Akira Hatanaka
2012-Apr-20 21:14 UTC
[LLVMdev] CriticalAntiDepBreaker rewrites a register operand of a call instruction
I am running into a problem when I turn on post-RA scheduler with mode "ANTIDEP_CRITICAL" for mips. I'd appreciate if someone could explain what is going wrong here. This is the basic block before post RA scheduling (at PostRASchedulerList.cpp:322): *(gdb) #3 0x0000000000ed3d26 in runOnMachineFunction (this=0x20aa470, Fn=...) at lib/CodeGen/PostRASchedulerList.cpp:322 322 Scheduler.Observe(MI, CurrentCount); (gdb) p (*MBB).dump()* * BB#218: derived from LLVM BB %if.then1289 Live Ins: %A2 %S0_64 %S1_64 %S2_64 %S4 %S5_64 %T0 %T1 %T2 %T3_64 %T6 %T8 %T9 Predecessors according to CFG: BB#217 ... %V0<def> = ADDu %ZERO, %T9<kill> %T9_64<def> = LD_P8 %T3_64, <ga:@intrapred>[TF=3]; mem:LD8[GOT] ... JALR64 %T9_64<kill>, %A0_64<kill>, %A1<kill>, %A2<kill>, %A3<kill>, %T0<kill>, <regmask>, %SP<imp-def>, %V0<imp-def> ... BNE %V0, %V1, <BB#372> * MI is JALR64 which is a call (jump-and-link-register). T9_64 is the destination register and A0 - A3 and T0 are the argument registers. These registers are not callee-saved. *(gdb) p MI->dump() JALR64 %T9_64<kill>, %A0_64<kill>, %A1<kill>, %A2<kill>, %A3<kill>, %T0<kill>, <regmask>, %SP<imp-def>, %V0<imp-def> * After the region above the JALR64 instruction is scheduled, the basic block looks like this (at PostRASchedulerList.cpp:341): *(gdb) 341 Scheduler.FixupKills(MBB); (gdb) p (*MBB).dump() BB#218: derived from LLVM BB %if.then1289 Live Ins: %A2 %S0_64 %S1_64 %S2_64 %S4 %S5_64 %T0 %T1 %T2 %T3_64 %T6 %T8 %T9 Predecessors according to CFG: BB#217 %S6_64<def> = LD_P8 %T3_64, <ga:@intrapred>[TF=3]; mem:LD8[GOT] %V0<def> = ADDu %ZERO, %T9<kill> ... JALR64 %S6_64<kill>, %A0_64<kill>, %A1<kill>, %A2<kill>, %A3<kill>, %T0<kill>, <regmask>, %SP<imp-def>, %V0<imp-def> ... $110 = void * CriticalAntiDepBreaker has replaced T9_64 with S6_64 to break an anti-dependence edge. This code is incorrect since the first operand of JALR64 has to be T9_64 in PIC mode. After further investigation, I found that the flag for T9_64 of CriticalAntiDepBreaker::KeepRegs that had been set in PrescanInstruction was reset in ScanInstruction, which I think is causing the problem: *CriticalAntiDepBreaker.cpp: 00154 PrescanInstruction(MI); 00155 ScanInstruction(MI, Count); *T9_64 is cleared in CriticalAntiDepBreaker.cpp:264: *Breakpoint 8, llvm::CriticalAntiDepBreaker::ScanInstruction (this=0x262d290, MI=0x22b2168, Count=15) at lib/CodeGen/CriticalAntiDepBreaker.cpp:264 264 KeepRegs.reset(i); (gdb) p i $179 = 145 (gdb) p /x KeepRegs.test(145) $180 = 0x1 * 145 is the value of T9_64. In CriticalAntiDepBreaker.cpp, there is a comment " Also assume all registers used in a call must not be changed (ABI).", but T9_64 is changed here. Also it says "registers that are defed but not used in this instruction are now dead", but I don't see the code that checks whether T9_64 is used. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20120420/a5c3aefd/attachment.html>
Anton Korobeynikov
2012-Apr-21 04:50 UTC
[LLVMdev] CriticalAntiDepBreaker rewrites a register operand of a call instruction
Hi Akira,> I am running into a problem when I turn on post-RA scheduler with mode > "ANTIDEP_CRITICAL" for mips. > I'd appreciate if someone could explain what is going wrong here.All these passes are pretty sensitive to correct register liveness information. As a first step I'd check whether machine verifier reports no errors here. -- With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov Faculty of Mathematics and Mechanics, Saint Petersburg State University
Akira Hatanaka
2012-Apr-25 01:21 UTC
[LLVMdev] CriticalAntiDepBreaker rewrites a register operand of a call instruction
Hi Anton, Thanks for the suggestions. I compiled the .ll file with llc with command line options -verify-dom-info, -verify-regalloc and -verify-loop-info. I didn't see any diagnostic messages. When I add -verify-machineinstrs, it complains that there are instructions after terminator instructions. It seems that these error messages are printed because the verifier does not understand that mips has delay slots, not because it has detected any true violations. $ llc macroblock.llvm.mips64el.ll -mcpu=mips64r2 -O3 -o macroblock.s -mattr=n64 -verify-machineinstrs # After PreEmit passes # Machine code for function start_macroblock: Post SSA BB#0: derived from LLVM BB %entry Live Ins: %A0_64 %T9_64 %RA_64 %S3_64 %S2_64 %S1_64 %S0_64 BEQ %A0<kill>, %ZERO, <BB#2> NOP Successors according to CFG: BB#2 BB#1 # End machine code for function start_macroblock. *** Bad machine code: MBB exits via unconditional fall-through but doesn't have exactly one CFG successor! *** - function: start_macroblock - basic block: entry 0x3ce4700 (BB#0) *** Bad machine code: Non-terminator instruction after the first terminator *** - function: start_macroblock - basic block: entry 0x3ce4700 (BB#0) - instruction: NOP First terminator was: BEQ %A0<kill>, %ZERO, <BB#2> On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 9:50 PM, Anton Korobeynikov <anton at korobeynikov.info> wrote:> Hi Akira, > > > I am running into a problem when I turn on post-RA scheduler with mode > > "ANTIDEP_CRITICAL" for mips. > > I'd appreciate if someone could explain what is going wrong here. > All these passes are pretty sensitive to correct register liveness > information. As a first step I'd check whether machine verifier > reports no errors here. > > -- > With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov > Faculty of Mathematics and Mechanics, Saint Petersburg State University >-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20120424/d9cdf294/attachment.html>
Maybe Matching Threads
- [LLVMdev] CriticalAntiDepBreaker rewrites a register operand of a call instruction
- [LLVMdev] CriticalAntiDepBreaker rewrites a register operand of a call instruction
- [LLVMdev] Question about CriticalAntiDepBreaker.cpp
- [LLVMdev] CriticalAntiDepBreaker rewrites a register operand of a call instruction
- [LLVMdev] CriticalAntiDepBreaker rewrites a register operand of a call instruction