thr3ads.net - asterisk users - [asterisk-users] Problem with zaptel drivers or card [Jan 2007]

If this information is useful, please help other people find it:
Share via:

Administrator

2007-Jan-09 18:01 UTC

[asterisk-users] Problem with zaptel drivers or card

I have an Asterisk box running Fedora Core 4, Asterisk 1.4, Lippri, 1.4, and
Zaptel 1.4

The Digium cards installed are TDM2400 and TE110P.

Everything was working fine until I upgraded to zaptel 1.2.12 from 1.2.9

Now when I run ztcfg I get the following error message:

(CAS signalling on span 2 conflicts with Clear channel on channel 40)

--NOTE: signaling was spelled wrong in the error message--

I have since upgraded to 1.4 with the same problem.

Channel 40 is a standard bchan configuration and our provider sees no
problem with the channel.

When I disable the channel everything works fine.

My assumption is that something is wrong with the TE110P card.

Has anyone seen anything else like this?

 

 

James Hawks

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20070109/88e94fd4/attachment.htm

Tzafrir Cohen

2007-Jan-09 23:25 UTC

head link

[asterisk-users] Problem with zaptel drivers or card

On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 06:01:55PM -0700, Administrator
wrote:> I have an Asterisk box running Fedora Core 4, Asterisk 1.4, Lippri, 1.4,
and
> Zaptel 1.4
> 
> The Digium cards installed are TDM2400 and TE110P.
> 
> Everything was working fine until I upgraded to zaptel 1.2.12 from 1.2.9
> 
> Now when I run ztcfg I get the following error message:
> 
> (CAS signalling on span 2 conflicts with Clear channel on channel 40)
> 
> --NOTE: signaling was spelled wrong in the error message--
> 
> I have since upgraded to 1.4 with the same problem.
> 
> Channel 40 is a standard bchan configuration and our provider sees no
> problem with the channel.
> 
> When I disable the channel everything works fine.
> 
> My assumption is that something is wrong with the TE110P card.
> 
> Has anyone seen anything else like this?
What do you get from:

cat /proc/zaptel/*

What do you have on /etc/zaptel.conf  ?

-- 
               Tzafrir Cohen       
icq#16849755                    jabber:tzafrir@jabber.org
+972-50-7952406           mailto:tzafrir.cohen@xorcom.com       
http://www.xorcom.com  iax:guest@local.xorcom.com/tzafrir

Matthew Fredrickson

2007-Jan-10 08:02 UTC

head link

[asterisk-users] Problem with zaptel drivers or card

On Jan 9, 2007, at 7:01 PM, Administrator wrote:
> I have an Asterisk box running Fedora Core 4, Asterisk 1.4, Lippri, 
> 1.4, and Zaptel 1.4
> The Digium cards installed are TDM2400 and TE110P.
> Everything was working fine until I upgraded to zaptel 1.2.12 from 
> 1.2.9
> Now when I run ztcfg I get the following error message:
> (CAS signalling on span 2 conflicts with Clear channel on channel 40)
> --NOTE: signaling was spelled wrong in the error message--
> I have since upgraded to 1.4 with the same problem.
> Channel 40 is a standard bchan configuration and our provider sees no 
> problem with the channel.
> When I disable the channel everything works fine.
> My assumption is that something is wrong with the TE110P card.
> Has anyone seen anything else like this?
What's in your zaptel.conf and can you post the output of `cat 
/proc/zaptel/1` and `cat /proc/zaptel/2`?

Matthew Fredrickson

Administrator

2007-Jan-10 09:39 UTC

head link

[asterisk-users] Problem with zaptel drivers or card

Results From cat /proc/zaptel/*

Span 1: WCTDM/0 "Wildcard TDM2400P Board 1"
        IRQ misses: 24

           1 WCTDM/0/0 FXOKS (In use)
           2 WCTDM/0/1 FXOKS (In use)
           3 WCTDM/0/2 FXOKS (In use)
           4 WCTDM/0/3 FXOKS (In use)
           5 WCTDM/0/4 FXOKS (In use)
           6 WCTDM/0/5 FXOKS (In use)
           7 WCTDM/0/6 FXOKS (In use)
           8 WCTDM/0/7 FXOKS (In use)
           9 WCTDM/0/8 FXOKS (In use)
          10 WCTDM/0/9 FXOKS (In use)
          11 WCTDM/0/10 FXOKS (In use)
          12 WCTDM/0/11 FXOKS (In use)
          13 WCTDM/0/12 FXOKS (In use)
          14 WCTDM/0/13 FXOKS (In use)
          15 WCTDM/0/14 FXOKS (In use)
          16 WCTDM/0/15 FXOKS (In use)
          17 WCTDM/0/16 FXOKS (In use)
          18 WCTDM/0/17 FXOKS (In use)
          19 WCTDM/0/18 FXOKS (In use)
          20 WCTDM/0/19 FXOKS (In use)
          21 WCTDM/0/20 FXOKS (In use)
          22 WCTDM/0/21 FXOKS (In use)
          23 WCTDM/0/22 FXOKS (In use)
          24 WCTDM/0/23 FXOKS (In use)
Span 2: WCT1/0 "Digium Wildcard TE110P T1/E1 Card 0" B8ZS/ESF

          25 WCT1/0/1 Clear (In use)
          26 WCT1/0/2 Clear (In use)
          27 WCT1/0/3 Clear (In use)
          28 WCT1/0/4 Clear (In use)
          29 WCT1/0/5 Clear (In use)
          30 WCT1/0/6 Clear (In use)
          31 WCT1/0/7 Clear (In use)
          32 WCT1/0/8 Clear (In use)
          33 WCT1/0/9 Clear (In use)
          34 WCT1/0/10 Clear (In use)
          35 WCT1/0/11 Clear (In use)
          36 WCT1/0/12 Clear (In use)
          37 WCT1/0/13 Clear (In use)
          38 WCT1/0/14 Clear (In use)
          39 WCT1/0/15 Clear (In use)
          40 WCT1/0/16
          41 WCT1/0/17 Clear (In use)
          42 WCT1/0/18 Clear (In use)
          43 WCT1/0/19 Clear (In use)
          44 WCT1/0/20 Clear (In use)
          45 WCT1/0/21 Clear (In use)
          46 WCT1/0/22 Clear (In use)
          47 WCT1/0/23 Clear (In use)
          48 WCT1/0/24 HDLCFCS (In use)

zaptel.conf file:

fxoks=1-24
span=2,1,0,esf,b8zs
bchan=25-39
#bchan=40
bchan=41-47
dchan=48
loadzone=us
defaultzone=us

James

-----Original Message-----
From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Tzafrir Cohen
Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2007 11:25 PM
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Problem with zaptel drivers or card

On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 06:01:55PM -0700, Administrator
wrote:> I have an Asterisk box running Fedora Core 4, Asterisk 1.4, Lippri, 1.4,
and> Zaptel 1.4
> 
> The Digium cards installed are TDM2400 and TE110P.
> 
> Everything was working fine until I upgraded to zaptel 1.2.12 from 1.2.9
> 
> Now when I run ztcfg I get the following error message:
> 
> (CAS signalling on span 2 conflicts with Clear channel on channel 40)
> 
> --NOTE: signaling was spelled wrong in the error message--
> 
> I have since upgraded to 1.4 with the same problem.
> 
> Channel 40 is a standard bchan configuration and our provider sees no
> problem with the channel.
> 
> When I disable the channel everything works fine.
> 
> My assumption is that something is wrong with the TE110P card.
> 
> Has anyone seen anything else like this?
What do you get from:

cat /proc/zaptel/*

What do you have on /etc/zaptel.conf  ?

-- 
               Tzafrir Cohen       
icq#16849755                    jabber:tzafrir@jabber.org
+972-50-7952406           mailto:tzafrir.cohen@xorcom.com       
http://www.xorcom.com  iax:guest@local.xorcom.com/tzafrir
_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Tzafrir Cohen

2007-Jan-10 10:05 UTC

head link

[asterisk-users] Problem with zaptel drivers or card

On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 09:39:47AM -0700, Administrator
wrote:> Results From cat /proc/zaptel/*
> 
> Span 1: WCTDM/0 "Wildcard TDM2400P Board 1"
>         IRQ misses: 24
> 
>            1 WCTDM/0/0 FXOKS (In use)
>            2 WCTDM/0/1 FXOKS (In use)
>            3 WCTDM/0/2 FXOKS (In use)
>            4 WCTDM/0/3 FXOKS (In use)
>            5 WCTDM/0/4 FXOKS (In use)
>            6 WCTDM/0/5 FXOKS (In use)
>            7 WCTDM/0/6 FXOKS (In use)
>            8 WCTDM/0/7 FXOKS (In use)
>            9 WCTDM/0/8 FXOKS (In use)
>           10 WCTDM/0/9 FXOKS (In use)
>           11 WCTDM/0/10 FXOKS (In use)
>           12 WCTDM/0/11 FXOKS (In use)
>           13 WCTDM/0/12 FXOKS (In use)
>           14 WCTDM/0/13 FXOKS (In use)
>           15 WCTDM/0/14 FXOKS (In use)
>           16 WCTDM/0/15 FXOKS (In use)
>           17 WCTDM/0/16 FXOKS (In use)
>           18 WCTDM/0/17 FXOKS (In use)
>           19 WCTDM/0/18 FXOKS (In use)
>           20 WCTDM/0/19 FXOKS (In use)
>           21 WCTDM/0/20 FXOKS (In use)
>           22 WCTDM/0/21 FXOKS (In use)
>           23 WCTDM/0/22 FXOKS (In use)
>           24 WCTDM/0/23 FXOKS (In use)
> Span 2: WCT1/0 "Digium Wildcard TE110P T1/E1 Card 0" B8ZS/ESF
> 
>           25 WCT1/0/1 Clear (In use)
>           26 WCT1/0/2 Clear (In use)
>           27 WCT1/0/3 Clear (In use)
>           28 WCT1/0/4 Clear (In use)
>           29 WCT1/0/5 Clear (In use)
>           30 WCT1/0/6 Clear (In use)
>           31 WCT1/0/7 Clear (In use)
>           32 WCT1/0/8 Clear (In use)
>           33 WCT1/0/9 Clear (In use)
>           34 WCT1/0/10 Clear (In use)
>           35 WCT1/0/11 Clear (In use)
>           36 WCT1/0/12 Clear (In use)
>           37 WCT1/0/13 Clear (In use)
>           38 WCT1/0/14 Clear (In use)
>           39 WCT1/0/15 Clear (In use)
>           40 WCT1/0/16
>           41 WCT1/0/17 Clear (In use)
>           42 WCT1/0/18 Clear (In use)
>           43 WCT1/0/19 Clear (In use)
>           44 WCT1/0/20 Clear (In use)
>           45 WCT1/0/21 Clear (In use)
>           46 WCT1/0/22 Clear (In use)
>           47 WCT1/0/23 Clear (In use)
>           48 WCT1/0/24 HDLCFCS (In use)
Is it supposed to be T1 or E1?

The card behaves as E1 but you attempt to configure it as T1.
> 
> zaptel.conf file:
> 
> fxoks=1-24
> span=2,1,0,esf,b8zs
> bchan=25-39
> #bchan=40
> bchan=41-47
> dchan=48
> loadzone=us
> defaultzone=us
> 
> James
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com
> [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Tzafrir Cohen
> Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2007 11:25 PM
> To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
> Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Problem with zaptel drivers or card
> 
> On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 06:01:55PM -0700, Administrator wrote:
> > I have an Asterisk box running Fedora Core 4, Asterisk 1.4, Lippri,
1.4,
> and
> > Zaptel 1.4
> > 
> > The Digium cards installed are TDM2400 and TE110P.
> > 
> > Everything was working fine until I upgraded to zaptel 1.2.12 from
1.2.9
> > 
> > Now when I run ztcfg I get the following error message:
> > 
> > (CAS signalling on span 2 conflicts with Clear channel on channel 40)
> > 
> > --NOTE: signaling was spelled wrong in the error message--
> > 
> > I have since upgraded to 1.4 with the same problem.
> > 
> > Channel 40 is a standard bchan configuration and our provider sees no
> > problem with the channel.
> > 
> > When I disable the channel everything works fine.
> > 
> > My assumption is that something is wrong with the TE110P card.
> > 
> > Has anyone seen anything else like this?
> 
> What do you get from:
> 
> cat /proc/zaptel/*
> 
> What do you have on /etc/zaptel.conf  ?
> 
> -- 
>                Tzafrir Cohen       
> icq#16849755                    jabber:tzafrir@jabber.org
> +972-50-7952406           mailto:tzafrir.cohen@xorcom.com       
> http://www.xorcom.com  iax:guest@local.xorcom.com/tzafrir
> _______________________________________________
> --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
> 
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
> 
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> 
-- 
               Tzafrir Cohen       
icq#16849755                    jabber:tzafrir@jabber.org
+972-50-7952406           mailto:tzafrir.cohen@xorcom.com       
http://www.xorcom.com  iax:guest@local.xorcom.com/tzafrir

Administrator

2007-Jan-10 11:03 UTC

head link

[asterisk-users] Problem with zaptel drivers or card

It is a T1 and I am not sure what you mean by behaves like an E1. The
connection is a T1 with 23 b-channels and 1 d-channel. I think it just so
happens that the problem channel is 16 on the card. This worked fine for
over a year before the upgrade to the zaptel drivers.

 
James 

-----Original Message-----
From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Tzafrir Cohen
Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2007 10:06 AM
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Problem with zaptel drivers or card

On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 09:39:47AM -0700, Administrator
wrote:> Results From cat /proc/zaptel/*
> 
> Span 1: WCTDM/0 "Wildcard TDM2400P Board 1"
>         IRQ misses: 24
> 
>            1 WCTDM/0/0 FXOKS (In use)
>            2 WCTDM/0/1 FXOKS (In use)
>            3 WCTDM/0/2 FXOKS (In use)
>            4 WCTDM/0/3 FXOKS (In use)
>            5 WCTDM/0/4 FXOKS (In use)
>            6 WCTDM/0/5 FXOKS (In use)
>            7 WCTDM/0/6 FXOKS (In use)
>            8 WCTDM/0/7 FXOKS (In use)
>            9 WCTDM/0/8 FXOKS (In use)
>           10 WCTDM/0/9 FXOKS (In use)
>           11 WCTDM/0/10 FXOKS (In use)
>           12 WCTDM/0/11 FXOKS (In use)
>           13 WCTDM/0/12 FXOKS (In use)
>           14 WCTDM/0/13 FXOKS (In use)
>           15 WCTDM/0/14 FXOKS (In use)
>           16 WCTDM/0/15 FXOKS (In use)
>           17 WCTDM/0/16 FXOKS (In use)
>           18 WCTDM/0/17 FXOKS (In use)
>           19 WCTDM/0/18 FXOKS (In use)
>           20 WCTDM/0/19 FXOKS (In use)
>           21 WCTDM/0/20 FXOKS (In use)
>           22 WCTDM/0/21 FXOKS (In use)
>           23 WCTDM/0/22 FXOKS (In use)
>           24 WCTDM/0/23 FXOKS (In use)
> Span 2: WCT1/0 "Digium Wildcard TE110P T1/E1 Card 0" B8ZS/ESF
> 
>           25 WCT1/0/1 Clear (In use)
>           26 WCT1/0/2 Clear (In use)
>           27 WCT1/0/3 Clear (In use)
>           28 WCT1/0/4 Clear (In use)
>           29 WCT1/0/5 Clear (In use)
>           30 WCT1/0/6 Clear (In use)
>           31 WCT1/0/7 Clear (In use)
>           32 WCT1/0/8 Clear (In use)
>           33 WCT1/0/9 Clear (In use)
>           34 WCT1/0/10 Clear (In use)
>           35 WCT1/0/11 Clear (In use)
>           36 WCT1/0/12 Clear (In use)
>           37 WCT1/0/13 Clear (In use)
>           38 WCT1/0/14 Clear (In use)
>           39 WCT1/0/15 Clear (In use)
>           40 WCT1/0/16
>           41 WCT1/0/17 Clear (In use)
>           42 WCT1/0/18 Clear (In use)
>           43 WCT1/0/19 Clear (In use)
>           44 WCT1/0/20 Clear (In use)
>           45 WCT1/0/21 Clear (In use)
>           46 WCT1/0/22 Clear (In use)
>           47 WCT1/0/23 Clear (In use)
>           48 WCT1/0/24 HDLCFCS (In use)
Is it supposed to be T1 or E1?

The card behaves as E1 but you attempt to configure it as T1.
> 
> zaptel.conf file:
> 
> fxoks=1-24
> span=2,1,0,esf,b8zs
> bchan=25-39
> #bchan=40
> bchan=41-47
> dchan=48
> loadzone=us
> defaultzone=us
> 
> James
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com
> [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Tzafrir
Cohen> Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2007 11:25 PM
> To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
> Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Problem with zaptel drivers or card
> 
> On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 06:01:55PM -0700, Administrator wrote:
> > I have an Asterisk box running Fedora Core 4, Asterisk 1.4, Lippri,
1.4,
> and
> > Zaptel 1.4
> > 
> > The Digium cards installed are TDM2400 and TE110P.
> > 
> > Everything was working fine until I upgraded to zaptel 1.2.12 from
1.2.9
> > 
> > Now when I run ztcfg I get the following error message:
> > 
> > (CAS signalling on span 2 conflicts with Clear channel on channel 40)
> > 
> > --NOTE: signaling was spelled wrong in the error message--
> > 
> > I have since upgraded to 1.4 with the same problem.
> > 
> > Channel 40 is a standard bchan configuration and our provider sees no
> > problem with the channel.
> > 
> > When I disable the channel everything works fine.
> > 
> > My assumption is that something is wrong with the TE110P card.
> > 
> > Has anyone seen anything else like this?
> 
> What do you get from:
> 
> cat /proc/zaptel/*
> 
> What do you have on /etc/zaptel.conf  ?
> 
> -- 
>                Tzafrir Cohen       
> icq#16849755                    jabber:tzafrir@jabber.org
> +972-50-7952406           mailto:tzafrir.cohen@xorcom.com       
> http://www.xorcom.com  iax:guest@local.xorcom.com/tzafrir
> _______________________________________________
> --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
> 
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
> 
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> 
-- 
               Tzafrir Cohen       
icq#16849755                    jabber:tzafrir@jabber.org
+972-50-7952406           mailto:tzafrir.cohen@xorcom.com       
http://www.xorcom.com  iax:guest@local.xorcom.com/tzafrir
_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Joel Vandal

2007-Jan-10 11:52 UTC

head link

[asterisk-users] Problem with zaptel drivers or card

Administrator a ?crit :> It is a T1 and I am not sure what you mean by behaves like an E1. The
> connection is a T1 with 23 b-channels and 1 d-channel. I think it just so
> happens that the problem channel is 16 on the card. This worked fine for
> over a year before the upgrade to the zaptel drivers.
>   I`ve got similar problem and look like the patch #7860 is responsable of 
this issue... like if this patch doesnt check if the line is an E1 or 
T1. I have reverse the patch on 1.2.12 and all work perfectly now.

--
Joel Vandal, CTO
ScopServ Inc.

Administrator

2007-Jan-10 14:18 UTC

head link

[asterisk-users] Problem with zaptel drivers or card

How did you, or do go about reversing the patch?

 
James 


-----Original Message-----
From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Joel Vandal
Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2007 11:52 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Problem with zaptel drivers or card

Administrator a ?crit :> It is a T1 and I am not sure what you mean by behaves like an E1. The
> connection is a T1 with 23 b-channels and 1 d-channel. I think it just so
> happens that the problem channel is 16 on the card. This worked fine for
> over a year before the upgrade to the zaptel drivers.
>   I`ve got similar problem and look like the patch #7860 is responsable of 
this issue... like if this patch doesnt check if the line is an E1 or 
T1. I have reverse the patch on 1.2.12 and all work perfectly now.

--
Joel Vandal, CTO
ScopServ Inc.

_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Joel Vandal

2007-Jan-10 15:09 UTC

head link

[asterisk-users] Problem with zaptel drivers or card

Hi,> How did you, or do go about reversing the patch?
>   I have put the patch (simple) available at :

http://www.scopserv.com/download/patches/zaptel-1.2.12-reverse7860.patch

Go on your zaptel src directory and do :

patch -p0 < zaptel-1.2.12-reverse7860.patch
>> It is a T1 and I am not sure what you mean by behaves like an E1. The
>> connection is a T1 with 23 b-channels and 1 d-channel. I think it just
so
>> happens that the problem channel is 16 on the card. This worked fine
for
>> over a year before the upgrade to the zaptel drivers.
>>   
>>     
> I`ve got similar problem and look like the patch #7860 is responsable of 
> this issue... like if this patch doesnt check if the line is an E1 or 
> T1. I have reverse the patch on 1.2.12 and all work perfectly now.
>
>   
--
Joel Vandal, CTO
ScopServ Inc.

Possibly Parallel Threads

Search for more seemingly similar threads

asterisk users - Jan 2007 - Problem with zaptel drivers or card

[asterisk-users] Problem with zaptel drivers or card

[asterisk-users] Problem with zaptel drivers or card

[asterisk-users] Problem with zaptel drivers or card

[asterisk-users] Problem with zaptel drivers or card

[asterisk-users] Problem with zaptel drivers or card

[asterisk-users] Problem with zaptel drivers or card

[asterisk-users] Problem with zaptel drivers or card

[asterisk-users] Problem with zaptel drivers or card

[asterisk-users] Problem with zaptel drivers or card

Possibly Parallel Threads