http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/beta/dovecot-1.1.beta8.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/beta/dovecot-1.1.beta8.tar.gz.sig Changes since beta7: - Added a new "raw" mail storage backend which allows opening files/streams as single mail mailboxes. deliver uses this now instead of opening the incoming mail as a mbox. So deliver should be now faster and it doesn't anymore remove Dovecot's private mbox headers if you're not using mbox. - Cache file tracks message expunges again - All kinds of other fixes - Some optimizations I think we're getting closer to v1.1 RCs. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: <http://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20071111/ec53728b/attachment-0002.bin>
Timo Sirainen wrote:> http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/beta/dovecot-1.1.beta8.tar.gz > http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/beta/dovecot-1.1.beta8.tar.gz.sig > > Changes since beta7: > > - Added a new "raw" mail storage backend which allows opening > files/streams as single mail mailboxes. deliver uses this now instead of > opening the incoming mail as a mbox. So deliver should be now faster and > it doesn't anymore remove Dovecot's private mbox headers if you're not > using mbox. > - Cache file tracks message expunges again > - All kinds of other fixes > - Some optimizations > > I think we're getting closer to v1.1 RCs. >I just installed beta 8 and everything appears to be running smoothly. Of course, my mail server is pretty basic. Do I need to delete the cache files with the above fix, or is it fine with the old cache files? Jeff
Tere.> I think we're getting closer to v1.1 RCs. > >I'm a little bit confused. Right now I'm using v.1.0.7, but I tried compile v1.1.beta8 with same options as v.1.0.7 and seems it's working fine like stable version does. But if v1.1 is beta then what is/will be v2? And what version should I use? -- Sysadmin
Timo Sirainen wrote:> Changes since beta7: > > - Added a new "raw" mail storage backend which allows opening > files/streams as single mail mailboxes. deliver uses this now instead of > opening the incoming mail as a mbox. So deliver should be now faster and > it doesn't anymore remove Dovecot's private mbox headers if you're not > using mbox. >Does this allow for the potential of a SQL backend? -- Daniel