Jerry Geis
2007-Jan-31 14:41 UTC
[CentOS] performance lost in using a software raid array with only 1 disk
Is there any performance lost in using a software raid array with only 1 disk? I was wanting to use the mdadm monitoring tools to monitor the machines single disk drive for failures and such. Is there any performance hit for such a setup? Some machines have RAID some machines dont (for me) and I was thinking about a common setup. Also then if I want in the future I can actually just add the second disk and now I have RAID. Jerry
Sudev Barar
2007-Jan-31 14:49 UTC
[CentOS] performance lost in using a software raid array with only 1 disk
On 31/01/07, Jerry Geis <geisj at pagestation.com> wrote:> Is there any performance lost in using a software raid array > with only 1 disk?IMHO a single disk in array should not make it faster or slower. However I would look at this thread with interest for answers from Guru's -- Regards, Sudev Barar
Feizhou
2007-Jan-31 15:09 UTC
[CentOS] performance lost in using a software raid array with only 1 disk
Jerry Geis wrote:> Is there any performance lost in using a software raid array > with only 1 disk? > > I was wanting to use the mdadm monitoring tools to monitor the > machines single disk drive for failures and such. Is there any > performance hit for such a setup?I assume you are talking about RAID1 arrays. No, you won't. Rather, you will get a performance loss if you carve up your disk into more than one partition.> > Some machines have RAID some machines dont (for me) and > I was thinking about a common setup. > > Also then if I want in the future I can actually just add the second > disk and now I have RAID.I don't think you can actually build an array with missing disks.
Dennis Willson
2007-Jan-31 21:56 UTC
[CentOS] performance lost in using a software raid array with only 1 disk
On Wed, 31 Jan 2007 09:41:42 -0500 Jerry Geis <geisj at pagestation.com> wrote:>Is there any performance lost in using a software raid array >with only 1 disk? > >I was wanting to use the mdadm monitoring tools to monitor the >machines single disk drive for failures and such. Is there any >performance hit for such a setup? >For monitor drive health I would think smartd would be a better choice.>Some machines have RAID some machines dont (for me) and >I was thinking about a common setup. > >Also then if I want in the future I can actually just add the second >disk and now I have RAID.This is not a bad idea if you plan on actually upgrading running machines non-RAID machines to RAID 1.> >Jerry >_______________________________________________ >CentOS mailing list >CentOS at centos.org >http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-------------------------------------------------- Dennis Willson