Displaying 20 results from an estimated 27 matches for "fundemental".
Did you mean:
fundamental
2013 Mar 26
1
Fundemental changes to CDR within single asterisk family
Hi
In asterisk 1.8.7.0, an inbound call that was transferred to another
peer would have 2 cdr entries.
In asterisk 1.8.18.0 this same activity has a single cdr entry.
This is a rather large and fundamental change to be enacting halfway
through a single family branch, was there any reason why this happened?
It means we can't upgrade without doing significant extra development
and testing.
2016 Aug 24
2
Request suggestions about how to remove redundencies caused by SCEV expansion fundementally
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 3:07 PM, Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin.org> wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 3:57 PM, Wei Mi via llvm-dev
> <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>>
>> SCEV expansion sometimes generates redundent expr even if there is an
>> available expr which can be reused. The redundent exprs can be a lot
>> different from existing
2016 Aug 24
3
Request suggestions about how to remove redundencies caused by SCEV expansion fundementally
> On Aug 23, 2016, at 11:30 PM, Sanjoy Das <sanjoy at playingwithpointers.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Wei,
>
> I've not seen GCC's SCEV so I cannot make a comparative comment here
> (maybe Chris, Andy or Dan can chime in here), but I personally am in
> the "make the cleanup passes smarter" camp. We can also try to make
> SCEV expansion smarter -- not by
2016 Aug 24
3
Request suggestions about how to remove redundencies caused by SCEV expansion fundementally
Hi Wei,
Wei Mi wrote:
> Sanjoy and Andy, thanks a lot for your suggestions.
>
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 8:53 AM, Andrew Trick<atrick at apple.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Aug 23, 2016, at 11:30 PM, Sanjoy
Das<sanjoy at playingwithpointers.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Wei,
>>>
>>> I've not seen GCC's SCEV so I cannot
2016 Aug 19
4
Request suggestions about how to remove redundencies caused by SCEV expansion fundementally
SCEV expansion sometimes generates redundent expr even if there is an
available expr which can be reused. The redundent exprs can be a lot
different from existing exprs so that existing cleanup passes cannot
remove them.
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=24920
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=24442
https://reviews.llvm.org/D12090 and https://reviews.llvm.org/D21313
already relieved the
2016 Aug 29
4
Request suggestions about how to remove redundencies caused by SCEV expansion fundementally
...berlin.org>
>> Cc: "llvm-dev" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>, "David Li" <davidxl at google.com>
>> Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2016 5:41:12 PM
>> Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] Request suggestions about how to remove redundencies caused by SCEV expansion fundementally
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 3:07 PM, Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin.org>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 3:57 PM, Wei Mi via llvm-dev
>> > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>...
2002 Dec 26
8
Is this just anti-Ogg FUD?
...liking ogg) but he also made some claims that I wanted to
follow-up on.
I've modified his email and included the points below. Each paragraph is a
claim. I would very much appreciate some public discussion. Is there truth
to his claims? Thoughts?
-- start of email --
Ogg has to this day, fundemental problems with low frequency encoding.
Sometimes refered to as "pre-echo aliasing" ... it is something that is a
problem for music (primarly electronic which is why I don't use it) with
low end bass and subsonics. If you have the ability to test this on a
proper sound system, you w...
2003 Mar 27
6
Access to shares for authenticated domain users only
I am running several samba servers (2.2.3a and 2.2.7) in various places as
pdcs. Everything seems to be running smoothly, but I can't find any way of
restricting access to only those uses who have logged on to the domain. Is
this possible? ie at the moment, any user can map a drive to \\server\share,
put in a valid user/password pair and have access to that share without
going through any
2005 Mar 11
0
Re: Incoming echo cancel
...r the style of filter
- Continuous variations in the 'length' of the echo tail on the _incoming_side_ of the T1 causing the filters to continuously adapt (perhaps caused by 'slips' in the interface/timing system onboard the card?)
- Coding errors in the MMX vs. non-MMX routines
- Fundemental differences between the audio signals being passed to the customers depending on the service providers facilities (eg. variations in level padding: http://yarchive.net/phone/digital_pads.html)
Of all of these, I remain convinced that in most cases the real issue is something like the last. Namely...
2005 May 02
1
browsing via vpn problem
...OUP group
(type 1E) is giving an address 0.0.0.0 is this normal?
my smb.conf is:
interfaces = 10.8.0.1/255.255.255.0
bind interfaces only = true
wins support = true
dns proxy = false
workgroup = WORKGROUP
announce as = NT
announce version = 5.2
domain master = yes
local master = no
Have I made a fundemental setup error? if anyone can help it would be much
appreciated.
Markus
2007 Mar 12
2
How To Recover From Creating >2TB ext3 Filesystem on MSDOS Partition Table?
(I've already sent this message to Ted Ts'o directly. I should
have sent it to this list first but I didn't know about it
until today. My apologies to Ted.)
Last Friday a system that I just inherited refused to mount
a file system that had been working fine for about 6 months.
This is on a Scientific Linux 4.3 system using a 2.6.9
kernel. This is another Linux distribution based on
2015 Apr 20
2
[LLVMdev] SmallString + raw_svector_ostream combination should be more efficient
...way or
another, we got burned by it multiple times and it should be replaced.
Alp suggested a derived class containing its own SmallString. That's a
simple and effective approach to avoid the bugs mentioned but does not fix
the memory or runtime issues. Small as they may be, why have them at a
fundemental data structure?
I was thinking about going further avoiding all duplication with a
templated class derived with its own internal buffer storage.
Rafael suggested a more modular approach, a derived adpater class adapter
to a *simple* buffer (or nullptr for fully-dynamic operation) which also
won...
2002 Nov 06
0
[LLVMdev] DSGraph implementation status update
...e representation is basically frozen (haven't I said
this before?), there is still stuff to do:
1. A new "Globals" graph will be added, which will optimize some
situations due to programs that use lots of global variables, or call
lots of external functions. This shouldn't fundementally change the
interface at all.
2. The heuristics can be improved slightly, improving the quality of the
generated graphs. Basically, right now if something happens that
cannot be represented in the graph, the node in question is collapsed,
losing all field sensitivity. Because some &q...
2004 Jan 08
0
[LLVMdev] Re: idea 10
Hello Chris,
Thursday, January 8, 2004, 5:28:47 PM, you wrote:
CL> Though I am mostly ignorant about leading edge distributed (i.e., loosely
CL> coupled parallel) programming stuff, I _think_ that network latencies are
CL> such that you really need the "big picture" of what a program is doing to
CL> know how to profitably distribute and adapt the program to the environment
2015 Apr 30
2
[LLVMdev] SmallString + raw_svector_ostream combination should be more efficient
...times and it should be replaced.
>>
>> Alp suggested a derived class containing its own SmallString. That's a
>> simple and effective approach to avoid the bugs mentioned but does not fix
>> the memory or runtime issues. Small as they may be, why have them at a
>> fundemental data structure?
>>
>> I was thinking about going further avoiding all duplication with a
>> templated class derived with its own internal buffer storage.
>>
>> Rafael suggested a more modular approach, a derived adpater class adapter
>> to a *simple* buffer (or n...
2014 Aug 05
2
[LLVMdev] Warning about variable optimized away?
Hello,
it it possible to get a kind of diagnostics if the variable
is totally optimized away? For example, in:
void foo (struct some_type *obj) {
... some code where 'obj' is not used ...
bar (obj->some_member);
... some code where 'obj' is not used again ...
baz (obj->some_member);
}
'obj' is likely to be optimized away so only
2008 Mar 07
2
Future enhancement of imap: sorting?
...y lightweight clients don't support sorting at
all. On the flip side, in distributed mail envrionments sorting at
delivery time isn't feasible, as you typically have the entire mailspool
owned by a single UID and mounted via NFS. My basic point is that the two
paradigms for sorting have fundemental flaws that severaly limit them.
It occured to me that it would be ideal to enable sorting in the imap
daemon, enabling users to implement sorting rules which are stored in
their directory (similar to the other imap metadata), and which get
invoked whenever mail is checked. Perhaps that is beyon...
2006 Oct 31
7
FXO Cards vs. Channel bank with T1
Is there any advantage of getting a T1 card with a channel bank over 2-3 FXO cards ?
Thanks.
Dovid
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20061031/0f74ec67/attachment.htm
2015 May 02
2
[LLVMdev] SmallString + raw_svector_ostream combination should be more efficient
...t;> >> Alp suggested a derived class containing its own SmallString. That's a
>> >> simple and effective approach to avoid the bugs mentioned but does not
>> fix
>> >> the memory or runtime issues. Small as they may be, why have them at a
>> >> fundemental data structure?
>> >>
>> >> I was thinking about going further avoiding all duplication with a
>> >> templated class derived with its own internal buffer storage.
>> >>
>> >> Rafael suggested a more modular approach, a derived adpater clas...
2004 Jan 08
2
[LLVMdev] Re: idea 10
Just a few notes from the peanut gallery... note that I can't really say
what is and is not possible with LLVM, I can just talk about our plans
(which we believe to be possible). If you guys are really interested in
this stuff, try hacking something together and see if it works! :)
On Thu, 8 Jan 2004, [koi8-r] "Valery A.Khamenya[koi8-r] " wrote:
>
> Indeed, LLVM will