search for: nesses

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 764 matches for "nesses".

Did you mean: messes
2020 Jul 10
4
[PATCH] virtio_balloon: clear modern features under legacy
Page reporting features were never supported by legacy hypervisors. Supporting them poses a problem: should we use native endian-ness (like current code assumes)? Or little endian-ness like the virtio spec says? Rather than try to figure out, and since results of incorrect endian-ness are dire, let's just block this configuration. Cc: stable at vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Michael S.
2020 Jul 10
4
[PATCH] virtio_balloon: clear modern features under legacy
Page reporting features were never supported by legacy hypervisors. Supporting them poses a problem: should we use native endian-ness (like current code assumes)? Or little endian-ness like the virtio spec says? Rather than try to figure out, and since results of incorrect endian-ness are dire, let's just block this configuration. Cc: stable at vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Michael S.
2020 Jul 12
2
[PATCH] virtio_balloon: clear modern features under legacy
On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 09:13:41AM -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote: > On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 4:31 AM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > > > > Page reporting features were never supported by legacy hypervisors. > > Supporting them poses a problem: should we use native endian-ness (like > > current code assumes)? Or little endian-ness like the virtio spec
2020 Jul 12
2
[PATCH] virtio_balloon: clear modern features under legacy
On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 09:13:41AM -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote: > On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 4:31 AM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > > > > Page reporting features were never supported by legacy hypervisors. > > Supporting them poses a problem: should we use native endian-ness (like > > current code assumes)? Or little endian-ness like the virtio spec
2014 Dec 03
1
[PATCH RFC 1/2] virtio_balloon: convert to virtio 1.0 endian-ness
On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 07:39:30PM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote: > On Tue, 2 Dec 2014 13:44:06 +0200 > "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > > > balloon device is not part of virtio 1.0 spec. Still, it's easy enough > > to make it handle endian-ness exactly as other virtio 1.0 devices: what > > we gain from this, is that there's no
2014 Dec 03
1
[PATCH RFC 1/2] virtio_balloon: convert to virtio 1.0 endian-ness
On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 07:39:30PM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote: > On Tue, 2 Dec 2014 13:44:06 +0200 > "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > > > balloon device is not part of virtio 1.0 spec. Still, it's easy enough > > to make it handle endian-ness exactly as other virtio 1.0 devices: what > > we gain from this, is that there's no
2014 Dec 02
3
[PATCH RFC 1/2] virtio_balloon: convert to virtio 1.0 endian-ness
balloon device is not part of virtio 1.0 spec. Still, it's easy enough to make it handle endian-ness exactly as other virtio 1.0 devices: what we gain from this, is that there's no need to special-case it in virtio core. Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> --- include/uapi/linux/virtio_balloon.h | 5 +++-- drivers/virtio/virtio_balloon.c | 4 ++-- 2 files
2014 Dec 02
3
[PATCH RFC 1/2] virtio_balloon: convert to virtio 1.0 endian-ness
balloon device is not part of virtio 1.0 spec. Still, it's easy enough to make it handle endian-ness exactly as other virtio 1.0 devices: what we gain from this, is that there's no need to special-case it in virtio core. Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> --- include/uapi/linux/virtio_balloon.h | 5 +++-- drivers/virtio/virtio_balloon.c | 4 ++-- 2 files
2003 Oct 09
3
Sasquatch, the Loch Ness Monster, UFOs and...
Mythical Asterisk Creatures, oft-discussed, rarely seen: 1) An "advanced" graphical user interface 2) An IAX2 hardware device 3) A Radius CDR report module 4) A live-method, robust SQL-based dialplan 5) LDAP/SQL/Radius authentication for SIP phones 6) Robust R2 signalling support 7) Multilingual language recordings of all existing * .gsm files 8) Free exchange of PSTN gateways in
2015 Apr 06
2
[LLVMdev] "distinct" metadata nodes are ...?
Aha, okay. I had noticed that the column-info hack went away. So the distinct-ness implies the scope implicit in the inlined call, which later on will be turned into the explicit inlined_subroutine entry. That seems… indirect. I have to say, the LangRef page's words about "merge based on content" is not really to the point. It's like saying the purpose of a street-corner
2014 Dec 02
0
[PATCH RFC 1/2] virtio_balloon: convert to virtio 1.0 endian-ness
On Tue, 2 Dec 2014 13:44:06 +0200 "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > balloon device is not part of virtio 1.0 spec. Still, it's easy enough > to make it handle endian-ness exactly as other virtio 1.0 devices: what > we gain from this, is that there's no need to special-case it in virtio > core. Well, the balloon is weird in a number of ways,
2014 Dec 02
0
[PATCH RFC 1/2] virtio_balloon: convert to virtio 1.0 endian-ness
On Tue, 2 Dec 2014 13:44:06 +0200 "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > balloon device is not part of virtio 1.0 spec. Still, it's easy enough > to make it handle endian-ness exactly as other virtio 1.0 devices: what > we gain from this, is that there's no need to special-case it in virtio > core. Well, the balloon is weird in a number of ways,
2014 Oct 22
0
[PATCH RFC] virtio 1.0 vring endian-ness
On Wed, 22 Oct 2014 01:09:40 +0300 "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > This adds wrappers to switch between native endian-ness > (virtio 0.9) and virtio endian-ness (virtio 1.0). > Add new typedefs as well, so that we can check > statically that we didn't miss any accesses. > All callers simply pass in false (0.9) so no > functional change for
2020 Aug 03
51
[PATCH v2 00/24] virtio: config space endian-ness cleanup
Config space endian-ness is currently a mess: fields are not tagged with the correct endian-ness so it's easy to make mistakes like instanciating config space in native endian-ness. The following patches adding sparse tagging are currently in my tree. Lightly tested. As a follow-up, I plan to add new APIs that handle modern config space in a more efficient way (bypassing the version check).
2015 Apr 06
2
[LLVMdev] "distinct" metadata nodes are ...?
I'm encountering a merge issue whose root cause has to do with "distinct" metadata nodes. I see that distinct-ness is an intentional concept, but the explanation in the LLVM Language Reference is not very enlightening. distinct nodes are useful when nodes shouldn't be merged based on their content. The notion of "merged" metadata is not discussed elsewhere on
2017 Jan 09
6
[cfe-dev] Modernizing LLVM Coding Style Guide and enforcing Clang-tidy
On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 7:25 AM, Piotr Padlewski via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > 2017-01-09 16:15 GMT+01:00 Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org>: > >> On 9 January 2017 at 14:17, Piotr Padlewski via cfe-dev >> <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> > - prefer "using' instead of "typedef" >> > - use
2020 Jul 10
2
[PATCH] vhost/scsi: fix up req type endian-ness
vhost/scsi doesn't handle type conversion correctly for request type when using virtio 1.0 and up for BE, or cross-endian platforms. Fix it up using vhost_32_to_cpu. Cc: stable at vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> --- drivers/vhost/scsi.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/vhost/scsi.c b/drivers/vhost/scsi.c
2020 Jul 10
0
[PATCH] virtio_balloon: clear modern features under legacy
On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 4:31 AM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > > Page reporting features were never supported by legacy hypervisors. > Supporting them poses a problem: should we use native endian-ness (like > current code assumes)? Or little endian-ness like the virtio spec says? > Rather than try to figure out, and since results of > incorrect endian-ness
2020 Jul 15
0
[PATCH RFC don't apply] vdpa_sim: endian-ness for config space
On 2020/7/15 ??9:58, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > VDPA sim stores config space as native endian, but that > is wrong: modern guests expect LE. > I coded up the following to fix it up, but it is wrong too: > vdpasim_create is called before guest features are known. > > So what should we do? New ioctl to specify the interface used? > More ideas? > > Signed-off-by: Michael
2020 Aug 10
0
[PATCH] vdpa/mlx5: fix up endian-ness for mtu
VDPA mlx5 accesses config space as native endian - this is wrong since it's a modern device and actually uses LE. It only supports modern guests so we could punt and just force LE, but let's use the full virtio APIs since people tend to copy/paste code, and this is not data path anyway. Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> --- drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c |