Hi, RH devel kernels from http://people.redhat.com/dzickus/el5/ built against Centos tree are available here: http://fs12.vsb.cz/hrb33/el5/hrb-kernel/stable/x86_64/repodata/ http://fs12.vsb.cz/hrb33/el5/hrb-kernel/stable/i386/repodata/ Regards, David Hrb??
2009/1/3 David Hrb?? <hrbac.conf at seznam.cz>:> Hi, > RH devel kernels from http://people.redhat.com/dzickus/el5/ built > against Centos tree are available here: > http://fs12.vsb.cz/hrb33/el5/hrb-kernel/stable/x86_64/repodata/ > http://fs12.vsb.cz/hrb33/el5/hrb-kernel/stable/i386/repodata/Is this safe to use ? -- http://vnoss.org
Vnpenguin wrote:> Is this safe to use ? >You are not obliged to use them. If you are happy with the CentOS or CentOSplus Kernel then you do not need to install those. There are rare occasions when people have issues, they file against upstream bugzilla and a test kernel is recommended. It goes without saying that the kernels are unsupported by both CentOS and upstream. Regards, Vandaman. ------------------------------------------------------- Your average reporting time for spam is: 5 hours; Great! noob detector -> 3 noobs top posting.
Vandaman wrote:> Vnpenguin wrote: > >> Is this safe to use ? >> > > You are not obliged to use them. If you are happy with > the CentOS or CentOSplus Kernel then you do not need > to install those. There are rare occasions when people > have issues, they file against upstream bugzilla and a > test kernel is recommended. >These are the RHEL-5.3 *Beta* kernels. They are pretty stable, but they are beta releases so you will be performing QA for the upcoming 5.3 release. If they fix an issue for you then feel free to use them if you like, otherwise stick with the official distro kernel(s).
On Sat, 3 Jan 2009, Vandaman wrote:> Vnpenguin wrote: > >> Is this safe to use ? > > You are not obliged to use them. If you are happy with > the CentOS or CentOSplus Kernel then you do not need > to install those. There are rare occasions when people > have issues, they file against upstream bugzilla and a > test kernel is recommended. > > It goes without saying that the kernels are unsupported > by both CentOS and upstream.I would personally recommend to use the upstream kernels from Red Hat instead. My main motivation is that if you need to report a problem, you can do so directly to Red Hat without risking it to be a specific rebuild problem. -- -- dag wieers, dag at centos.org, http://dag.wieers.com/ -- [Any errors in spelling, tact or fact are transmission errors]
David Hrb?? napsal(a):> Hi, > RH devel kernels from http://people.redhat.com/dzickus/el5/ built > against Centos tree are available here: > http://fs12.vsb.cz/hrb33/el5/hrb-kernel/stable/x86_64/repodata/ > http://fs12.vsb.cz/hrb33/el5/hrb-kernel/stable/i386/repodata/ > Regards, > David Hrb??RH devel kernel from http://people.redhat.com/vgoyal/rhel4 and built against Centos tree are available here: http://fs12.vsb.cz/hrb33/el4/hrb-kernel/stable/x86_64/repodata/ http://fs12.vsb.cz/hrb33/el4/hrb-kernel/stable/i386/repodata/ Regards, David Hrb??
David Hrb?? wrote:> RH devel kernel from http://people.redhat.com/vgoyal/rhel4 > and built > against Centos tree are available here: > http://fs12.vsb.cz/hrb33/el4/hrb-kernel/stable/x86_64/repodata/ > http://fs12.vsb.cz/hrb33/el4/hrb-kernel/stable/i386/repodata/ >I would guess what was said by Dag here http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2009-January/070168.html applies here as well? Regards, Vandaman. ------------------------------------------------------- Report another spam? Your average reporting time is: 3 hours; Great! ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- noob detector -> 15 noobs top-posting.
David Hrb?? wrote:> RH devel kernel from http://people.redhat.com/vgoyal/rhel4 and built > against Centos tree are available here: > http://fs12.vsb.cz/hrb33/el4/hrb-kernel/stable/x86_64/repodata/ > http://fs12.vsb.cz/hrb33/el4/hrb-kernel/stable/i386/repodata/ >I dont see the point in building those kernels against the centos base - what are you hoping to achieve with that ? - KB