I have two objects that are associated in the following way:
class Class1 < ApplicationController
has_and_belongs_to_many :class2s
has_and_belongs_to_many :otherClasses
end
class Class2 < ApplicationController
has_and_belongs_to_many :class1s
has_and_bleongs_to_many :otherClasses
end
Now, when I run the following query,
@objects = Class1.find(:all, :conditions => ["class2s.id = ?",
params[:id]], :include => :class2s)
I expect to get a collection of Class1 objects wihere each Class1 object
would have a fully loaded collection of Class2 objects (since I asked to
:include => :class2s). However, instead, I get a collection of Class1
objects that only have a single Class2 object in their class2s
collection (the Class2 object with the id that I specified in the
conditions clause).
I''m thinking this might have something to do with the habtm bug that is
floating around, but am not sure. Am I doing this right? Any ideas?
- Jason
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
Hi Jason, I could be totally missing your point but I think that rails provides you the ability to do this @o = myClass1.class2s @o will now contain an array of all the class2 objects collected in that instance of myClass1 Mark On 1/11/06, Jason Fox <jfoxny@gmail.com> wrote:> I have two objects that are associated in the following way: > > class Class1 < ApplicationController > has_and_belongs_to_many :class2s > has_and_belongs_to_many :otherClasses > end > > class Class2 < ApplicationController > has_and_belongs_to_many :class1s > has_and_bleongs_to_many :otherClasses > end > > Now, when I run the following query, > > @objects = Class1.find(:all, :conditions => ["class2s.id = ?", > params[:id]], :include => :class2s) > > I expect to get a collection of Class1 objects wihere each Class1 object > would have a fully loaded collection of Class2 objects (since I asked to > :include => :class2s). However, instead, I get a collection of Class1 > objects that only have a single Class2 object in their class2s > collection (the Class2 object with the id that I specified in the > conditions clause). > > I''m thinking this might have something to do with the habtm bug that is > floating around, but am not sure. Am I doing this right? Any ideas? > > - Jason > > -- > Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. > _______________________________________________ > Rails mailing list > Rails@lists.rubyonrails.org > http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails >-- -------------------------------------------------------------------- I am Mark Daggett and I approve this message.
What I''m trying to do is find all Class1 objects that have an association to Class2 objects. However, I also want to make sure that the Class1 objects that are returned by the find() method have fully populated Class2 collections, i.e., I want it to depend on lazy loading to get me my Class2 collection in my Class1 objects. M Daggett wrote:> Hi Jason, > I could be totally missing your point but I think that rails provides > you the ability to do this > @o = myClass1.class2s > > @o will now contain an array of all the class2 objects collected in > that instance of myClass1 > > > Mark > > On 1/11/06, Jason Fox <jfoxny@gmail.com> wrote: >> end >> collection (the Class2 object with the id that I specified in the >> Rails mailing list >> Rails@lists.rubyonrails.org >> http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails >> > > > ---- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.