On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 12:26 PM, Sebastian Pop <spop at codeaurora.org> wrote:> For reference, here is how the SPU port is using code and pattern fragments: > > // Holder of code fragments (you'd think this'd already be in > // a td file somewhere... :-)And this comment makes me think, shouldn't this class CodeFrag be included in the same place where PatFrag is declared: ./include/llvm/Target/TargetSelectionDAG.td:544:class PatFrag<dag ops, dag frag, code pred = [{}], such that we get it included through "llvm/Target/Target.td"? I will prepare a patch for this. Sebastian -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc is a member of Code Aurora Forum
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 12:34 PM, Sebastian Pop <spop at codeaurora.org> wrote:> On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 12:26 PM, Sebastian Pop <spop at codeaurora.org> wrote: >> For reference, here is how the SPU port is using code and pattern fragments: >> >> // Holder of code fragments (you'd think this'd already be in >> // a td file somewhere... :-) > > And this comment makes me think, shouldn't this class CodeFrag be > included in the same place where PatFrag is declared: > > ./include/llvm/Target/TargetSelectionDAG.td:544:class PatFrag<dag ops, > dag frag, code pred = [{}], > > such that we get it included through "llvm/Target/Target.td"? > > I will prepare a patch for this. >Please see the attached patch. Ok to commit? Thanks, Sebastian -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc is a member of Code Aurora Forum -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: 0001-move-CodeFrag-from-CellSPU-to-generic-code.patch Type: application/octet-stream Size: 1726 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20120620/6977807a/attachment.obj>
Possible to add a test case? Micah> -----Original Message----- > From: Sebastian Pop [mailto:spop at codeaurora.org] > Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2012 1:40 PM > To: Villmow, Micah > Cc: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu; llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] How to define macros in a tablegen file? > > On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 12:34 PM, Sebastian Pop <spop at codeaurora.org> > wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 12:26 PM, Sebastian Pop <spop at codeaurora.org> > wrote: > >> For reference, here is how the SPU port is using code and pattern > fragments: > >> > >> // Holder of code fragments (you'd think this'd already be in // a > td > >> file somewhere... :-) > > > > And this comment makes me think, shouldn't this class CodeFrag be > > included in the same place where PatFrag is declared: > > > > ./include/llvm/Target/TargetSelectionDAG.td:544:class PatFrag<dag > ops, > > dag frag, code pred = [{}], > > > > such that we get it included through "llvm/Target/Target.td"? > > > > I will prepare a patch for this. > > > > Please see the attached patch. Ok to commit? > > Thanks, > Sebastian > -- > Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc is a member of Code Aurora Forum
Maybe Matching Threads
- [LLVMdev] How to define macros in a tablegen file?
- [LLVMdev] How to define macros in a tablegen file?
- [LLVMdev] How to define macros in a tablegen file?
- [LLVMdev] How to define macros in a tablegen file?
- [LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] How to define macros in a tablegen file?