(Yes, Really .... w/ gcc v4.2.1, like i said in the first place)> Actually, the 1.1 beta v9 builds just fine under Tiger (PPC and > PPC64) if you use the official Apple sanctioned gcc v 4.01 they ship > with both Tiger and Leopard. If you do download and use gcc 4.2.1 from > the GNU folks you might want to pass along the error / bug reports to > them instead of Apple, but I suspect the GNU folks will tell you to > try the current 4.2.2 version or the new 4.3 version.i'm using Apple's gcc 4.2.1: http://www.opensource.apple.com/darwinsource/10.5/gcc_42-5531/ and the v4.2.1 Tiger equiv from the R-project provided at http://r.research.att.com/tools/ both Apple & ATT are _already_ well plugged into both .. er .. Apple & GNU. yes, 4.2.1 is "not distro" ... but it *is* up-n-coming, as evienced by the fact that it *is* offered on the darwinsource page. i'd gather tss would like to know about issues. (it shouldn't be terribly surprising for a projects' beta release to at least be _tried_ with _other_ projects' beta releases ...) cheers.
On Nov 28, 2007, at 1:39 PM, dovecot-request at dovecot.org wrote:> ------------------------------ > > Message: 7 > Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 10:38:19 -0800 > From: snowcrash <schneecrash+dovecot at gmail.com> > Subject: Re: [Dovecot] 1.1beta9 'make' fails on osx/Tiger > To: "Jerry Yeager" <jerry at scene-naturally.dyndns.org> > Cc: dovecot at dovecot.org > Message-ID: > <70f41ba20711281038q12499454o94a9a221e61c54b2 at mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 >(stuff cut out)> > i'd gather tss would like to know about issues. (it shouldn't be > terribly surprising for a projects' beta release to at least be > _tried_ with _other_ projects' beta releases ...) > > cheers. > >That is usually a good idea, especially if you mention that you are using non standard stuff so that folks who are not aware of that can then get a better understanding of the issues. Or for the elucidation of the folks that are following the list trying to decide what efforts they will have to undertake to make the switch. p.s. The folks at AT&T also recommend that "you" use the newer version of gcc than the older-hacked-to-get-something-for-Tiger version of the Apple Leopard version they (AT&T) are providing -- it is further down the page where they provide links. Jerry -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 2447 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20071128/68d2a778/attachment-0002.bin>
> p.s. The folks at AT&T also recommend that "you" use the newer version > of gcc than the older-hacked-to-get-something-for-Tiger version of the > Apple Leopard version they (AT&T) are providing -- it is further down > the page where they provide links.just looked at the page & have no idea what you're referring to ... can you quote? thx.
Seemingly Similar Threads
- 1.1beta9 'make' fails on osx/Tiger, but OK on osx/Leopard (multiple definitions of symbol _hash_create)
- questions about extended attributes support across *nix & osx (hfs+) filesys
- Mini-HOWTO: Fixing rsync on Tiger (Mac OS X 10.4.x)
- dyn.load tcl/tk (PR#1774)
- Apple Mail/Tiger Bug came up on the pf mailing list. . .