Ishfaq Malik
2013-Mar-26 10:22 UTC
[asterisk-users] Fundemental changes to CDR within single asterisk family
Hi In asterisk 1.8.7.0, an inbound call that was transferred to another peer would have 2 cdr entries. In asterisk 1.8.18.0 this same activity has a single cdr entry. This is a rather large and fundamental change to be enacting halfway through a single family branch, was there any reason why this happened? It means we can't upgrade without doing significant extra development and testing. Regards Ish -- Ishfaq Malik <ish at pack-net.co.uk> Department: VOIP Support Company: Packnet Limited t: +44 (0)845 004 4994 f: +44 (0)161 660 9825 e: ish at pack-net.co.uk w: http://www.pack-net.co.uk Registered Address: PACKNET LIMITED, 2A ENTERPRISE HOUSE, LLOYD STREET NORTH, MANCHESTER SCIENCE PARK, MANCHESTER, M156SE COMPANY REG NO. 04920552
Matthew Jordan
2013-Mar-26 12:26 UTC
[asterisk-users] Fundemental changes to CDR within single asterisk family
On 03/26/2013 05:22 AM, Ishfaq Malik wrote:> Hi > > In asterisk 1.8.7.0, an inbound call that was transferred to another > peer would have 2 cdr entries. > > In asterisk 1.8.18.0 this same activity has a single cdr entry. > > This is a rather large and fundamental change to be enacting halfway > through a single family branch, was there any reason why this happened? > It means we can't upgrade without doing significant extra development > and testing. >This was most likely an unintended consequence of some other change (most likely dealing with masquerades). Is 1.8.18.0 the exact version when the behaviour changed? Just so I'm clear on the scenario, what are the channel technologies involved? Is the transfer initiated via a protocol message or via a DTMF feature? Thanks, Matt -- Matthew Jordan Digium, Inc. | Engineering Manager 445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA Check us out at: http://digium.com & http://asterisk.org