llvm dev - Jul 2012 - [LLVMdev] clang optimizer does not remove unused/uneeded variables(and accesses) from global scope

addition to my last post: 
http://groups.google.com/group/llvm-dev/browse_thread/thread/afd85c3f303ec2a9

i know that using static on my globals will remove them - no other 
compilation unit can then extern the vars

but my question is - in this closed szenario clang is "directly" 
producing the exe - isn't clang aware of that the vars are not in use?

btw: the microsoft compiler still keeps them - even if static, but 
without demangled names :)

On 2012-07-05 12:53, Dennis Luehring wrote:
> addition to my last post: 
>
http://groups.google.com/group/llvm-dev/browse_thread/thread/afd85c3f303ec2a9
> 
> i know that using static on my globals will remove them - no other 
> compilation unit can then extern the vars
> 
> but my question is - in this closed szenario clang is "directly" 
> producing the exe - isn't clang aware of that the vars are not in use?
It can't know that, unless you use link-time optimization.  Which
optimization level did you use?

Hi Dimitry,

On 05/07/12 13:30, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> On 2012-07-05 12:53, Dennis Luehring wrote:
>> addition to my last post:
>>
http://groups.google.com/group/llvm-dev/browse_thread/thread/afd85c3f303ec2a9
>>
>> i know that using static on my globals will remove them - no other
>> compilation unit can then extern the vars
>>
>> but my question is - in this closed szenario clang is
"directly"
>> producing the exe - isn't clang aware of that the vars are not in
use?
>
> It can't know that, unless you use link-time optimization.  Which
> optimization level did you use?
it can know: if you looked at his command line you can see that it is producing
a final executable from the file, not just compiling it to object code.  As far
as I know clang relies on an LLVM aware linker to do the link-time optimization,
though I'm not sure why: in this kind of case it could just do it itself. 
On
linux you can use the gold linker with the LLVM gold plugin, maybe that can be
used on windows too, I wouldn't know.

Ciao, Duncan.