Rails - May 2009 - alias_method_chain :process

Hi,

I''m trying to upgrade to rails 2.3.2 and need a little help figuring
something out.

Our app uses the plugin asserts_valid_asset to test the welformedness
of HTML that is generated.

This plugin extends test::unit::testcase by wanting to method chain
the process method.

class Test::Unit::TestCase
  //code snipped out

  alias_method_chain :process, :auto_validate

end

In Rails 2.2.2 this works fine.

However in 2.3.2 this fails saying the method process doesn''t exist.

I can''t find out what changed in rails 2.3.2 that caused this so that
I can go and fix the plugin.

Can anyone point me to what changed... or what I could do to fix the
plugin?  I''m assuming the TestProcess include got moved...
I''m also wondering if this is a loading problem... maybe TestProcess
isn''t included yet by the time the plugin''s init.rb file is
being
called.

Thanks for any thoughts / suggestions that could send me down a path
too look into.
Jay

On May 26, 7:40 pm, Jay
<hooligan...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I''m trying to upgrade to rails 2.3.2 and need a little help
figuring
> something out.
>
> Our app uses the plugin asserts_valid_asset to test the welformedness
> of HTML that is generated.
>
> This plugin extends test::unit::testcase by wanting to method chain
> the process method.
I think that stuff is now only in ActionController::TestCase

Fred
>
> class Test::Unit::TestCase
>   //code snipped out
>
>   alias_method_chain :process, :auto_validate
>
> end
>
> In Rails 2.2.2 this works fine.
>
> However in 2.3.2 this fails saying the method process doesn''t
exist.
>
> I can''t find out what changed in rails 2.3.2 that caused this so
that
> I can go and fix the plugin.
>
> Can anyone point me to what changed... or what I could do to fix the
> plugin?  I''m assuming the TestProcess include got moved...
> I''m also wondering if this is a loading problem... maybe
TestProcess
> isn''t included yet by the time the plugin''s init.rb file
is being
> called.
>
> Thanks for any thoughts / suggestions that could send me down a path
> too look into.
> Jay