Hello everyone, I'm a new R user switching from SAS and JMP. In the first few days, I have been trying to do a fairly simple task but yet found no success. I've checked the help archive as well as few R textbooks but didn't seem to find the answer. So, please help me if you can. Basically, I want to calculate the correlation between variable A and B for every subject in my study. (yep, that simple) What I did is this: by(data, id, function (x) cor.test(A,B, data=x)) The results gave me numbers of correlation for each subject. But, the problem is that, all these correlations are the same numbers and the sample size was always the entire database (including all subjects). I've also tried the lm function instead of the cor.test, and the by() function works fine. Can any of you tell me what I did wrong? Or could you tell me what is the best way to apply a function by subjects? Thank you! Best, Che-hsu (Joe) Chang, Sc.D., P.T. [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
Che-hsu (Joe) Chang wrote:> Hello everyone, > > > > I'm a new R user switching from SAS and JMP. In the first few days, I have > been trying to do a fairly simple task but yet found no success. I've > checked the help archive as well as few R textbooks but didn't seem to find > the answer. So, please help me if you can. > > > > Basically, I want to calculate the correlation between variable A and B for > every subject in my study. (yep, that simple) > > What I did is this: > > > > by(data, id, function (x) cor.test(A,B, data=x)) > > > > The results gave me numbers of correlation for each subject. But, the > problem is that, all these correlations are the same numbers and the sample > size was always the entire database (including all subjects). I've also > tried the lm function instead of the cor.test, and the by() function works > fine. Can any of you tell me what I did wrong? Or could you tell me what is > the best way to apply a function by subjects? Thank you! > > > >Only the model formula interface to cor.test uses the data argument, so you need either cor.test(x$A,x$B) or cor.test(~A+B, data=x)> > > Best, > > Che-hsu (Joe) Chang, Sc.D., P.T. > > > > >-- O__ ---- Peter Dalgaard ?ster Farimagsgade 5, Entr.B c/ /'_ --- Dept. of Biostatistics PO Box 2099, 1014 Cph. K (*) \(*) -- University of Copenhagen Denmark Ph: (+45) 35327918 ~~~~~~~~~~ - (p.dalgaard at biostat.ku.dk) FAX: (+45) 35327907
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 7:11 PM, Che-hsu (Joe) Chang <chjchang at gmail.com> wrote:> Basically, I want to calculate the correlation between variable A and B for > every subject in my study. (yep, that simple) > > What I did is this: > by(data, id, function (x) cor.test(A,B, data=x))This recent thread [1] might prove of interest. Liviu [1] http://www.nabble.com/p-value-in-Spearman-rank-order-tt15738907.html
Apparently Analagous Threads
- Wrong result with cor(x, y, method="spearman", use="complete.obs") with NA's???
- bug? in stats::cor for use=complete.obs with NAs
- how to extract object from stats test output (cor.test)?
- cor(..., method="spearman") or cor(..., method="kendall") (PR#6641)
- cor.test in matrices