Hey, I just read about btrfs, and since the one thing about ZFS that really impressed me was its protection of data integrity, I'm pretty excited about btrfs. Anyway, what I wanted to know are the requirements kernel and architecture wise. I tried compiling the module on my x86_64 system on kernel 2.6.17. It didn't work, so my questions are: a) Is x86_64 supported? b) Do I need a more recent kernel for btrfs? I didn't take note of the error message I got when trying to compile 0.6 - I'm at work now, so I can't reproduce it immediately. Marco
On Fri, 10 Aug 2007 14:00:53 +0200 Marco Gruss <kork@kork.dyndns.org> wrote:> Hey, > > I just read about btrfs, and since the one thing about > ZFS that really impressed me was its protection of data > integrity, I'm pretty excited about btrfs. > > Anyway, what I wanted to know are the requirements > kernel and architecture wise. I tried compiling the > module on my x86_64 system on kernel 2.6.17. It didn't > work, so my questions are: > > a) Is x86_64 supported?Yes, x86-64 is my primary devel box. I test on i386 as well, though not as extensively.> b) Do I need a more recent kernel for btrfs?Yes, you'll need something around 2.6.20 or so to compile without any patches. I'd suggest 2.6.22. Please keep in mind that things are very alpha right now, it should only be used for experimentation. -chris
Apparently Analagous Threads
- Requirements for btrfs
- btrfs 0.13 and XFS comparison
- kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/volumes.c:3707 still not fixed in 3.7.1 (btrfs-zero-log required) but shown as "RIP btrfs_num_copies"
- btrfs filesystem balance /mnt/btrfs -> segmentation fault (kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/relocation.c:3296!)
- [Btrfs-next] bulid failure at fs/btrfs/ctree.h