Steve Litt
2013-Mar-01 07:57 UTC
[Dovecot] I need help with my mail client: was [OCLUG] running cron on UTC
On Thu, 28 Feb 2013 19:29:20 -0800 Kevin Cernekee <cernekee at gmail.com> wrote:> On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 5:54 PM, Nathan Haines <nhaines at ubuntu.com>I'm sorry to hijack a thread to do this, but I actually had to reply to someone in order to show you the symptom. Before describing the symptom, let me give you the situation... I'm running Claws-Mail 3.8.1 on Xubuntu 12.10. On the way out I just do normal port 465 SSL to my web host's SMTP server. On the way back, fetchmail grabs my messages from my ISP using IMAP (and erasing them on on the ISP's server after retrieval), then delivers them to procmail, which, based on filters, drops them into the correct directories of the Dovecot server running on my desktop. Claws-mail then views all my email on the IMAP server. slitt at mydesk:~$ dovecot -n # 2.1.7: /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf # OS: Linux 3.5.0-25-generic x86_64 Ubuntu 12.10 ext4 At the bottom of this email I'll put a copy of a typical full header on a post from me. Here's the symptom: Every time I reply to an OCLUG post, Claws-Mail loads the *To* with oclug at mailman.oclug.org and the *CC* with oclug at penguin.oclug.org. Unless I remember to delete the CC, this makes me double post every time, and must be quite annoying to you all. This happens *only* on OCLUG posts: None of my other mailing lists display this symptom. It's actually weirder than that, because although when I compose the message the preceding is true, by the time I get the two messages back they both say oclug at penguin.oclug.org. This happens only with the OCLUG list, no others. I studied the full headers of the two messages when they came back to me, and could discern no difference in the two. What I did find, however, is that all OCLUG messages have: List-Post: <mailto:oclug at mailman.oclug.org> Reply-To: Orange County Linux Users Group <oclug at penguin.oclug.org> List-Id: Orange County Linux Users Group <oclug.mailman.oclug.org> Can anyone tell me how to start narrowing down the cause of this behavior? I've CC'ed the Claws-Mail list and the Dovecot list in hopes that maybe they have some ideas. The fact that the rest of you don't post doubles makes me wonder if it's a mail client thing (but of course, only for OCLUG). Thanks, SteveT Steve Litt * http://www.troubleshooters.com/ Troubleshooting Training * Human Performance =====================================================Return-path: <oclug-bounces at penguin.oclug.org> Envelope-to: slitt at troubleshooters.com Delivery-date: Thu, 28 Feb 2013 23:57:27 -0700 Received: from box20.bluehost.com [69.89.18.20] by mydesk with IMAP (fetchmail-6.3.21) for <slitt at localhost> (single-drop); Fri, 01 Mar 2013 02:00:09 -0500 (EST) Received: from athrbthr by box500.bluehost.com with local-bsmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <oclug-bounces at penguin.oclug.org>) id 1UBJuI-0004wp-KM for slitt at troubleshooters.com; Thu, 28 Feb 2013 23:57:27 -0700 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on box500.bluehost.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.9 required=6.0 tests=BAYES_20,DKIM_SIGNED,RDNS_NONE, T_DKIM_INVALID shortcircuit=no autolearn=no version=3.3.1 Received: from [66.51.217.34] (port=57600 helo=mailman.oclug.org) by box500.bluehost.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <oclug-bounces at penguin.oclug.org>) id 1UBJuH-0004vU-Sl for slitt at troubleshooters.com; Thu, 28 Feb 2013 23:57:26 -0700 Received: from penguin.oclug.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mailman.oclug.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r216sAxl005168; Thu, 28 Feb 2013 22:54:25 -0800 X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.2.0 mailman.oclug.org r216sAxl005168 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=oclug.org; s=key1; t=1362120877; i=@oclug.org; bh=pGJLvLZRLVQZMvAPrmj0xY5yD15S7XKt7ZIXrtLn+n8=; h=Date:From:To:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:Mime-Version:Cc: Subject:Reply-To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post: List-Help:List-Subscribe:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=Ikxul7U6431nG0j1/UvXZoPbuId9Olh01KBQFgHtvW4XY4vRSdO0c/3K04k8S52Gz XbPB09lBM+MgYdwfz96Euo5fIKe63jqud0IMfa51HdMC8soz9AwTFLiY/Bf45dQbc/ L7GWPtjXX/RIjqgZmxV19GqgvALnmaDZ+p9aYlSsReceived: from oproxy5-pub.bluehost.com (oproxy5-pub.bluehost.com [67.222.38.55]) by mailman.oclug.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with SMTP id r216rFYG005142 for <oclug at penguin.oclug.org>; Thu, 28 Feb 2013 22:53:26 -0800 X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.2.0 mailman.oclug.org r216rFYG005142 Authentication-Results: mailman.oclug.org; dkim=pass (768-bit key) header.i=@troubleshooters.com header.b=pN/Ec/8K; dkim-adsp=pass Received: (qmail 24695 invoked by uid 0); 1 Mar 2013 06:53:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO box500.bluehost.com) (74.220.219.100) by cpoproxy2.bluehost.com with SMTP; 1 Mar 2013 06:53:12 -0000 Received: from [184.90.206.64] (port=58237 helo=mydesk) by box500.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (SSLv3:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <slitt at troubleshooters.com>) id 1UBJqB-0007gc-KK; Thu, 28 Feb 2013 23:53:11 -0700 Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2013 01:53:07 -0500 From: Steve Litt <slitt at troubleshooters.com> To: oclug at penguin.oclug.org Message-ID: <20130301015307.69d0330f at mydesk> In-Reply-To: <CAEiYjQLRUhbu4MCYoodDBxLYVOoc01dJjA1+dGQywkd7_1w0SQ at mail.gmail.com> References: <CAOF6TY_dmSP+ZS60wKaZo3Lq6iZ+fcqkbh4H46Jz8HOp+xRprQ at mail.gmail.com> <512FB61F.6070607 at truesdail.com> <CAEiYjQLRUhbu4MCYoodDBxLYVOoc01dJjA1+dGQywkd7_1w0SQ at mail.gmail.com> Organization: Troubleshooters.Com X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.1 (GTK+ 2.24.13; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Identified-User: {36493:box500.bluehost.com:athrbthr:a3b3.com} {sentby:smtp auth 184.90.206.64 authed with junk at a3b3.com} Cc: Orange County Linux Users Group <oclug at penguin.oclug.org> Subject: Re: [OCLUG] Clonezilla vs Ubuntu backup? X-BeenThere: oclug at mailman.oclug.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list Reply-To: Orange County Linux Users Group <oclug at penguin.oclug.org> List-Id: Orange County Linux Users Group <oclug.mailman.oclug.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://mailman.oclug.org/mailman/listinfo/oclug>, <mailto:oclug-request at mailman.oclug.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://mailman.oclug.org/mailman/private/oclug> List-Post: <mailto:oclug at mailman.oclug.org> List-Help: <mailto:oclug-request at mailman.oclug.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://mailman.oclug.org/mailman/listinfo/oclug>, <mailto:oclug-request at mailman.oclug.org?subject=subscribe> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: oclug-bounces at penguin.oclug.org X-Identified-User: {36493:box500.bluehost.com:athrbthr:a3b3.com} {sentby:spamassassin for local delivery to identified user} ======================================================
Steffen Kaiser
2013-Mar-01 08:49 UTC
[Dovecot] I need help with my mail client: was [OCLUG] running cron on UTC
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, 1 Mar 2013, Steve Litt wrote:> Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2013 02:57:10 -0500 > From: Steve Litt <slitt at troubleshooters.com> > Reply-To: Dovecot Mailing List <dovecot at dovecot.org> > To: oclug at penguin.oclug.org > Cc: Orange County Linux Users Group <oclug at penguin.oclug.org>, > dovecot at dovecot.org, users at lists.claws-mail.org> I'm sorry to hijack a thread to do this, but I actually had to reply to > someone in order to show you the symptom.It's no Dovecot problem, unless the LDA/LMTP process mangles the headers, which probably is no Dovecot problem as well :-)> List-Post: <mailto:oclug at mailman.oclug.org> > Reply-To: Orange County Linux Users Group <oclug at penguin.oclug.org> > List-Id: Orange County Linux Users Group <oclug.mailman.oclug.org> > > Can anyone tell me how to start narrowing down the cause of this > behavior? > > I've CC'ed the Claws-Mail list and the Dovecot list in hopes that maybe> =====================================================> Return-path: <oclug-bounces at penguin.oclug.org> > From: Steve Litt <slitt at troubleshooters.com> > To: oclug at penguin.oclug.org > Cc: Orange County Linux Users Group <oclug at penguin.oclug.org> > Reply-To: Orange County Linux Users Group <oclug at penguin.oclug.org> > List-Id: Orange County Linux Users Group <oclug.mailman.oclug.org> > List-Post: <mailto:oclug at mailman.oclug.org>Please check your ClawsMail setup if: a) it adds List-Post to the recipient list, b) you have configured any reply action, that adds another recipient to the message, e.g. overriding "To" with "oclug at mailman.oclug.org". - -- Steffen Kaiser -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iQEVAwUBUTBrhF3r2wJMiz2NAQJEcAf9GmUAB+gNIQZcHQKnYwoWfnfzFTNHKNUV isess11QtZ2PQ5duZcBPlBhEdEoMRVl1fk1omw/zHVV1hp1kZz36/MrLIADqrS8i i2hZpXy3rhiPHh24HqWvTfdxthknbwhtAtcEuUc/fpJavRZh07wuIA8bhPon2EKu myKeacNhSwr5Pr+nEMGXsz7CoKG0FyvzrQ6D2z+4LFZXr7EADjdL05Bh0DWk6jN6 Ki+n2LEjW3cPfqnylyYOvF7CyvX/iqrxAVpL43sO0CAYMz7MW/t4qkDntqynkIND qUDMNlW3KCYRYRlniAeBJ9L0FH+IgY8hXoX0hZu/BHMv20YS/BAinw==ZTlj -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Steve Litt
2013-Mar-02 03:25 UTC
[Dovecot] [Users] I need help with my mail client [Was: running cron on UTC]
On Fri, 1 Mar 2013 07:02:54 -0500 Jerry <jerry at seibercom.net> wrote:> On Fri, 1 Mar 2013 00:34:33 -0800 > Ian Zimmerman articulated: > > > On Fri, 1 Mar 2013 02:57:10 -0500 > > Steve Litt <slitt at troubleshooters.com> wrote: > > > > Steve> Can anyone tell me how to start narrowing down the cause of > > Steve> this behavior? > > > > You could begin by telling the (ocluc) list admins to _stop munging_ > > the damn Reply-To headers. That is broken behavior, as nicely > > explained here (among many other places): > > > > http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html > > Interestingly enough, there is also an opposite opinion on the matter: > <http://marc.merlins.org/netrants/reply-to-useful.html> > > Personally, I believe ALL list replies should go directly to the list > and not to an individual unless the individual has specifically > requested such action. However, I am aware that there are those who > disagree with that philosophy.Thanks Ian and Jerry, It's doubtful that the OCLUG's defaulting replies to "list" (characterized by some as "munging") is the root cause here, because probably 90% of the mailing lists I'm on default replies to the list, and this symptom happens only with OCLUG's list. Whatever it is, it doesn't happen when I use Thunderbird instead of Claws. Of course it also doesn't happen on Claws on all the rest of the mailing lists I participate in. The fact that replying from Thunderbird eliminates the symptom, even if I later look at my IMAP using Claws, says to me that the root cause isn't in my Dovecot IMAP server. Paul from the Claws list pointed out that OCLUG emails' List-Post (oclug at mailman.oclug.org) and Reply-To (oclug at penguin.oclug.org) don't match. So far, that's the only thing about OCLUG I've found that's remotely different from everyone else. I have no idea whether this mismatch was intended, or whether it came about through an accident of history. I also don't know how hard it would be to get them to match. Steffen from the Claws list asked whether I configured Claws-Mail to add List-Post to the recipient list, and whether I've configured any reply action, that adds another recipient to the message. The answer to the second question is "no", my OCLUG folder has no properties or processing, my .procmailrc has no filters that change mail from OCLUG. As far as Steffen's second question, I don't know where in Claws' config options this would be configured, but the following command indicates to me that it's unlikely: slitt at mydesk:~/.claws-mail$ grep -irl "list-post" * | grep -v imapcache tmp/tmpfile.00000055 slitt at mydesk:~/.claws-mail$ Another point of information is that this symptom occurs whether I "reply to list" or just "reply". Since I'm happy with both Claws-Mail and OCLUG, I'll "solve" the problem by trying to remember to delete the CC automatically inserted by each Claws reply to OCLUG mail. I might also look into installing OCLUG folder specific processing or properties, or maybe even setting a procmail filter to change the headers on mail from OCLUG. It would basically be a short filter invoking an awk command. However it gets solved, I'll let you all know about it. Thanks, SteveT Steve Litt * http://www.troubleshooters.com/ Troubleshooting Training * Human Performance