The Asterisk Development Team
2008-Apr-22 23:05 UTC
[asterisk-users] [asterisk-announce] Asterisk 1.2.28, 1.4.19.1, and 1.6.0-beta8 Released
The Asterisk development team has released versions 1.2.28, 1.4.19.1, and 1.6.0-beta8. All of these releases contain a security patch for the vulnerability described in the AST-2008-006 security advisory. 1.6.0-beta8 is also a regular update to the 1.6.0 series with a number of bug fixes over the previous beta release. Early last year, we made some modifications to the IAX2 channel driver to combat potential usage of IAX2 in traffic amplification attacks. Unfortunately, our fix was not complete and we were not notified of this until the original reporter of the issue decided to release information on how to exploit it to the public. This issue affects all users of IAX2 that have allowed non-authenticated calls. For more information on the vulnerability, see the published security advisory. * http://downloads.digium.com/pub/security/AST-2008-006.pdf All releases are available for download from the following location: * http://downloads.digium.com/pub/telephony/asterisk/ Thank you for your continued support of Asterisk! _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com-- asterisk-announce mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-announce
Tony Mountifield
2008-Apr-23 09:19 UTC
[asterisk-users] [asterisk-announce] Asterisk 1.2.28, 1.4.19.1, and 1.6.0-beta8 Released
In article <480E6F23.8050909 at digium.com>, The Asterisk Development Team <asteriskteam at digium.com> wrote:> The Asterisk development team has released versions 1.2.28, 1.4.19.1, and > 1.6.0-beta8. > > All of these releases contain a security patch for the vulnerability described > in the AST-2008-006 security advisory. 1.6.0-beta8 is also a regular update to > the 1.6.0 series with a number of bug fixes over the previous beta release.That advisory states that the fix is in 1.4.20, not 1.4.19.1. Why was the 1.4 release tagged as 1.4.19.1? Personally, I prefer all releases to be x.y.z, and don't see the point in doing an x.y.z.a just because a change is small. Cheers Tony -- Tony Mountifield Work: tony at softins.co.uk - http://www.softins.co.uk Play: tony at mountifield.org - http://tony.mountifield.org
Reasonably Related Threads
- Asterisk 1.2.28, 1.4.19.1, and 1.6.0-beta8 Released
- Samba 4: character encoding issue (was: Samba-tool dbcheck shows "incorrect GUID" after update from alpha17 to beta8)
- v1.1.beta8 released
- beta8 starts but no POP3 access
- beta8: complaint about tilde at startup