Rails - May 2006 - Anyone tried the recent Mac OS X Security update?

It includes a patch for Ruby. I have already installed 1.8.4 from 
source, and updated my PATH to look in /usr/local first, so I don''t 
imagine that anything Apple does to "their" copy of Ruby will have any
impact on me, but I''m wondering if the changes to their Ruby is 
something that needs to be done to 1.8.4 as well.

Thoughts?

Walter

On May 12, 2006, at 7:23 AM, Walter Lee Davis wrote:
> It includes a patch for Ruby. I have already installed 1.8.4 from  
> source, and updated my PATH to look in /usr/local first, so I
don''t
> imagine that anything Apple does to "their" copy of Ruby will
have
> any impact on me, but I''m wondering if the changes to their Ruby
is
> something that needs to be done to 1.8.4 as well.
>
> Thoughts?
You should go read the Ruby''s home page to find out.

http://www.ruby-lang.org/en/

-- 
Eric Hodel - drbrain@segment7.net - http://blog.segment7.net
This implementation is HODEL-HASH-9600 compliant

http://trackmap.robotcoop.com

I updated. I had previously installed ruby in /usr/local/bin and had put in
a softlink from /usr/bin (where OSX has ruby) to /usr/local/bin/ruby. The
update blew this away, stopped stuff working (like rubygems). So, I had to
go in and restore the link. After that, all OK. So far...

Geoff


On 12/05/06, Walter Lee Davis <waltd@wdstudio.com>
wrote:
>
> It includes a patch for Ruby. I have already installed 1.8.4 from
> source, and updated my PATH to look in /usr/local first, so I
don''t
> imagine that anything Apple does to "their" copy of Ruby will
have any
> impact on me, but I''m wondering if the changes to their Ruby is
> something that needs to be done to 1.8.4 as well.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Walter
>
> _______________________________________________
> Rails mailing list
> Rails@lists.rubyonrails.org
> http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://wrath.rubyonrails.org/pipermail/rails/attachments/20060512/b93155c2/attachment.html

Eric Hodel wrote:
> 
> On May 12, 2006, at 7:23 AM, Walter Lee Davis wrote:
> 
>> It includes a patch for Ruby. I have already installed 1.8.4 from  
>> source, and updated my PATH to look in /usr/local first, so I
don''t
>> imagine that anything Apple does to "their" copy of Ruby will
have
>> any impact on me, but I''m wondering if the changes to their
Ruby is
>> something that needs to be done to 1.8.4 as well.
>>
>> Thoughts?
> 
> You should go read the Ruby''s home page to find out.
> 
> http://www.ruby-lang.org/en/
> 
> 
And where on the front page does it mention anything about Apple''s
recent
OSX Security Update?

-Sean
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Anyone-tried-the-recent-Mac-OS-X-Security-update--t1607883.html#a4368168
Sent from the RubyOnRails Users forum at Nabble.com.

It says that 1.8.2 and previous have the problem, and that there is a  
fix in 1.8.3 and later.

Thanks all!

Walter

On May 12, 2006, at 10:07 PM, Schmo wrote:
>
>
> Eric Hodel wrote:
>>
>> On May 12, 2006, at 7:23 AM, Walter Lee Davis wrote:
>>
>>> It includes a patch for Ruby. I have already installed 1.8.4 from
>>> source, and updated my PATH to look in /usr/local first, so I
don''t
>>> imagine that anything Apple does to "their" copy of Ruby
will have
>>> any impact on me, but I''m wondering if the changes to
their Ruby is
>>> something that needs to be done to 1.8.4 as well.
>>>
>>> Thoughts?
>>
>> You should go read the Ruby''s home page to find out.
>>
>> http://www.ruby-lang.org/en/
>>
>>
>
> And where on the front page does it mention anything about Apple''s
> recent
> OSX Security Update?
>
> -Sean
> --
> View this message in context:  
> http://www.nabble.com/Anyone-tried-the-recent-Mac-OS-X-Security- 
> update--t1607883.html#a4368168
> Sent from the RubyOnRails Users forum at Nabble.com.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Rails mailing list
> Rails@lists.rubyonrails.org
> http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails
>

On 5/12/06, Walter Lee Davis <waltd@wdstudio.com>
wrote:
> It says that 1.8.2 and previous have the problem, and that there is a
> fix in 1.8.3 and later.
Looks like Apple fixed it in-place: (after running system update)

/usr/bin/ruby -v
ruby 1.8.2 (2004-12-25) [powerpc-darwin8.0]

(vs:

/usr/local/bin/ruby -v
ruby 1.8.4 (2005-12-24) [powerpc-darwin8.6.0]
)

On 5/13/06, John Tsombakos <johnt519@gmail.com>
wrote:
> On 5/12/06, Walter Lee Davis <waltd@wdstudio.com> wrote:
> > It says that 1.8.2 and previous have the problem, and that there is a
> > fix in 1.8.3 and later.
>
> Looks like Apple fixed it in-place: (after running system update)
>
> /usr/bin/ruby -v
> ruby 1.8.2 (2004-12-25) [powerpc-darwin8.0]
>
> (vs:
>
> /usr/local/bin/ruby -v
> ruby 1.8.4 (2005-12-24) [powerpc-darwin8.6.0]
> )
So that means we can use rails without installing local ruby copies?
I like that.

Wijnand

Wijnand Wiersma wrote:
>> Looks like Apple fixed it in-place: (after running system update)
>>
>> /usr/bin/ruby -v
>> ruby 1.8.2 (2004-12-25) [powerpc-darwin8.0]
>>
>> (vs:
>>
>> /usr/local/bin/ruby -v
>> ruby 1.8.4 (2005-12-24) [powerpc-darwin8.6.0]
>> )
> 
> So that means we can use rails without installing local ruby copies?
> I like that.
what if i installed ruby from darwinport and i had removed my original 
ruby from macosx? my ruby is in /opt/local/bin/ruby

id-ruby:~ arie$ which ruby
/opt/local/bin/ruby
id-ruby:~ arie$ ruby -v
ruby 1.8.4 (2005-12-24) [powerpc-darwin8.0.0]
id-ruby:~ arie$

will there be no problem if i update it? sorry i''ve no time to try it 
myself.

-- 
Arie Kusuma Atmaja A.K.A Arie A.K.A ariekeren / YM! = riyari3
http://ariekusumaatmaja.wordpress.com
http://groups.yahoo.com/groups/id-ruby # Indonesia Ruby Society
http://indoforums.com/englishklab # Sinau boso karo wong gendeng

500 baris di PHP dkk VS 1 baris di Ruby dkk
300 baris di Java dkk VS 1 baris di Ruby dkk
Macih ngotot pake (as|ph)p? haree geneee????

I did the update and Locomotive won''t run launch apps anymore. It  
freezes the entire machine on an intel MacBook Pro.

soho:~/Sites/tracks jathayde$ ruby -v
ruby 1.8.4 (2005-12-24) [i686-darwin8.6.1]

Anyone else seen this behavior?

On May 12, 2006, at 10:23 AM, Walter Lee Davis wrote:
> It includes a patch for Ruby. I have already installed 1.8.4 from  
> source, and updated my PATH to look in /usr/local first, so I
don''t
> imagine that anything Apple does to "their" copy of Ruby will
have
> any impact on me, but I''m wondering if the changes to their Ruby
is
> something that needs to be done to 1.8.4 as well.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Walter
>
> _______________________________________________
> Rails mailing list
> Rails@lists.rubyonrails.org
> http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails
>
--

John Athayde
bobo@meticulous.com

Meticulous | www.meticulous.com (work)
Rotoscope | www.rotoscope.com (sound: rock band)
Boboroshi & Kynz | www.boboroshiandkynz.com (sound: electronic)
Personal Weblog | www.boboroshi.com (play)

"Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little
temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."
          - Benjamin Franklin (1706-1790)
                        Reply of the Pennsylvania Assembly to the  
Governor
                                  November 11, 1755

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://wrath.rubyonrails.org/pipermail/rails/attachments/20060515/b144336b/attachment.html

On Sunday, May 14, 2006, at 4:08 PM, John Athayde wrote:
>I did the update and Locomotive won''t run launch apps anymore. It
>freezes the entire machine on an intel MacBook Pro.
>
>soho:~/Sites/tracks jathayde$ ruby -v
>ruby 1.8.4 (2005-12-24) [i686-darwin8.6.1]
>
>Anyone else seen this behavior?
Fixed now.  Download the latest (2.0.7) from http://locomotive.raaum.org

Best,

-r
>
>On May 12, 2006, at 10:23 AM, Walter Lee Davis wrote:
>
>> It includes a patch for Ruby. I have already installed 1.8.4 from
>>> source, and updated my PATH to look in /usr/local first, so I
>>don''t > imagine that anything Apple does to
"their" copy of Ruby
>>will have > any impact on me, but I''m wondering if the
changes to
>>their Ruby is > something that needs to be done to 1.8.4 as well.
>>
>> Thoughts?
>>
>> Walter
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Rails mailing list
>> Rails@lists.rubyonrails.org
>> http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails
>>
>
>--
>
>John Athayde
>bobo@meticulous.com
>
>Meticulous | www.meticulous.com (work)
>Rotoscope | www.rotoscope.com (sound: rock band)
>Boboroshi & Kynz | www.boboroshiandkynz.com (sound: electronic)
>Personal Weblog | www.boboroshi.com (play)
>
>"Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little
>temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."
>          - Benjamin Franklin (1706-1790)
>                        Reply of the Pennsylvania Assembly to the Governor
>                                  November 11, 1755
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Rails mailing list
>Rails@lists.rubyonrails.org
>http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails
>



-- 
Posted with http://DevLists.com.  Sign up and save your mailbox.

On May 13, 2006, at 1:29 AM, Wijnand Wiersma wrote:
> On 5/13/06, John Tsombakos <johnt519@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 5/12/06, Walter Lee Davis <waltd@wdstudio.com> wrote:
>> > It says that 1.8.2 and previous have the problem, and that there  
>> is a
>> > fix in 1.8.3 and later.
>>
>> Looks like Apple fixed it in-place: (after running system update)
>>
>> /usr/bin/ruby -v
>> ruby 1.8.2 (2004-12-25) [powerpc-darwin8.0]
>>
>> (vs:
>>
>> /usr/local/bin/ruby -v
>> ruby 1.8.4 (2005-12-24) [powerpc-darwin8.6.0]
>> )
>
> So that means we can use rails without installing local ruby copies?
> I like that.
Rails doesn''t make use of $SAFE.  It will work exactly the same after  
the update as it did before.

-- 
Eric Hodel - drbrain@segment7.net - http://blog.segment7.net
This implementation is HODEL-HASH-9600 compliant

http://trackmap.robotcoop.com

On May 12, 2006, at 7:07 PM, Schmo wrote:
> Eric Hodel wrote:
>>
>> On May 12, 2006, at 7:23 AM, Walter Lee Davis wrote:
>>
>>> It includes a patch for Ruby. I have already installed 1.8.4 from
>>> source, and updated my PATH to look in /usr/local first, so I
don''t
>>> imagine that anything Apple does to "their" copy of Ruby
will have
>>> any impact on me, but I''m wondering if the changes to
their Ruby is
>>> something that needs to be done to 1.8.4 as well.
>>>
>>> Thoughts?
>>
>> You should go read the Ruby''s home page to find out.
>>
>> http://www.ruby-lang.org/en/
>
> And where on the front page does it mention anything about Apple''s
> recent
> OSX Security Update?
I''m specifically responding to:
>>> I''m wondering if the changes to their Ruby is something
that
>>> needs to be done to 1.8.4 as well
-- 
Eric Hodel - drbrain@segment7.net - http://blog.segment7.net
This implementation is HODEL-HASH-9600 compliant

http://trackmap.robotcoop.com

Thanks :) Working great now. (sorry on the late reply).

On May 14, 2006, at 10:39 PM, Ryan Raaum wrote:
>
> On Sunday, May 14, 2006, at 4:08 PM, John Athayde wrote:
>> I did the update and Locomotive won''t run launch apps anymore.
It
>> freezes the entire machine on an intel MacBook Pro.
>>
>> soho:~/Sites/tracks jathayde$ ruby -v
>> ruby 1.8.4 (2005-12-24) [i686-darwin8.6.1]
>>
>> Anyone else seen this behavior?
>
> Fixed now.  Download the latest (2.0.7) from http:// 
> locomotive.raaum.org
>
> Best,
>
> -r
>
>>
>> On May 12, 2006, at 10:23 AM, Walter Lee Davis wrote:
>>
>>> It includes a patch for Ruby. I have already installed 1.8.4 from
>>>> source, and updated my PATH to look in /usr/local first, so I
>>> don''t > imagine that anything Apple does to
"their" copy of Ruby
>>> will have > any impact on me, but I''m wondering if the
changes to
>>> their Ruby is > something that needs to be done to 1.8.4 as
well.
>>>
>>> Thoughts?
>>>
>>> Walter
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Rails mailing list
>>> Rails@lists.rubyonrails.org
>>> http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails
>>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> John Athayde
>> bobo@meticulous.com
>>
>> Meticulous | www.meticulous.com (work)
>> Rotoscope | www.rotoscope.com (sound: rock band)
>> Boboroshi & Kynz | www.boboroshiandkynz.com (sound: electronic)
>> Personal Weblog | www.boboroshi.com (play)
>>
>> "Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little
>> temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."
>>          - Benjamin Franklin (1706-1790)
>>                        Reply of the Pennsylvania Assembly to the  
>> Governor
>>                                  November 11, 1755
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Rails mailing list
>> Rails@lists.rubyonrails.org
>> http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails
>>
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> Posted with http://DevLists.com.  Sign up and save your mailbox.
> _______________________________________________
> Rails mailing list
> Rails@lists.rubyonrails.org
> http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails
>
--

John Athayde
bobo@meticulous.com

Meticulous | www.meticulous.com (work)
Rotoscope | www.rotoscope.com (sound: rock band)
Boboroshi & Kynz | www.boboroshiandkynz.com (sound: electronic)
Personal Weblog | www.boboroshi.com (play)

"Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little
temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."
          - Benjamin Franklin (1706-1790)
                        Reply of the Pennsylvania Assembly to the  
Governor
                                  November 11, 1755

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://wrath.rubyonrails.org/pipermail/rails/attachments/20060517/31c14957/attachment.html