On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 2:04 PM, Gordon Messmer <gordon.messmer at gmail.com> wrote:> On 03/06/2015 01:41 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: >> >> I just want the package revisions for at least the kernel and tzdata* >> files and anything else where previously-found bugs related to the >> leap second have been fixed. > > > https://access.redhat.com/articles/15145In addition to that article, the following one was updated recently: https://access.redhat.com/articles/199563 ("Are we susceptible to a leap second event?") Akemi
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015, at 18:30, Akemi Yagi wrote:> On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 2:04 PM, Gordon Messmer <gordon.messmer at gmail.com> > wrote: > > On 03/06/2015 01:41 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: > >> > >> I just want the package revisions for at least the kernel and tzdata* > >> files and anything else where previously-found bugs related to the > >> leap second have been fixed. > > > > > > https://access.redhat.com/articles/15145 > > In addition to that article, the following one was updated recently: > > https://access.redhat.com/articles/199563 > ("Are we susceptible to a leap second event?") > > Akemi >This article is pretty thorough on things to consider in regards to computers and leap seconds: http://queue.acm.org/detail.cfm?id=1967009
On 03/19/2015 07:47 PM, Mark Felder wrote: I just used the test script privided by RHEL https://access.redhat.com/labs/leapsecond/leap_vulnerability.sh to test my up2date CentOS 5 and CentOS 6 and all are reported as "Non Vulnerable" !> > On Wed, Mar 18, 2015, at 18:30, Akemi Yagi wrote: >> On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 2:04 PM, Gordon Messmer <gordon.messmer at gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> On 03/06/2015 01:41 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: >>>> I just want the package revisions for at least the kernel and tzdata* >>>> files and anything else where previously-found bugs related to the >>>> leap second have been fixed. >>> >>> https://access.redhat.com/articles/15145 >> In addition to that article, the following one was updated recently: >> >> https://access.redhat.com/articles/199563 >> ("Are we susceptible to a leap second event?") >> >> Akemi >> > This article is pretty thorough on things to consider in regards to > computers and leap seconds: > > http://queue.acm.org/detail.cfm?id=1967009 > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-- (?- Bernard Lheureux Gestionnaire des MailingLists ML, TechML, LinuxML //\ http://www.bbsoft4.org/Mailinglists.htm ** MailTo:root at bbsoft4.org v_/_ http://www.bbsoft4.org/ <<<<<< * >>>>>> http://www.portalinux.org/
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 6:30 PM, Akemi Yagi <amyagi at gmail.com> wrote:> On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 2:04 PM, Gordon Messmer <gordon.messmer at gmail.com> wrote: >> On 03/06/2015 01:41 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: >>> >>> I just want the package revisions for at least the kernel and tzdata* >>> files and anything else where previously-found bugs related to the >>> leap second have been fixed. >> >> >> https://access.redhat.com/articles/15145 > > In addition to that article, the following one was updated recently: > > https://access.redhat.com/articles/199563 > ("Are we susceptible to a leap second event?") >Still way tl;dnr material. Doesn't anyone have a list of the oldest kernel version for each Centos version you could be running and still avoid known problems? -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell at gmail.com
On Tue, 24 Mar 2015 12:56:27 -0500 Les Mikesell wrote:> Doesn't anyone have a list of the oldest > kernel version for each Centos version you could be running and still > avoid known problems?The best answer to your question is "the latest version", since previous versions all have known issues of one kind or another. It's not a great idea to run outdated Centos systems with known bugs of any kind. -- MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Real D 3D Digital Cinema ~ www.melvilletheatre.com