About a month ago I did an upgrade of glibc on one of our test centos5 systems. And yum happily gave me about 8 packages, including both bitted-nesses of glibc-common. This morning I was showing a co-worker how to upgrade glibc. And he found that yum wouldn't give him glibc-common-2.5-123.el5_11.1.i386.rpm. So I browsed to the web interface of one of the centos5 mirrors, and couldn't find it either. Not in the x86_64 tree anyway. Did that package disappear on purpose?
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 10:56:29AM -0700, Ali Corbin wrote:> This morning I was showing a co-worker how to upgrade glibc. And he > found that yum wouldn't give him > glibc-common-2.5-123.el5_11.1.i386.rpm. > > So I browsed to the web interface of one of the centos5 mirrors, and > couldn't find it either. Not in the x86_64 tree anyway.It's in the updates tree for i386: eg http://mirror.centos.org/centos-5/5/updates/i386/RPMS/glibc-common-2.5-123.el5_11.1.i386.rpm There's no i386 version in the x86_64 tree because it doesn't have any librarie, just binaries (eg /usr/bin/getent) and non-architecture files (eg locale, defaults). (Basically, don't install this on a 64bit machine!!) -- rgds Stephen
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 11:25 AM, Stephen Harris <lists at spuddy.org> wrote:> On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 10:56:29AM -0700, Ali Corbin wrote: >> This morning I was showing a co-worker how to upgrade glibc. And he >> found that yum wouldn't give him >> glibc-common-2.5-123.el5_11.1.i386.rpm. >> >> So I browsed to the web interface of one of the centos5 mirrors, and >> couldn't find it either. Not in the x86_64 tree anyway. > > It's in the updates tree for i386: > eg > http://mirror.centos.org/centos-5/5/updates/i386/RPMS/glibc-common-2.5-123.el5_11.1.i386.rpm > > There's no i386 version in the x86_64 tree because it doesn't have any > librarie, just binaries (eg /usr/bin/getent) and non-architecture files > (eg locale, defaults). > > (Basically, don't install this on a 64bit machine!!) > > -- > > rgds > Stephen > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centosI thought I saw bunches of libraries in that rpm. Let me look through my history. ...... Oh, fudge. That was the devel package I was looking at. Never mind.