search for: spop

On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 12:26 PM, Sebastian Pop <spop at codeaurora.org> wrote: > For reference, here is how the SPU port is using code and pattern fragments: > > // Holder of code fragments (you'd think this'd already be in > // a td file somewhere... :-) And this comment makes me think, shouldn't this class CodeFrag be in...

...Q, Carmelo's (Italian), Clay Pit (Indian) Preferences between 6, 6:30 or 7pm as the starting time? -Hal ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Hal Finkel via cfe-dev" <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org<mailto:cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org>> > To: "Sebastian Pop" <spop at codeaurora.org<mailto:spop at codeaurora.org>> > Cc: "LLVM Dev" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org<mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>>, "James H Cownie" <james.h.cownie at intel.com<mailto:james.h.cownie at intel.com>>, "Viet Ngo" > &...

On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 12:34 PM, Sebastian Pop <spop at codeaurora.org> wrote: > On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 12:26 PM, Sebastian Pop <spop at codeaurora.org> wrote: >> For reference, here is how the SPU port is using code and pattern fragments: >> >> // Holder of code fragments (you'd think this'd already be in >&...

Hi, Nadav Rotem wrote: > > On Nov 26, 2012, at 1:46 PM, Sebastian Pop <spop at codeaurora.org> wrote: > > It would be a quick and easy contribution to add a flag to print on stdout the > > loops being vectorized. > > Okay. I am not sure how chris feels about printing to stdout. We should bring it up on the mailing list. Both GCC and ICC have a flag...

Possible to add a test case? Micah > -----Original Message----- > From: Sebastian Pop [mailto:spop at codeaurora.org] > Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2012 1:40 PM > To: Villmow, Micah > Cc: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu; llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] How to define macros in a tablegen file? > > On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 12:34 PM, Sebastian Pop <spop at codeaurora....

...Fri, 21 Feb 2014 17:08:44 -0800 From: llvm.buildmaster at lab.llvm.org To: David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com>, NAKAMURA Takumi <geek4civic at gmail.com>, Rafael Espindola <rafael.espindola at gmail.com>, Richard Smith <richard-llvm at metafoo.co.uk>, Sebastian Pop <spop at codeaurora.org>, Sylvestre Ledru <sylvestre at debian.org>, Ted Kremenek <kremenek at apple.com>, Tobias Grosser <tobias at grosser.es> CC: gkistanova at gmail.com The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder polly-perf-O3-polly-scev-codegen-isl while building llvm....

----- Original Message ----- > From: "Sebastian Pop" <spop at codeaurora.org> > To: "James H Cownie" <james.h.cownie at intel.com> > Cc: "Hal Finkel" <hfinkel at anl.gov>, "John Leidel (jleidel)" <jleidel at micron.com>, "LLVM Dev" > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>, "cfe-dev&quot...

On Mon, 4 Jun 2012 11:41:43 -0500 Sebastian Pop <spop at codeaurora.org> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 11:22 AM, Sebastian Pop <spop at codeaurora.org> > wrote: > >> Why don't you call it with "Promote" instead of > >> "Custom" and let the Legalizer do the job? Does it not work? > > &gt...

> > On Nov 4, 2011, at 3:11 PM, spop at codeaurora.org wrote: > >> I think that for JIT, the compiler should figure out what the host >> is with a *runtime* check (i.e., the JIT should not use the info from >> the configure flag --host.) > > That seems reasonable. Would you update this please? > Yes, I w...

----- Original Message ----- > From: "Sebastian Pop" <spop at codeaurora.org> > To: "Nadav Rotem" <nrotem at apple.com>, llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu, llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu > Sent: Monday, November 26, 2012 5:20:47 PM > Subject: [llvm-commits] Flag to print vectorized loops > > Hi, > > Nadav Rotem wrote: > >...

On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 12:13 PM, Sebastian Pop <spop at codeaurora.org> wrote: > [many things, but I'm only going to focus on one of them] > Would you consider using Polly http://polly.grosser.es to avoid > writing this code? My impression is that Polly (and polyhedral analysis generally) doesn't do want I want. But I'm happy...

...laikie) > 16. lli problem with a simple OpenGL (sara.elshobaky) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2013 14:18:08 -0800 > From: Daniel Dunbar <daniel at zuster.org> > To: Sebastian Pop <spop at codeaurora.org> > Cc: "cfe-dev at cs.uiuc.edu Developers" <cfe-dev at cs.uiuc.edu>, Daniel > Dunbar <daniel_dunbar at apple.com>, LLVM Developers Mailing > List > <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] R...

On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 11:22 AM, Sebastian Pop <spop at codeaurora.org> wrote: >> Why don't you call it with "Promote" instead of >> "Custom" and let the Legalizer do the job? Does it not work? > > I tried this, and the legalizer will happily say that i8 is a legal type > and just return the exact same...

...builders/llvm-gcc-build-x86_64-darwin10-x-mingw32-x-armeabi/builds/273 >> >> Buildbot URL: http://lab.llvm.org:8011/ >> >> Buildslave for this Build: kistanova1 >> >> Build Reason: scheduler >> Build Source Stamp: 143501 >> Blamelist: ddunbar,efriedma,spop >> >> BUILD FAILED: failed run.build.step.test_llvm_1 >> >> sincerely, >> -The Buildbot >> >> >> > >

On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 9:27 PM, Sebastian Pop <spop at codeaurora.org> wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 9:48 AM, Tony Linthicum <tlinth at codeaurora.org> wrote: >> On 7/3/2012 5:01 AM, Duncan Sands wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>>> (4) llc -march=hexagon test.ll -o test.s >>>> >>&...

Hi, On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 11:35 PM, Sebastian Pop <spop at codeaurora.org> wrote: > Hi Ivan, > > On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 5:09 PM, Ivan Llopard <ivanllopard at gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi Sebastian, >> >> On 22/05/2012 23:25, Sebastian Pop wrote: >>> So my question is how do we specify that for most of the operati...

I actually tend to agree with spop, it's cleaner to compute things at runtime than at compile time. One particular reason is wanting to pick the best target CPU for the current arch (which may not be what was compiled for). The current JIT target selection logic is really gross, I do believe that it tried to do this, but it pro...

...ron.com> >> To: "Hal Finkel" <hfinkel at anl.gov> >> Cc: "LLVM Dev" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>, "cfe-dev" <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org>, "openmp-dev" >> <openmp-dev at lists.llvm.org>, "Sebastian Pop" <spop at codeaurora.org>, "Viet Ngo" <ngo at coherentlogix.com> >> Sent: Tuesday, October 20, 2015 12:37:13 PM >> Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] LLVM Social in Austin - Nov. 15? >> >> Hal, I absolutely second the motion. I suggest we take a straw poll >> for: &g...

On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 5:40 PM, Sebastian Pop <spop at codeaurora.org> wrote: > On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 5:06 PM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: >> Sebastian, >> >> First, it might be useful to look at what is done in the PowerPC >> backend. PPC also has condition registers that are larger than the >>...

On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 9:43 AM, Sebastian Pop <spop at codeaurora.org> wrote: > Hi, > > Sebastian Pop wrote: >> Chris Lattner wrote: >> > I'm in favor of it. Of course, the truly awesomest thing would be something like: >> > >> > [cfe-commits] r167788 - [lib/Analysis] Fix bad CFG construction bug...