On my Ubuntu 8.04 64 bit desktop, I created an empty Rails project and
from another machine, I used
ab -n 10 http://210.77.27.169:3000/
to test the performance:
==========================================When I put rails 2.3.3 under
vendor/rails:
Server Software: WEBrick/1.3.1
Server Hostname: 210.77.27.169
Server Port: 3000
Document Path: /
Document Length: 7466 bytes
Concurrency Level: 1
Time taken for tests: 193.296685 seconds
Complete requests: 10
Failed requests: 0
Write errors: 0
Total transferred: 76820 bytes
HTML transferred: 74660 bytes
Requests per second: 0.05 [#/sec] (mean)
Time per request: 19329.669 [ms] (mean)
Time per request: 19329.669 [ms] (mean, across all concurrent
requests)
Transfer rate: 0.39 [Kbytes/sec] received
Connection Times (ms)
min mean[+/-sd] median max
Connect: 2 310 948.8 13 3011
Processing: 17357 19018 2103.2 18009 23015
Waiting: 17349 19003 2102.6 17994 22995
Total: 17359 19329 2174.6 18023 23026
Percentage of the requests served within a certain time (ms)
50% 18023
66% 18983
75% 21126
80% 22880
90% 23026
95% 23026
98% 23026
99% 23026
100% 23026 (longest request)
===========================================When I put rails 2.2.2 under
vendor/rails:
Server Software: WEBrick/1.3.1
Server Hostname: 210.77.27.169
Server Port: 3000
Document Path: /
Document Length: 7466 bytes
Concurrency Level: 1
Time taken for tests: 0.212276 seconds
Complete requests: 10
Failed requests: 0
Write errors: 0
Total transferred: 77080 bytes
HTML transferred: 74660 bytes
Requests per second: 47.11 [#/sec] (mean)
Time per request: 21.228 [ms] (mean)
Time per request: 21.228 [ms] (mean, across all concurrent
requests)
Transfer rate: 353.31 [Kbytes/sec] received
Connection Times (ms)
min mean[+/-sd] median max
Connect: 2 3 1.3 3 6
Processing: 12 17 4.1 18 26
Waiting: 5 9 3.0 10 14
Total: 16 20 4.7 22 32
Percentage of the requests served within a certain time (ms)
50% 22
66% 22
75% 22
80% 22
90% 32
95% 32
98% 32
99% 32
100% 32 (longest request)
Frederick Cheung
2009-Sep-03 17:12 UTC
Re: Rails 2.3.3 has a very serious performance problem
On Sep 3, 3:58 pm, Clive <lin....-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:> On my Ubuntu 8.04 64 bit desktop, I created an empty Rails project and > from another machine, I used > ab -n 10http://210.77.27.169:3000/ > to test the performance:That''s interesting, I didn''t get anything like that difference locally. in fact rails 2.3.3 was faster. Fred> ==========================================> When I put rails 2.3.3 under vendor/rails: > Server Software: WEBrick/1.3.1 > Server Hostname: 210.77.27.169 > Server Port: 3000 > > Document Path: / > Document Length: 7466 bytes > > Concurrency Level: 1 > Time taken for tests: 193.296685 seconds > Complete requests: 10 > Failed requests: 0 > Write errors: 0 > Total transferred: 76820 bytes > HTML transferred: 74660 bytes > Requests per second: 0.05 [#/sec] (mean) > Time per request: 19329.669 [ms] (mean) > Time per request: 19329.669 [ms] (mean, across all concurrent > requests) > Transfer rate: 0.39 [Kbytes/sec] received > > Connection Times (ms) > min mean[+/-sd] median max > Connect: 2 310 948.8 13 3011 > Processing: 17357 19018 2103.2 18009 23015 > Waiting: 17349 19003 2102.6 17994 22995 > Total: 17359 19329 2174.6 18023 23026 > > Percentage of the requests served within a certain time (ms) > 50% 18023 > 66% 18983 > 75% 21126 > 80% 22880 > 90% 23026 > 95% 23026 > 98% 23026 > 99% 23026 > 100% 23026 (longest request) > ===========================================> When I put rails 2.2.2 under vendor/rails: > Server Software: WEBrick/1.3.1 > Server Hostname: 210.77.27.169 > Server Port: 3000 > > Document Path: / > Document Length: 7466 bytes > > Concurrency Level: 1 > Time taken for tests: 0.212276 seconds > Complete requests: 10 > Failed requests: 0 > Write errors: 0 > Total transferred: 77080 bytes > HTML transferred: 74660 bytes > Requests per second: 47.11 [#/sec] (mean) > Time per request: 21.228 [ms] (mean) > Time per request: 21.228 [ms] (mean, across all concurrent > requests) > Transfer rate: 353.31 [Kbytes/sec] received > > Connection Times (ms) > min mean[+/-sd] median max > Connect: 2 3 1.3 3 6 > Processing: 12 17 4.1 18 26 > Waiting: 5 9 3.0 10 14 > Total: 16 20 4.7 22 32 > > Percentage of the requests served within a certain time (ms) > 50% 22 > 66% 22 > 75% 22 > 80% 22 > 90% 32 > 95% 32 > 98% 32 > 99% 32 > 100% 32 (longest request)
When you did this "test" did you run the tests multiple times and take the average? Was this something that was reproducible? On Sep 3, 7:58 am, Clive <lin....-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:> On my Ubuntu 8.04 64 bit desktop, I created an empty Rails project and > from another machine, I used > ab -n 10http://210.77.27.169:3000/ > to test the performance: > ==========================================> When I put rails 2.3.3 under vendor/rails: > Server Software: WEBrick/1.3.1 > Server Hostname: 210.77.27.169 > Server Port: 3000 > > Document Path: / > Document Length: 7466 bytes > > Concurrency Level: 1 > Time taken for tests: 193.296685 seconds > Complete requests: 10 > Failed requests: 0 > Write errors: 0 > Total transferred: 76820 bytes > HTML transferred: 74660 bytes > Requests per second: 0.05 [#/sec] (mean) > Time per request: 19329.669 [ms] (mean) > Time per request: 19329.669 [ms] (mean, across all concurrent > requests) > Transfer rate: 0.39 [Kbytes/sec] received > > Connection Times (ms) > min mean[+/-sd] median max > Connect: 2 310 948.8 13 3011 > Processing: 17357 19018 2103.2 18009 23015 > Waiting: 17349 19003 2102.6 17994 22995 > Total: 17359 19329 2174.6 18023 23026 > > Percentage of the requests served within a certain time (ms) > 50% 18023 > 66% 18983 > 75% 21126 > 80% 22880 > 90% 23026 > 95% 23026 > 98% 23026 > 99% 23026 > 100% 23026 (longest request) > ===========================================> When I put rails 2.2.2 under vendor/rails: > Server Software: WEBrick/1.3.1 > Server Hostname: 210.77.27.169 > Server Port: 3000 > > Document Path: / > Document Length: 7466 bytes > > Concurrency Level: 1 > Time taken for tests: 0.212276 seconds > Complete requests: 10 > Failed requests: 0 > Write errors: 0 > Total transferred: 77080 bytes > HTML transferred: 74660 bytes > Requests per second: 47.11 [#/sec] (mean) > Time per request: 21.228 [ms] (mean) > Time per request: 21.228 [ms] (mean, across all concurrent > requests) > Transfer rate: 353.31 [Kbytes/sec] received > > Connection Times (ms) > min mean[+/-sd] median max > Connect: 2 3 1.3 3 6 > Processing: 12 17 4.1 18 26 > Waiting: 5 9 3.0 10 14 > Total: 16 20 4.7 22 32 > > Percentage of the requests served within a certain time (ms) > 50% 22 > 66% 22 > 75% 22 > 80% 22 > 90% 32 > 95% 32 > 98% 32 > 99% 32 > 100% 32 (longest request)
2009/9/3 Clive <lin.zhp-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>:> > On my Ubuntu 8.04 64 bit desktop, I created an empty Rails project and > from another machine, I used > ab -n 10 http://210.77.27.169:3000/ > to test the performance:Were they both running in production mode? Colin
Yes, I ran it several times. Both on a Windows machine of my colleague and my Linux box. In fact, it is my colleague complaining about the low efficiency when testing it locally after I upgrade rails from 2.2.2 to 2.3.3 that drove me to do this test. On Sep 4, 1:48 am, heimdull <fre...-RCI/mp9mI1I6GGFevw1D/A@public.gmane.org> wrote:> When you did this "test" did you run the tests multiple times and take > the average? Was this something that was reproducible? > > On Sep 3, 7:58 am, Clive <lin....-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote: > > > On my Ubuntu 8.04 64 bit desktop, I created an empty Rails project and > > from another machine, I used > > ab -n 10http://210.77.27.169:3000/ > > to test the performance: > > ==========================================> > When I put rails 2.3.3 under vendor/rails: > > Server Software: WEBrick/1.3.1 > > Server Hostname: 210.77.27.169 > > Server Port: 3000 > > > Document Path: / > > Document Length: 7466 bytes > > > Concurrency Level: 1 > > Time taken for tests: 193.296685 seconds > > Complete requests: 10 > > Failed requests: 0 > > Write errors: 0 > > Total transferred: 76820 bytes > > HTML transferred: 74660 bytes > > Requests per second: 0.05 [#/sec] (mean) > > Time per request: 19329.669 [ms] (mean) > > Time per request: 19329.669 [ms] (mean, across all concurrent > > requests) > > Transfer rate: 0.39 [Kbytes/sec] received > > > Connection Times (ms) > > min mean[+/-sd] median max > > Connect: 2 310 948.8 13 3011 > > Processing: 17357 19018 2103.2 18009 23015 > > Waiting: 17349 19003 2102.6 17994 22995 > > Total: 17359 19329 2174.6 18023 23026 > > > Percentage of the requests served within a certain time (ms) > > 50% 18023 > > 66% 18983 > > 75% 21126 > > 80% 22880 > > 90% 23026 > > 95% 23026 > > 98% 23026 > > 99% 23026 > > 100% 23026 (longest request) > > ===========================================> > When I put rails 2.2.2 under vendor/rails: > > Server Software: WEBrick/1.3.1 > > Server Hostname: 210.77.27.169 > > Server Port: 3000 > > > Document Path: / > > Document Length: 7466 bytes > > > Concurrency Level: 1 > > Time taken for tests: 0.212276 seconds > > Complete requests: 10 > > Failed requests: 0 > > Write errors: 0 > > Total transferred: 77080 bytes > > HTML transferred: 74660 bytes > > Requests per second: 47.11 [#/sec] (mean) > > Time per request: 21.228 [ms] (mean) > > Time per request: 21.228 [ms] (mean, across all concurrent > > requests) > > Transfer rate: 353.31 [Kbytes/sec] received > > > Connection Times (ms) > > min mean[+/-sd] median max > > Connect: 2 3 1.3 3 6 > > Processing: 12 17 4.1 18 26 > > Waiting: 5 9 3.0 10 14 > > Total: 16 20 4.7 22 32 > > > Percentage of the requests served within a certain time (ms) > > 50% 22 > > 66% 22 > > 75% 22 > > 80% 22 > > 90% 32 > > 95% 32 > > 98% 32 > > 99% 32 > > 100% 32 (longest request)
No, they all ran in development mode. In our production machines, I did not notice such huge difference in performance. If it is because of the development mode, I wonder: 1. What slows Rails 2.3.3 down in development? 2. How to overcome it? We need to test our app in our development machine, this slows down our development significantly and makes the developers very frustrated when they need to wait for each request. On Sep 4, 3:25 am, Colin Law <clan...-gM/Ye1E23mwN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org> wrote:> 2009/9/3 Clive <lin....-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>: > > > > > On my Ubuntu 8.04 64 bit desktop, I created an empty Rails project and > > from another machine, I used > > ab -n 10http://210.77.27.169:3000/ > > to test the performance: > > Were they both running in production mode? > > Colin
Did you visit your app by localhost or by your IP address? Visiting by localhost is quite fast. On Sep 4, 1:12 am, Frederick Cheung <frederick.che...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:> On Sep 3, 3:58 pm, Clive <lin....-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote: > > > On my Ubuntu 8.04 64 bit desktop, I created an empty Rails project and > > from another machine, I used > > ab -n 10http://210.77.27.169:3000/ > > to test the performance: > > That''s interesting, I didn''t get anything like that difference > locally. in fact rails 2.3.3 was faster. > > Fred > > > ==========================================> > When I put rails 2.3.3 under vendor/rails: > > Server Software: WEBrick/1.3.1 > > Server Hostname: 210.77.27.169 > > Server Port: 3000 > > > Document Path: / > > Document Length: 7466 bytes > > > Concurrency Level: 1 > > Time taken for tests: 193.296685 seconds > > Complete requests: 10 > > Failed requests: 0 > > Write errors: 0 > > Total transferred: 76820 bytes > > HTML transferred: 74660 bytes > > Requests per second: 0.05 [#/sec] (mean) > > Time per request: 19329.669 [ms] (mean) > > Time per request: 19329.669 [ms] (mean, across all concurrent > > requests) > > Transfer rate: 0.39 [Kbytes/sec] received > > > Connection Times (ms) > > min mean[+/-sd] median max > > Connect: 2 310 948.8 13 3011 > > Processing: 17357 19018 2103.2 18009 23015 > > Waiting: 17349 19003 2102.6 17994 22995 > > Total: 17359 19329 2174.6 18023 23026 > > > Percentage of the requests served within a certain time (ms) > > 50% 18023 > > 66% 18983 > > 75% 21126 > > 80% 22880 > > 90% 23026 > > 95% 23026 > > 98% 23026 > > 99% 23026 > > 100% 23026 (longest request) > > ===========================================> > When I put rails 2.2.2 under vendor/rails: > > Server Software: WEBrick/1.3.1 > > Server Hostname: 210.77.27.169 > > Server Port: 3000 > > > Document Path: / > > Document Length: 7466 bytes > > > Concurrency Level: 1 > > Time taken for tests: 0.212276 seconds > > Complete requests: 10 > > Failed requests: 0 > > Write errors: 0 > > Total transferred: 77080 bytes > > HTML transferred: 74660 bytes > > Requests per second: 47.11 [#/sec] (mean) > > Time per request: 21.228 [ms] (mean) > > Time per request: 21.228 [ms] (mean, across all concurrent > > requests) > > Transfer rate: 353.31 [Kbytes/sec] received > > > Connection Times (ms) > > min mean[+/-sd] median max > > Connect: 2 3 1.3 3 6 > > Processing: 12 17 4.1 18 26 > > Waiting: 5 9 3.0 10 14 > > Total: 16 20 4.7 22 32 > > > Percentage of the requests served within a certain time (ms) > > 50% 22 > > 66% 22 > > 75% 22 > > 80% 22 > > 90% 32 > > 95% 32 > > 98% 32 > > 99% 32 > > 100% 32 (longest request)
Frederick Cheung
2009-Sep-04 15:30 UTC
Re: Rails 2.3.3 has a very serious performance problem
On Sep 4, 3:31 pm, Clive <lin....-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:> No, they all ran in development mode. In our production machines, I > did not notice such huge difference in performance. If it is because > of the development mode, I wonder: > 1. What slows Rails 2.3.3 down in development? > 2. How to overcome it? We need to test our app in our development > machine, this slows down our development significantly and makes the > developers very frustrated when they need to wait for each request. >Does your other message implies that the app responds quickly when accessing it from localhost ? (I was. if that is the discriminating factor then it is very curious). Also it was my impression that webrick/mongrel only pass the request to rails if there isn''t a file in public that matches (ie hitting / just returns index.html with basically no rails interaction) Fred> On Sep 4, 3:25 am, Colin Law <clan...-gM/Ye1E23mwN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org> wrote: > > > > > 2009/9/3 Clive <lin....-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>: > > > > On my Ubuntu 8.04 64 bit desktop, I created an empty Rails project and > > > from another machine, I used > > > ab -n 10http://210.77.27.169:3000/ > > > to test the performance: > > > Were they both running in production mode? > > > Colin
Now I create two rails apps one by 2.2.2, the other by 2.3.3, each
created with users scaffolding. Then I access /users/ to touch rails.
Each test is performed several times. Accessing from local machine,
the performance seem to be no much difference; it''s both about 40ms
per request. However, accessing from a remote server, there''s a
dramatic difference:
================Rails 2.3.3===============hoolai@db:~$ ab -n 5
http://210.77.26.176:3000/users/
This is ApacheBench, Version 2.0.40-dev <$Revision: 1.146 $>
apache-2.0
Copyright 1996 Adam Twiss, Zeus Technology Ltd, http://www.zeustech.net/
Copyright 2006 The Apache Software Foundation, http://www.apache.org/
Benchmarking 210.77.26.176 (be patient).....done
Server Software: WEBrick/1.3.1
Server Hostname: 210.77.26.176
Server Port: 3000
Document Path: /users/
Document Length: 1301 bytes
Concurrency Level: 1
Time taken for tests: 50.448329 seconds
Complete requests: 5
Failed requests: 0
Write errors: 0
Total transferred: 9200 bytes
HTML transferred: 6505 bytes
Requests per second: 0.10 [#/sec] (mean)
Time per request: 10089.666 [ms] (mean)
Time per request: 10089.666 [ms] (mean, across all concurrent
requests)
Transfer rate: 0.16 [Kbytes/sec] received
Connection Times (ms)
min mean[+/-sd] median max
Connect: 2 5 4.7 6 12
Processing: 10061 10083 22.3 10080 10121
Waiting: 10060 10082 21.9 10078 10119
Total: 10063 10089 26.3 10085 10133
Percentage of the requests served within a certain time (ms)
50% 10082
66% 10089
75% 10089
80% 10133
90% 10133
95% 10133
98% 10133
99% 10133
100% 10133 (longest request)
=====================Rails 2.2.2===============hoolai@db:~$ ab -n 5
http://210.77.26.176:3000/users/
This is ApacheBench, Version 2.0.40-dev <$Revision: 1.146 $>
apache-2.0
Copyright 1996 Adam Twiss, Zeus Technology Ltd, http://www.zeustech.net/
Copyright 2006 The Apache Software Foundation, http://www.apache.org/
Benchmarking 210.77.26.176 (be patient).....done
Server Software: WEBrick/1.3.1
Server Hostname: 210.77.26.176
Server Port: 3000
Document Path: /users/
Document Length: 1298 bytes
Concurrency Level: 1
Time taken for tests: 0.307687 seconds
Complete requests: 5
Failed requests: 0
Write errors: 0
Total transferred: 9140 bytes
HTML transferred: 6490 bytes
Requests per second: 16.25 [#/sec] (mean)
Time per request: 61.537 [ms] (mean)
Time per request: 61.537 [ms] (mean, across all concurrent
requests)
Transfer rate: 26.00 [Kbytes/sec] received
Connection Times (ms)
min mean[+/-sd] median max
Connect: 2 3 2.2 4 6
Processing: 35 57 46.3 37 140
Waiting: 34 56 46.4 36 139
Total: 37 61 45.9 43 143
Percentage of the requests served within a certain time (ms)
50% 43
66% 43
75% 43
80% 143
90% 143
95% 143
98% 143
99% 143
100% 143 (longest request)
On Sep 4, 11:30 pm, Frederick Cheung
<frederick.che...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
wrote:> On Sep 4, 3:31 pm, Clive
<lin....-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>
> > No, they all ran in development mode. In our production machines, I
> > did not notice such huge difference in performance. If it is because
> > of the development mode, I wonder:
> > 1. What slows Rails 2.3.3 down in development?
> > 2. How to overcome it? We need to test our app in our development
> > machine, this slows down our development significantly and makes the
> > developers very frustrated when they need to wait for each request.
>
> Does your other message implies that the app responds quickly when
> accessing it from localhost ? (I was. if that is the discriminating
> factor then it is very curious). Also it was my impression that
> webrick/mongrel only pass the request to rails if there isn''t a
file
> in public that matches (ie hitting / just returns index.html with
> basically no rails interaction)
>
> Fred
>
> > On Sep 4, 3:25 am, Colin Law
<clan...-gM/Ye1E23mwN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>
> > > 2009/9/3 Clive
<lin....-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>:
>
> > > > On my Ubuntu 8.04 64 bit desktop, I created an empty Rails
project and
> > > > from another machine, I used
> > > > ab -n 10http://210.77.27.169:3000/
> > > > to test the performance:
>
> > > Were they both running in production mode?
>
> > > Colin
When I looked at the console output when Rails 2.3.3 was processing request, it seemed that each request was responded quite fast. I don''t understand why it took so long for the client to receive the response. Is it because of rack? Processing UsersController#index (for 222.35.3.195 at 2009-09-06 09:54:58) [GET] User Load (0.2ms) SELECT * FROM `users` Rendering template within layouts/users Rendering users/index User Columns (1.6ms) SHOW FIELDS FROM `users` Completed in 21ms (View: 7, DB: 2) | 200 OK [http://210.77.26.176/ users/] On Sep 6, 9:52 am, Clive <lin....-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:> Now I create two rails apps one by 2.2.2, the other by 2.3.3, each > created with users scaffolding. Then I access /users/ to touch rails. > Each test is performed several times. Accessing from local machine, > the performance seem to be no much difference; it''s both about 40ms > per request. However, accessing from a remote server, there''s a > dramatic difference: > ================Rails 2.3.3===============> hoolai@db:~$ ab -n 5http://210.77.26.176:3000/users/ > This is ApacheBench, Version 2.0.40-dev <$Revision: 1.146 $> > apache-2.0 > Copyright 1996 Adam Twiss, Zeus Technology Ltd,http://www.zeustech.net/ > Copyright 2006 The Apache Software Foundation,http://www.apache.org/ > > Benchmarking 210.77.26.176 (be patient).....done > > Server Software: WEBrick/1.3.1 > Server Hostname: 210.77.26.176 > Server Port: 3000 > > Document Path: /users/ > Document Length: 1301 bytes > > Concurrency Level: 1 > Time taken for tests: 50.448329 seconds > Complete requests: 5 > Failed requests: 0 > Write errors: 0 > Total transferred: 9200 bytes > HTML transferred: 6505 bytes > Requests per second: 0.10 [#/sec] (mean) > Time per request: 10089.666 [ms] (mean) > Time per request: 10089.666 [ms] (mean, across all concurrent > requests) > Transfer rate: 0.16 [Kbytes/sec] received > > Connection Times (ms) > min mean[+/-sd] median max > Connect: 2 5 4.7 6 12 > Processing: 10061 10083 22.3 10080 10121 > Waiting: 10060 10082 21.9 10078 10119 > Total: 10063 10089 26.3 10085 10133 > > Percentage of the requests served within a certain time (ms) > 50% 10082 > 66% 10089 > 75% 10089 > 80% 10133 > 90% 10133 > 95% 10133 > 98% 10133 > 99% 10133 > 100% 10133 (longest request) > =====================Rails 2.2.2===============> hoolai@db:~$ ab -n 5http://210.77.26.176:3000/users/ > This is ApacheBench, Version 2.0.40-dev <$Revision: 1.146 $> > apache-2.0 > Copyright 1996 Adam Twiss, Zeus Technology Ltd,http://www.zeustech.net/ > Copyright 2006 The Apache Software Foundation,http://www.apache.org/ > > Benchmarking 210.77.26.176 (be patient).....done > > Server Software: WEBrick/1.3.1 > Server Hostname: 210.77.26.176 > Server Port: 3000 > > Document Path: /users/ > Document Length: 1298 bytes > > Concurrency Level: 1 > Time taken for tests: 0.307687 seconds > Complete requests: 5 > Failed requests: 0 > Write errors: 0 > Total transferred: 9140 bytes > HTML transferred: 6490 bytes > Requests per second: 16.25 [#/sec] (mean) > Time per request: 61.537 [ms] (mean) > Time per request: 61.537 [ms] (mean, across all concurrent > requests) > Transfer rate: 26.00 [Kbytes/sec] received > > Connection Times (ms) > min mean[+/-sd] median max > Connect: 2 3 2.2 4 6 > Processing: 35 57 46.3 37 140 > Waiting: 34 56 46.4 36 139 > Total: 37 61 45.9 43 143 > > Percentage of the requests served within a certain time (ms) > 50% 43 > 66% 43 > 75% 43 > 80% 143 > 90% 143 > 95% 143 > 98% 143 > 99% 143 > 100% 143 (longest request) > > On Sep 4, 11:30 pm, Frederick Cheung <frederick.che...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> > wrote: > > > On Sep 4, 3:31 pm, Clive <lin....-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote: > > > > No, they all ran in development mode. In our production machines, I > > > did not notice such huge difference in performance. If it is because > > > of the development mode, I wonder: > > > 1. What slows Rails 2.3.3 down in development? > > > 2. How to overcome it? We need to test our app in our development > > > machine, this slows down our development significantly and makes the > > > developers very frustrated when they need to wait for each request. > > > Does your other message implies that the app responds quickly when > > accessing it from localhost ? (I was. if that is the discriminating > > factor then it is very curious). Also it was my impression that > > webrick/mongrel only pass the request to rails if there isn''t a file > > in public that matches (ie hitting / just returns index.html with > > basically no rails interaction) > > > Fred > > > > On Sep 4, 3:25 am, Colin Law <clan...-gM/Ye1E23mwN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org> wrote: > > > > > 2009/9/3 Clive <lin....-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>: > > > > > > On my Ubuntu 8.04 64 bit desktop, I created an empty Rails project and > > > > > from another machine, I used > > > > > ab -n 10http://210.77.27.169:3000/ > > > > > to test the performance: > > > > > Were they both running in production mode? > > > > > Colin
Reasonably Related Threads
- Why openssh newer than 2.9.9 doesn't send SIGTERM and SIGHUP to child process?
- Domain membership problem in OpenSuse 10.2
- apply with multiple conditions
- ActiveRecord serialize method not returning YAML array in test environment.
- smb access problem through WinXP to samba 2.2.8a-34(SuSE Linux)