I am starting to use R for almost any sort of calculation that I need. I am a biologist that works in the states, and there is often a need to convert from standard units to metric units. Is there a package in R for this already? If not I believe that I am going to write some of the most often used in function form. My question is should I include this in my StreamMetabolism package. It is not along the same theme lines, but could loosely fit. The reason that I ask is that I don't want to clutter CRAN with a small package containing some conversion functions because I am to lazy to source them into R every time that I use them, but I also don't want the StreamMetabolism package to turn into StephenMisc Fuctions. Thoughts, comments, or suggestions would be appreciated. -- Stephen Sefick Let's not spend our time and resources thinking about things that are so little or so large that all they really do for us is puff us up and make us feel like gods. We are mammals, and have not exhausted the annoying little problems of being mammals. -K. Mullis
stephen sefick wrote:> I am starting to use R for almost any sort of calculation that I need. > I am a biologist that works in the states, and there is often a need > to convert from standard units to metric units. Is there a package in > R for this already? If not I believe that I am going to write some of > the most often used in function form. My question is should I include > this in my StreamMetabolism package. It is not along the same theme > lines, but could loosely fit. The reason that I ask is that I don't > want to clutter CRAN with a small package containing some conversion > functions because I am to lazy to source them into R every time that I > use them, but I also don't want the StreamMetabolism package to turn > into StephenMisc Fuctions. Thoughts, comments, or suggestions would > be appreciated. > >RSiteSearch turns up the MedUnits package; maybe your conversions are already there, or would fit within that package. Duncan Murdoch
Emmanuel Charpentier
2009-Apr-03 21:37 UTC
[R] [OT ?] rant (was : Re: Conversions From standard to metric units)
Le vendredi 03 avril 2009 ? 14:17 -0400, stephen sefick a ?crit :> I am starting to use R for almost any sort of calculation that I need. > I am a biologist that works in the states, and there is often a need > to convert from standard units to metric units.<rant> US/Imperial units are *not* standard units. The former "metric system" is now called "Syst?me International" (International System) for a reason, which is *not* gallocentrism of a "few" 6e7 frogs, but rather laziness of about 5.6e9 losers who refuse to load their memories with meaningless conversion factors... </rant> Emmanuel Charpentier who has served his time with pounds per cubic feet, furlongs per fortnight, BTU and other figments of British/American sadistic imagination, thank you very much... </rant> # Again, didn't work the first time...> Is there a package in > R for this already? If not I believe that I am going to write some of > the most often used in function form. My question is should I include > this in my StreamMetabolism package. It is not along the same theme > lines, but could loosely fit. The reason that I ask is that I don't > want to clutter CRAN with a small package containing some conversion > functions because I am to lazy to source them into R every time that I > use them, but I also don't want the StreamMetabolism package to turn > into StephenMisc Fuctions. Thoughts, comments, or suggestions would > be appreciated. >
Rolf Turner
2009-Apr-03 22:18 UTC
[R] [OT ?] rant (was : Re: Conversions From standard to metric units)
On 4/04/2009, at 10:37 AM, Emmanuel Charpentier wrote:> Le vendredi 03 avril 2009 ? 14:17 -0400, stephen sefick a ?crit : >> I am starting to use R for almost any sort of calculation that I >> need. >> I am a biologist that works in the states, and there is often a need >> to convert from standard units to metric units. > > <rant> > > US/Imperial units are *not* standard units. The former "metric system" > is now called "Syst?me International" (International System) for a > reason, which is *not* gallocentrism of a "few" 6e7 frogs, but rather > laziness of about 5.6e9 losers who refuse to load their memories with > meaningless conversion factors... > > </rant><snip> Right on, Red Freak!!! cheers, Rolf ###################################################################### Attention: This e-mail message is privileged and confidential. If you are not the intended recipient please delete the message and notify the sender. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author. This e-mail has been scanned and cleared by MailMarshal www.marshalsoftware.com ######################################################################