search for: spuddi

Once upon a time, Stephen Harris <lists at spuddy.org> said: > On Sun, Apr 19, 2015 at 09:40:29PM -0400, Tim Dunphy wrote: > > Good tip! But I ran the script with sh +x . I guess that running it with sh > > You should use "bash -x" ("bash" and not "sh" because sh may not be bash > everywhere; eg Ubuntu; "-x" and not "+x"

Steve, Thanks, makes sense. I just don't see why I have to effectively waste an extra IP address to get my connection established. Boris. On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 7:16 PM, Stephen Harris <lists at spuddy.org> wrote: > On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 07:10:57PM -0500, Boris Epstein wrote: > > > This makes two of us. I've done everything as you have described and it > >

On Fri, Mar 15, 2019 at 09:10:26AM +0000, Jochen Bern wrote: > Imagine sysadminning a boatload of VMs getting IPs from a dynamic pool, a la > > $ for ADDR in $CUSTOMER_1_RANGE $CUSTOMER_2_RANGE... ; do > > ping -c 1 -w 2 $ADDR >/dev/null 2>&1 && ssh root@$ADDR do_urgent_fix > > done > > , and it mightn't be that much of a niche anymore ... And

On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 03:15:27PM +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote: > Stephen Harris <lists at spuddy.org> wrote: > > > Bash was bigger than ksh in the non-commercial Unix world because of ksh88 > > licensing problems. Back in 1998 I wanted to teach a ksh scripting > > course to my local LUG, but AT&T (David Korn himsef!) told me I couldn't > > give

Am 22.02.2015 um 16:12 schrieb Stephen Harris <lists at spuddy.org>: >> nothing is using the partition >> $ lsof |grep srv >> <empty> > > Although the prompt is a $, I assume you're actually doing this as root? Yeah - its a bad behaviour doing tasks with a # prompt and then making a request in mailinglists with $ as prompt. Sorry for that. >> $

On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 12:38:06PM -1000, Dave Burns wrote: > What makes you think NIS is involved? > Is Errno 12 a clue? I tried searching for (do_ypcall: clnt_call: rpc: timed "do_ypcall" is a NIS error message. (Previous NIS was called "yellow pages"; the "yp" in do_ypcall is a reference to that). Maybe you have "hosts: files nis" in

On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 12:18:52PM +1100, Damien Miller wrote: > I wouldn't say it's a lot harder to take control of current connections - > writing a ptrace-based tool that hijacked a running ssh client and > injected a one-off implant payload via keystrokes doesn't seem like > much work. * Injection of key strokes into an existing channel may be detected just because

On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 08:54:48AM -0400, Pete Geenhuizen wrote: > Even though Solaris started using ksh as the default user environment, > almost all of the start scrips were either bourne or bash scripts. With > Bash having more functionality the scripts typically used the > environment that suited the requirements best. Bash is a better command shell for many people, but ksh

On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 11:14:07AM +1000, Damien Miller wrote: > ssh server.example.com /usr/bin/do/something > r=$? > if [ $r -eq 0 ] ; then > echo success > elif [ $r -eq 255 ] ; then > echo ssh failed > else > echo command failed > fi ssh remoteserver exit 255 Hmm :-) exit(-1) aka exit(255) is a pretty standard "generic failure code" for many

Hi, I'm searching for "virtualization options". I already take a look on VMware, but it needs too much MS software to work for my needs. Citrix needs less, but the key validation is still MS-AD. Now I'm taking a look at RHEV... and run into Oracle VM! Somebody had already take a look at Oracle VM? We need in primary a solid VM solution for an "enterprise

Tim, where did you installed this nrpe package? is selinux running enforcing mode (getenforce command), try disabling with setenforce 0. why you are running it under xinetd as usual way is to run it as nrped daemon. test against with check_nrpe, not using telnet. -- Eero 2015-05-04 2:27 GMT+03:00 Stephen Harris <lists at spuddy.org>: > On Sun, May 03, 2015 at 07:23:19PM -0400, Tim

Do you need the whole configuration? On the switch end, we have the relevant VLAN (VLAN 48) with the assigned IP address of 192.168.48.101 and the range of ports (Gi1/0/1 - Gi1/0/8) assigned to that VLAN. Seems - and acts - like a legitimate setup and works fine, except for this particular instance. Thanks. Boris. On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 8:54 PM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn < dennisml at

On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 08:32:45AM -0400, Scott Robbins wrote: > Wasn't Solaris, which for awhile at least, was probably the most popular > Unix, using ksh by default? Solaris /bin/sh was a real real dumb version of the bourne shell. Solaris included /bin/ksh as part of the core distribution (ksh88 was a part of the SVr4 specification) and so many scripts were written with #!/bin/ksh at

On Sun, 3 Jul 2016, Stephen Harris wrote: > On Sun, Jul 03, 2016 at 09:19:43PM -0500, Bruce F Bading wrote: > > One, the Google Authenticator (OTP authentication). > > On its own, this is not 2FA. It's single factor ("something you > have"). > > A combination of Google Authenticator _and_ password is 2FA. This is > easy to do with PAM. Agreed >

On Thu, May 04, 2017 at 09:37:59AM +1000, Adam Eijdenberg wrote: > Hi Devin, have you looked at using openssh certificates to help manage [...] > While the feature has been around for a while now (and is really > useful), there doesn't seem to be huge amount of documentation around > it. I found the following useful when getting a client of my running Yeah, when I wrote about it

I know, I know... don't use the non-standard kernels unless you have to... BUT: I have a D-Link N150 USB card. Bus 001 Device 004: ID 0846:9030 NetGear, Inc. WNA1100 Wireless-N 150 [Atheros AR9271] This isn't supported in C5, but it is supported in newer kernels (ath9k_htc). So let's try NDISwrapper: # rpm -i kmod\-ndiswrapper\-1.56\-1.el5.elrepo.i686.rpm

On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 11:23:11AM +0000, Peter Stuge wrote: > I guess that Oracle has patched sshd to call sd_notify() and thus Well, RedHat. > introduced dependency on the systemd libraries for sshd. I don't Yup % ldd /usr/sbin/sshd | grep syst libsystemd.so.0 => /lib64/libsystemd.so.0 (0x00007f0e5b715000) -- rgds Stephen

On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 7:02 PM, Les Mikesell <lesmikesell at gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 5:48 PM, Boris Epstein <borepstein at gmail.com> > wrote: > > Less, > > > > You are 100% right. Of course I brought up my eth0 - but, like you said, > > with no IP. Meanwhile, I brought up eth0.48 with 192.168.48.100. > > > > However,

We have lots of servers with a similar setup (i.e. tagged vlans and no ip on eth0) and this works just fine. What is the actual vlan configuration on your switchport? Regards, Dennis On 24.01.2015 01:34, Boris Epstein wrote: > Steve, > > Thanks, makes sense. > > I just don't see why I have to effectively waste an extra IP address to get > my connection established.

On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 09:12:29AM -0500, Boris Epstein wrote: > OK... but why does it need to be a trunk port? If you are on a trunk port then your machine needs to be configured for VLANs. If you are not on a trunk port then your machine needs to be configured normally. It _sounds_ like you have configured your machine for VLANs but are not on a trunk port. -- rgds Stephen