1004 ?? Is 2:13AM 0:00.01 >> /bin/sh -c cd /home/wanderer/pkg/build/llvm/night && ./testr >> wanderer 10006 0.0 0.2 1800 1040 ?? I 2:13AM 0:00.01 >> /bin/sh - ./testrun >> wanderer 10011 0.0 0.4 3020 2332 ?? I 2:13AM 0:00.06 [perl] >> wanderer 35234...

...M 36:23.59 >>> [python] >>> wanderer 35336 4.9 1.7 11740 8828 ?? R 2:56AM 36:21.37 >>> [python] >>> wanderer 35340 4.9 1.7 11740 8828 ?? R 2:56AM 36:22.03 >>> [python] >>> wanderer 10005 0.0 0.2 1792 1004 ?? Is 2:13AM 0:00.01 >>> /bin/sh -c cd /home/wanderer/pkg/build/llvm/night && ./testr >>> wanderer 10006 0.0 0.2 1800 1040 ?? I 2:13AM 0:00.01 >>> /bin/sh - ./testrun >>> wanderer 10011 0.0 0.4 3020 2332 ?? I 2:13AM 0:00.06 [perl] >>&...

On Tue, Sep 05, 2017 at 10:49:13AM -0700, Nathan March wrote: > > > I have no issues rolling this patch in , while we wait on upstream, if > > > it makes our tree more stable. > > > > > > > I think we should do that.. What do others think? > > > > I've had the patch deployed...

Hi, I updated the random I/O documentation patch: https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/89022/ I would to get your comments on this before we complete the implementation. Thanks, Nir

On 2019/8/2 ??10:27, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Fri, Aug 02, 2019 at 09:46:13AM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: >> On Fri, Aug 02, 2019 at 05:40:07PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: >>>> This must be a proper barrier, like a spinlock, mutex, or >>>> synchronize_rcu. >>> >>> I start with synchronize_rcu() but both you and Michael raise som...

On 2019/8/2 ??10:27, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Fri, Aug 02, 2019 at 09:46:13AM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: >> On Fri, Aug 02, 2019 at 05:40:07PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: >>>> This must be a proper barrier, like a spinlock, mutex, or >>>> synchronize_rcu. >>> >>> I start with synchronize_rcu() but both you and Michael raise som...

I have a Rails application where I need to search. Every time an update happens to something I need to update the index for the changed and related document. As I currently have to run on Windows (and therefore can''t use the native extension) it is quite slow to index sometimes and the user have to wait a couple of seconds for the save operation to return. A thought is to put this

On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 09:36:13AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 9:26 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > > As a result of backporting a bugfix, virtio_net started passing void * > > to page_address, assuming that it will get silently converted to struct > > pag...

On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 09:36:13AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 9:26 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > > As a result of backporting a bugfix, virtio_net started passing void * > > to page_address, assuming that it will get silently converted to struct > > pag...

"Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@redhat.com> writes: > On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 11:55:13AM +0100, Milan Zamazal wrote: >> Hi, we experienced a strange, non-reproducible error after a successful >> migration to another host. When we called virDomainDestroyFlags with >> VIR_DOMAIN_DESTROY_GRACEFUL flag after the migration on the source host, >> we got VIR_ERR_OPERA...

Hi, I was reading about the Yahoo! library recently and was really excited by the idea that I wouldn''t have to branch for IE in my event handlers. Is there any chance that such abstraction will come to Prototype? Thanks, Sam

On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 10:28:13AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote: > On 05/14/2014 09:47 AM, Francesco Romani wrote: > > Hello, > > > > AFAIK, aliases cannot be set for Graphics devices. I tried this very simple experiment > > with libvirt 1.2.4 (from virt-preview on F20) > > > > relevant part of th...

Folks, I have got a strange behaviour when testing this: sum(x) != 1 let us set x<-c(70,134,1,5,0) and transform it in a vector of probabilities x<-x/sum(x) One expect sum(x) should be equal to 1, which is apparently the case > sum(x) [1] 1 However, when I try to test it I get: > if(sum(x) !=1) print("lost") else ("OK") [1] "lost" Which means

It seems that the BTRFS_IOC_CLONE ioctl fails when trying to do a cross-subvolume clone of a file. Chris Mason suggested in the past ([1]) that this should be possible. Am I missing something? [1] http://kerneltrap.org/mailarchive/linux-btrfs/2010/6/10/6884911 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to

Hi all, I am trying to install a version of Libvirt that will be compatible with qemu-kvm-1.1 but I cannot seem to get Libvirt to compile. During the make portion of the install I get the following error: ... make[4]: Entering directory `/home/shawn/libvirt-0.10.0/docs' Generating 404.html.tmp /bin/bash: line 5: 59204 Segmentation fault /usr/bin/xsltproc --stringparam pagename $name