search for: solarflar

hi guys I wonder if any of you might be using SFN6122F-R7 SFP+ (SFC9000, same firmware everywhere, Centos 7.5 too. I'm trying poor man's setup to get the servers onto 10GbE network. Setup is such that three Dell R815 are connected to each other, each has one Solarflare(SFP ports) and each Solarflare is set as net-team(both ports on a card are net-team device) with runner in broadcast mode. And it all seems to work, they ping each other, iperf okey. The problem, big problem is that when traffic start to flow between all three servers simultaneously, with rsyn...

...> I wonder if any of you might be using SFN6122F-R7 SFP+ (SFC9000, same > firmware everywhere, Centos 7.5 too. > > I'm trying poor man's setup to get the servers onto 10GbE network. > > > Setup is such that three Dell R815 are connected to each other, each has > one Solarflare(SFP ports) and each Solarflare is set as net-team(both ports > on a card are net-team device) with runner in broadcast mode. And it all > seems to work, they ping each other, iperf okey. > > The problem, big problem is that when traffic start to flow between all > three servers simu...

...m getting quite confused with all the different terms different companies use to describe NIC''s virtualization support. Any ideas what the differences are between these brands? I am trying to sort a comparison table but will need some help: Feature Intel ET Series Mellanox ConnectX Solarflare Receive Queues 64 32 ? Transmit Queues 32 ? ? PCI-E Version 2 2 1 Direct IO No No Linux PV Only Mac/Vlan per port ? 128 4096 IOAT and MSI-X Yes Yes Yes Does the Solarflare chip support multi-queue as well as direct IO? Any other features I should be looking at? Than...

...for (i = 0; i < dev->num_rx_queues; i++) > + if (queue == &dev->_rx[i]) > + break; Why write a loop when you can do: i = queue - dev->_rx; Ben. > + BUG_ON(i >= dev->num_rx_queues); > + > + return i; > +} > +#endif -- Ben Hutchings, Staff Engineer, Solarflare Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job. They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.

...for (i = 0; i < dev->num_rx_queues; i++) > + if (queue == &dev->_rx[i]) > + break; Why write a loop when you can do: i = queue - dev->_rx; Ben. > + BUG_ON(i >= dev->num_rx_queues); > + > + return i; > +} > +#endif -- Ben Hutchings, Staff Engineer, Solarflare Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job. They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.

On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 01:14:20PM -0500, David Miller wrote: > From: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings at solarflare.com> > Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2013 16:20:46 +0000 > > > If the consensus is still that we must preserve packets exactly (aside > > from the usual modifications by IP routers) then LRO should be disabled > > on all devices for which forwarding is enabled. > > I believe...

On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 01:14:20PM -0500, David Miller wrote: > From: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings at solarflare.com> > Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2013 16:20:46 +0000 > > > If the consensus is still that we must preserve packets exactly (aside > > from the usual modifications by IP routers) then LRO should be disabled > > on all devices for which forwarding is enabled. > > I believe...

On Thu, 2014-01-16 at 11:07 -0800, Michael Dalton wrote: > On Jan 16, 2014 at 10:57 AM, Ben Hutchings <bhutchings at solarflare.com> wrote: > > Why write a loop when you can do: > > i = queue - dev->_rx; > Good point, the loop approach was done in get_netdev_queue_index -- > I agree your fix is faster and simpler. I'll fix in next patchset. It's simpler but we don't know if it...

On Thu, 2014-01-16 at 11:07 -0800, Michael Dalton wrote: > On Jan 16, 2014 at 10:57 AM, Ben Hutchings <bhutchings at solarflare.com> wrote: > > Why write a loop when you can do: > > i = queue - dev->_rx; > Good point, the loop approach was done in get_netdev_queue_index -- > I agree your fix is faster and simpler. I'll fix in next patchset. It's simpler but we don't know if it...

On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 03:56:36PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Mon, 2013-06-10 at 10:07 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 01:14:20PM -0500, David Miller wrote: > > > From: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings at solarflare.com> > > > Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2013 16:20:46 +0000 > > > > > > > If the consensus is still that we must preserve packets exactly (aside > > > > from the usual modifications by IP routers) then LRO should be disabled > > > > on all devices for...

On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 03:56:36PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Mon, 2013-06-10 at 10:07 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 01:14:20PM -0500, David Miller wrote: > > > From: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings at solarflare.com> > > > Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2013 16:20:46 +0000 > > > > > > > If the consensus is still that we must preserve packets exactly (aside > > > > from the usual modifications by IP routers) then LRO should be disabled > > > > on all devices for...

...writes: > > On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 03:56:36PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > >> On Mon, 2013-06-10 at 10:07 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > >> > On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 01:14:20PM -0500, David Miller wrote: > >> > > From: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings at solarflare.com> > >> > > Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2013 16:20:46 +0000 > >> > > > >> > > > If the consensus is still that we must preserve packets exactly (aside > >> > > > from the usual modifications by IP routers) then LRO should be disabled &gt...

...writes: > > On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 03:56:36PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > >> On Mon, 2013-06-10 at 10:07 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > >> > On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 01:14:20PM -0500, David Miller wrote: > >> > > From: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings at solarflare.com> > >> > > Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2013 16:20:46 +0000 > >> > > > >> > > > If the consensus is still that we must preserve packets exactly (aside > >> > > > from the usual modifications by IP routers) then LRO should be disabled &gt...

On Mon, 2013-06-10 at 10:07 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 01:14:20PM -0500, David Miller wrote: > > From: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings at solarflare.com> > > Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2013 16:20:46 +0000 > > > > > If the consensus is still that we must preserve packets exactly (aside > > > from the usual modifications by IP routers) then LRO should be disabled > > > on all devices for which forwarding is enabl...

...RPS should own this structure. It's just that there are currently no per-RX-queue attributes other than those defined by RPS. By the way, CONFIG_RPS is equivalent to CONFIG_SMP so will likely be enabled already in most places where virtio_net is used. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings, Staff Engineer, Solarflare Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job. They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.

...RPS should own this structure. It's just that there are currently no per-RX-queue attributes other than those defined by RPS. By the way, CONFIG_RPS is equivalent to CONFIG_SMP so will likely be enabled already in most places where virtio_net is used. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings, Staff Engineer, Solarflare Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job. They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.

hi, I want to know some details about this network accelerated modules. 1)what''s the main purpose of this plugin module? 2)any requirement for harware nic? or other hardware platform? 3)I''ve not found the code in Xen3.1 code set. so was it added to xen source code yet? Thanks in advance _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list

I''m having problems starting more than three domains. It sometimes works fine, but more often than not the 4th domain''s root block device times out and so the domU kernel panics as there''s no /dev/root: XENBUS: Timeout connecting to device: device/vbd/2057 (state 6) XENBUS: Timeout connecting to device: device/vif/0 (state 6) XENBUS: Timeout connecting to device:

When vlan device is configured on top of the brige, it does not support any offload capabilities because the bridge device does not initiliaze vlan_fatures. Set vlan_fatures to be equivalent to hw_fatures. Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevic at redhat.com> --- net/bridge/br_device.c | 1 + 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/bridge/br_device.c

...e (Virtual PCI) ---> [ ] PCI Backend Debugging (NEW) < > TPM-device backend driver (NEW) SCSI backend driver (NEW) < > TPM-device backend driver (NEW) SCSI backend driver (NEW) Block-device frontend driver Network-device frontend driver Network-device frontend driver acceleration for Solarflare NICs (NEW) SCSI frontend driver (NEW) <*> User-space granted page access driver (NEW) <*> Framebuffer-device frontend driver (NEW) <*> Keyboard-device frontend driver (NEW) [*] Disable serial port drivers (NEW) <*> Export Xen attributes in sysfs (NEW) (256) Number of guest...