search for: fundement

Hi In asterisk 1.8.7.0, an inbound call that was transferred to another peer would have 2 cdr entries. In asterisk 1.8.18.0 this same activity has a single cdr entry. This is a rather large and fundamental change to be enacting halfway through a single family branch, was there any reason why this happened? It means we can't upgrade without doing significant extra development and testing.

On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 3:07 PM, Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin.org> wrote: > > > On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 3:57 PM, Wei Mi via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >> SCEV expansion sometimes generates redundent expr even if there is an >> available expr which can be reused. The redundent exprs can be a lot >> different from existing

> On Aug 23, 2016, at 11:30 PM, Sanjoy Das <sanjoy at playingwithpointers.com> wrote: > > Hi Wei, > > I've not seen GCC's SCEV so I cannot make a comparative comment here > (maybe Chris, Andy or Dan can chime in here), but I personally am in > the "make the cleanup passes smarter" camp. We can also try to make > SCEV expansion smarter -- not by

Hi Wei, Wei Mi wrote: > Sanjoy and Andy, thanks a lot for your suggestions. > > On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 8:53 AM, Andrew Trick<atrick at apple.com> wrote: >> >>> On Aug 23, 2016, at 11:30 PM, Sanjoy Das<sanjoy at playingwithpointers.com> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Wei, >>> >>> I've not seen GCC's SCEV so I cannot

SCEV expansion sometimes generates redundent expr even if there is an available expr which can be reused. The redundent exprs can be a lot different from existing exprs so that existing cleanup passes cannot remove them. https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=24920 https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=24442 https://reviews.llvm.org/D12090 and https://reviews.llvm.org/D21313 already relieved the

...berlin.org> >> Cc: "llvm-dev" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>, "David Li" <davidxl at google.com> >> Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2016 5:41:12 PM >> Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] Request suggestions about how to remove redundencies caused by SCEV expansion fundementally >> >> On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 3:07 PM, Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin.org> >> wrote: >> > >> > >> > On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 3:57 PM, Wei Mi via llvm-dev >> > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >> >> >&...

...liking ogg) but he also made some claims that I wanted to follow-up on. I've modified his email and included the points below. Each paragraph is a claim. I would very much appreciate some public discussion. Is there truth to his claims? Thoughts? -- start of email -- Ogg has to this day, fundemental problems with low frequency encoding. Sometimes refered to as "pre-echo aliasing" ... it is something that is a problem for music (primarly electronic which is why I don't use it) with low end bass and subsonics. If you have the ability to test this on a proper sound system, you...

I am running several samba servers (2.2.3a and 2.2.7) in various places as pdcs. Everything seems to be running smoothly, but I can't find any way of restricting access to only those uses who have logged on to the domain. Is this possible? ie at the moment, any user can map a drive to \\server\share, put in a valid user/password pair and have access to that share without going through any

...r the style of filter - Continuous variations in the 'length' of the echo tail on the _incoming_side_ of the T1 causing the filters to continuously adapt (perhaps caused by 'slips' in the interface/timing system onboard the card?) - Coding errors in the MMX vs. non-MMX routines - Fundemental differences between the audio signals being passed to the customers depending on the service providers facilities (eg. variations in level padding: http://yarchive.net/phone/digital_pads.html) Of all of these, I remain convinced that in most cases the real issue is something like the last. Namel...

...OUP group (type 1E) is giving an address 0.0.0.0 is this normal? my smb.conf is: interfaces = 10.8.0.1/255.255.255.0 bind interfaces only = true wins support = true dns proxy = false workgroup = WORKGROUP announce as = NT announce version = 5.2 domain master = yes local master = no Have I made a fundemental setup error? if anyone can help it would be much appreciated. Markus

(I've already sent this message to Ted Ts'o directly. I should have sent it to this list first but I didn't know about it until today. My apologies to Ted.) Last Friday a system that I just inherited refused to mount a file system that had been working fine for about 6 months. This is on a Scientific Linux 4.3 system using a 2.6.9 kernel. This is another Linux distribution based on

...way or another, we got burned by it multiple times and it should be replaced. Alp suggested a derived class containing its own SmallString. That's a simple and effective approach to avoid the bugs mentioned but does not fix the memory or runtime issues. Small as they may be, why have them at a fundemental data structure? I was thinking about going further avoiding all duplication with a templated class derived with its own internal buffer storage. Rafael suggested a more modular approach, a derived adpater class adapter to a *simple* buffer (or nullptr for fully-dynamic operation) which also won...

...e representation is basically frozen (haven't I said this before?), there is still stuff to do: 1. A new "Globals" graph will be added, which will optimize some situations due to programs that use lots of global variables, or call lots of external functions. This shouldn't fundementally change the interface at all. 2. The heuristics can be improved slightly, improving the quality of the generated graphs. Basically, right now if something happens that cannot be represented in the graph, the node in question is collapsed, losing all field sensitivity. Because some...

Hello Chris, Thursday, January 8, 2004, 5:28:47 PM, you wrote: CL> Though I am mostly ignorant about leading edge distributed (i.e., loosely CL> coupled parallel) programming stuff, I _think_ that network latencies are CL> such that you really need the "big picture" of what a program is doing to CL> know how to profitably distribute and adapt the program to the environment

...times and it should be replaced. >> >> Alp suggested a derived class containing its own SmallString. That's a >> simple and effective approach to avoid the bugs mentioned but does not fix >> the memory or runtime issues. Small as they may be, why have them at a >> fundemental data structure? >> >> I was thinking about going further avoiding all duplication with a >> templated class derived with its own internal buffer storage. >> >> Rafael suggested a more modular approach, a derived adpater class adapter >> to a *simple* buffer (or...

Hello, it it possible to get a kind of diagnostics if the variable is totally optimized away? For example, in: void foo (struct some_type *obj) { ... some code where 'obj' is not used ... bar (obj->some_member); ... some code where 'obj' is not used again ... baz (obj->some_member); } 'obj' is likely to be optimized away so only

...y lightweight clients don't support sorting at all. On the flip side, in distributed mail envrionments sorting at delivery time isn't feasible, as you typically have the entire mailspool owned by a single UID and mounted via NFS. My basic point is that the two paradigms for sorting have fundemental flaws that severaly limit them. It occured to me that it would be ideal to enable sorting in the imap daemon, enabling users to implement sorting rules which are stored in their directory (similar to the other imap metadata), and which get invoked whenever mail is checked. Perhaps that is bey...

Is there any advantage of getting a T1 card with a channel bank over 2-3 FXO cards ? Thanks. Dovid -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20061031/0f74ec67/attachment.htm

...t;> >> Alp suggested a derived class containing its own SmallString. That's a >> >> simple and effective approach to avoid the bugs mentioned but does not >> fix >> >> the memory or runtime issues. Small as they may be, why have them at a >> >> fundemental data structure? >> >> >> >> I was thinking about going further avoiding all duplication with a >> >> templated class derived with its own internal buffer storage. >> >> >> >> Rafael suggested a more modular approach, a derived adpater cl...

Just a few notes from the peanut gallery... note that I can't really say what is and is not possible with LLVM, I can just talk about our plans (which we believe to be possible). If you guys are really interested in this stuff, try hacking something together and see if it works! :) On Thu, 8 Jan 2004, [koi8-r] "Valery A.Khamenya[koi8-r] " wrote: > > Indeed, LLVM will