Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-Jun-10 07:07 UTC
[PATCH 0/2] fix kernel crash with macvtap on top of LRO
On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 01:14:20PM -0500, David Miller wrote:> From: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings at solarflare.com> > Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2013 16:20:46 +0000 > > > If the consensus is still that we must preserve packets exactly (aside > > from the usual modifications by IP routers) then LRO should be disabled > > on all devices for which forwarding is enabled. > > I believe this is still undoubtedly the consensus.With virtio we are getting packets from a linux host, so we could thinkably preserve packets exactly even with LRO. I am guessing other hardware could be doing this as well. I am not sure what information would need to be preserved - could someone help clarify please? -- MST
Ben Hutchings
2013-Jun-12 14:56 UTC
[PATCH 0/2] fix kernel crash with macvtap on top of LRO
On Mon, 2013-06-10 at 10:07 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:> On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 01:14:20PM -0500, David Miller wrote: > > From: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings at solarflare.com> > > Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2013 16:20:46 +0000 > > > > > If the consensus is still that we must preserve packets exactly (aside > > > from the usual modifications by IP routers) then LRO should be disabled > > > on all devices for which forwarding is enabled. > > > > I believe this is still undoubtedly the consensus. > > With virtio we are getting packets from a linux host, > so we could thinkably preserve packets exactly > even with LRO. I am guessing other hardware could be > doing this as well. > > I am not sure what information would need to be preserved - > could someone help clarify please?Some LRO implementations may not preserve: - Packet boundaries - TSO/GSO produces packets all the same size, except possibly for the last one. GRO therefore flushes a flow after merging a packet with a different segment size. - IPv4 TTL, IPv6 hop-limit, TCP timestamp - TSO/GSO will put the same values in all packets. GRO flushes a flow if they change. - IPv4 fragment ID - TSO/GSO produces consecutive fragment IDs. GRO flushes a flow if it sees a non-consecutive fragment ID. - MAC header, IPv4 TOS, IPv6 traffic class - Should be the same for all packets in a flow. GRO actually checks and flushes a flow if they change. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings, Staff Engineer, Solarflare Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job. They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.
Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-Jun-12 19:00 UTC
[PATCH 0/2] fix kernel crash with macvtap on top of LRO
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 03:56:36PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:> On Mon, 2013-06-10 at 10:07 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 01:14:20PM -0500, David Miller wrote: > > > From: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings at solarflare.com> > > > Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2013 16:20:46 +0000 > > > > > > > If the consensus is still that we must preserve packets exactly (aside > > > > from the usual modifications by IP routers) then LRO should be disabled > > > > on all devices for which forwarding is enabled. > > > > > > I believe this is still undoubtedly the consensus. > > > > With virtio we are getting packets from a linux host, > > so we could thinkably preserve packets exactly > > even with LRO. I am guessing other hardware could be > > doing this as well. > > > > I am not sure what information would need to be preserved - > > could someone help clarify please? > > Some LRO implementations may not preserve: > > - Packet boundaries > - TSO/GSO produces packets all the same size, except possibly for the > last one. GRO therefore flushes a flow after merging a packet with > a different segment size. > - IPv4 TTL, IPv6 hop-limit, TCP timestamp > - TSO/GSO will put the same values in all packets. GRO flushes a flow > if they change. > - IPv4 fragment ID > - TSO/GSO produces consecutive fragment IDs. GRO flushes a flow > if it sees a non-consecutive fragment ID. > - MAC header, IPv4 TOS, IPv6 traffic class > - Should be the same for all packets in a flow. GRO actually checks > and flushes a flow if they change. > > Ben.Thanks! Okay so since LRO in virtio is actually running on top of GRO/TSO in linux, looks like the only things worth preserving that we don't preserve at the moment are the packet boundaries, for which it's enough to report the first segment size to guest - we have the total length, from that we can calculate the last segment size.> -- > Ben Hutchings, Staff Engineer, Solarflare > Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job. > They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.
Seemingly Similar Threads
- [PATCH 0/2] fix kernel crash with macvtap on top of LRO
- [PATCH 0/2] fix kernel crash with macvtap on top of LRO
- [PATCH 0/2] fix kernel crash with macvtap on top of LRO
- [PATCH 0/2] fix kernel crash with macvtap on top of LRO
- [PATCH 0/2] fix kernel crash with macvtap on top of LRO