mort459
2012-Jun-25 20:40 UTC
[R] Fitting binomial data to a probit distribution without an equation
Hey everyone, I've been reading an old scientific paper (well, not that old, about 15 years) and I want to verify the authors' statistical results. The paper is fairly unclear about what exactly they did, and none of the relatively simple commands I'm familiar with are producing results similar to theirs. The data is dose-response, recorded as binomial data: structure(list(X1 = c(10, 10, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 18, 20, 20, 23, 23, 25, 30, 45, 46, 46, 48, 50, 52), X2 = c(0, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1)), .Names = c("X1", "X2"), row.names = c(NA, 20L), class = "data.frame") The quote(s) from the paper is as follows: "Maximum likelihood was applied to probit models (normal, lognormal, weibull, logistic, and log-logistic) and the data to determine the incidence relationships. The lognormal and loglogistic models best represent the data." and later: "Binary data are utilized for the maximum likelihood dose response calculations" I tried using a simple glm() with a probit linker, but that produced border-line nonsense results. This made sense when I thought about it more, as R was trying to fit a regression line to raw binary data as opposed to binned/high repetition binary data. I've also messed around with maximum likelihood but they're not clear about what equation they're using. In the end, I guess what I'm trying to do is: figure out how they're estimating their probit parameters from a binary data set. To me, estimating parameters seems very different from doing a GLM. Is this even possible to do? Is there a package out there than performs this function or is it in the basic functionality of R and I'm just being dumb?? -Mort (apologies if this is too much theoretical statistics and not enough 'R') -- View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/Fitting-binomial-data-to-a-probit-distribution-without-an-equation-tp4634466.html Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Apparently Analagous Threads
- DistribuciĆ³n log-logistica
- Strange behavior when trying to piggyback off of "fitdistr"
- parametric proportional hazard regression
- multivariate ordinal probit regression vglm()
- multivariate ordered probit regression---use standard bivariate normal distribution?