search for: thinkabl

Hello, is there a way to configure plugin "autocreate" per domain? Like: For domain xwz.com i want to autocreate folders: Models and Clients For domain yxw.com i want to autocreate folders: Adm and Tech Thanks.

...reserve packets exactly (aside > > from the usual modifications by IP routers) then LRO should be disabled > > on all devices for which forwarding is enabled. > > I believe this is still undoubtedly the consensus. With virtio we are getting packets from a linux host, so we could thinkably preserve packets exactly even with LRO. I am guessing other hardware could be doing this as well. I am not sure what information would need to be preserved - could someone help clarify please? -- MST

...reserve packets exactly (aside > > from the usual modifications by IP routers) then LRO should be disabled > > on all devices for which forwarding is enabled. > > I believe this is still undoubtedly the consensus. With virtio we are getting packets from a linux host, so we could thinkably preserve packets exactly even with LRO. I am guessing other hardware could be doing this as well. I am not sure what information would need to be preserved - could someone help clarify please? -- MST

...fications by IP routers) then LRO should be disabled > > > > on all devices for which forwarding is enabled. > > > > > > I believe this is still undoubtedly the consensus. > > > > With virtio we are getting packets from a linux host, > > so we could thinkably preserve packets exactly > > even with LRO. I am guessing other hardware could be > > doing this as well. > > > > I am not sure what information would need to be preserved - > > could someone help clarify please? > > Some LRO implementations may not preserve:...

...fications by IP routers) then LRO should be disabled > > > > on all devices for which forwarding is enabled. > > > > > > I believe this is still undoubtedly the consensus. > > > > With virtio we are getting packets from a linux host, > > so we could thinkably preserve packets exactly > > even with LRO. I am guessing other hardware could be > > doing this as well. > > > > I am not sure what information would need to be preserved - > > could someone help clarify please? > > Some LRO implementations may not preserve:...

...gt; Where a large amount of data is required (even after compression), > consideration should be given to a separate data-only package which > can be updated only rarely (since older versions of packages are > archived in perpetuity). Q1: Are packages only consisting of a sysdata.rda file thinkable for submission on CRAN ? Are such pkgs the way to go for w.r.t. to the cited policy? If this is the case, how would one document such a package, in particular if we do not export any objects in the NAMESPACE file? In addition, with a sysdata.rda-only pkg, R CMD check issues a warning "Foun...

Hello, Will BDC work if PDC crashes or there is no connectivity between them? I assume that the servers are storing users / passwords in LDAP database; both BDC and PDC have LDAP running locally (changes in PDC are replicated to BDC). Will users be able to log into the domain / use roaming profiles with no PDC (as it crashed or link was broken), when only BDC is running? Tomek

...r permissions and uid/gid*. The NAS supports NFS (which can do what I want) but the NFS-connections breaks all the time. So smbfs/cifs is my available option. * I need to backup the files on a per-file-base (and not in a tar-container) to make the backup-files easily and fast accessible from any thinkable client. * rsync via ssh would be my last option, but ssh has lot of overhead and invokes a key-managment-strategy for automatic backup thnx, peter

Hi, I have a problem with setting up quota usage tracking for domains. Problem is, that domain quota is always based on only one user in domain, the last one on whom behalf any operation was performed. To recreate this situation, one has only to perform: doveadm quota recalc -u USER on a user, and the domain quota takes the value of this user quota. Have anyone a clue what could cause this

On 2017?11?01? 00:36, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 06:27:20PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: >> We always poll tx for socket, this is sub optimal since: >> >> - we only want to be notified when sndbuf is available >> - this will slightly increase the waitqueue traversing time and more >> important, vhost could not benefit from commit >>

On 2017?11?01? 00:36, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 06:27:20PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: >> We always poll tx for socket, this is sub optimal since: >> >> - we only want to be notified when sndbuf is available >> - this will slightly increase the waitqueue traversing time and more >> important, vhost could not benefit from commit >>

...xpress that past the llvm unroller. When the unroller merges iterations, loop parallel no longer depicts the original iterations. So the obvious idea was using noalias scope metadata for this, and llvm.loop.noalias_acccesses would cause the unroller to propagate different scopes for each iteration. Thinkable is also to keep the llvm.loop.parallel_accesses, and the unroller propagates a new type of metadata analog to noalias scope, but loop_parallel scope or something like that. We have methods to achieve this with intrinsics, but I am looking for something more robust that also works with clang. On M...

Anyone has an example of how a working record for agress and rates tables should look? I'been trying all the thinkable patterns, obviously not the right ones, for the last two days. Tkx, LTenorio

...in, handle the file and print sharing. How much of an issue would the missing samba4 (tp3) ACLs functionality and other registry type functions likely be for running such an 'emulated MS' Active Directory domain all under the top-level control of a samba 4 (tp4) AD server? Would this be a thinkable thought to have some of the benefits of an AD domain 'right now', and allowing us to wait for samba4 to be completed and then do it properly as opposed to being forced to introduce MS Servers running AD at the top-level right now, and then likely never getting a chance to switch back to us...

...> > from the usual modifications by IP routers) then LRO should be disabled > > > on all devices for which forwarding is enabled. > > > > I believe this is still undoubtedly the consensus. > > With virtio we are getting packets from a linux host, > so we could thinkably preserve packets exactly > even with LRO. I am guessing other hardware could be > doing this as well. > > I am not sure what information would need to be preserved - > could someone help clarify please? Some LRO implementations may not preserve: - Packet boundaries - TSO/GSO pr...

...then LRO should be disabled >> > > > on all devices for which forwarding is enabled. >> > > >> > > I believe this is still undoubtedly the consensus. >> > >> > With virtio we are getting packets from a linux host, >> > so we could thinkably preserve packets exactly >> > even with LRO. I am guessing other hardware could be >> > doing this as well. >> > >> > I am not sure what information would need to be preserved - >> > could someone help clarify please? >> >> Some LRO implem...

Glück Auf! I know its been discussed more then ones, but as a user I really would like to see the patch for allowing this in the kernel. Some users tested this patch successfully for weeks or months in 2 or 3 kernel versions since then, true? I''d say by creating a snapshot, it''s nothing else in the end. More then one file or tree sharing the same data on disc, or am I wrong?

...t; > } > > > if (err != len) > > I would probably just enable it unconditionally here. Why not? > > > > I thought we only care about the case of tun_sock_write_space() and for the > errors other than -EAGAIN, they have nothing to do with polling. We could thinkably get ENOMEM I guess. If we miss a code things get stuck - It's just easier not to add extra code IMHO. > > > @@ -1145,9 +1148,11 @@ static long vhost_net_set_backend(struct vhost_net *n, unsigned index, int fd) > > > r = vhost_vq_init_access(vq); > > > if (r)...

Hi, After many tries, i''ve decided to give up dynamic websites, which definitely do not match my needs, and instead replace my blog by a webgen site. I''ve however some unanswered questions. 1) RSS One of the main interest of dynamic website is the ability to provide user a view to last updated pages, thanks to RSS. Is there a way for webgen to generate a RSS file from last

Hi guys I was just wondering if there's already a way to automate the process of updating Windows to be specific XP. My idea is to mimic how a Windows server domain controller can rollout critical update on the entire domain. Can Samba do this? Thanks for any info Jan Ardosa --------------------------------- Yahoo! Messenger - Communicate instantly..."Ping" your friends