Leandro Tracchia
2010-Jul-07 16:48 UTC
[Samba] Problem After Upgrade - NT_STATUS_FILE_IS_A_DIRECTORY
I'm running Samba 3.4.7 on Ubuntu 10.04. This is a recent upgrade and we've starting experience a sporadic problem after this upgrade. When users are browsing through Windows Explorer they sometimes run across folders that appear as unassociated files. This requires the user to click the 'Refresh' button in Windows Explorer to properly see the folders. The files and folders are hosted on our Ubuntu server and shared with Samba and accessed on the Windows clients through various mapped network drives. The files on the Ubuntu server shared through Samba are actually MOUNTED onto the Ubuntu server from a Windows XP "server" that is hosting the files locally. These mounted files and folders are what is giving the users trouble in seeing folders correctly. We have other files hosted locally on the Ubuntu server and shared through Samba, but these are NOT giving us problems when browsing them through Windows Explorer. The only files that are giving us this problem are the mounted files. I've noticed that every time I come across a list of folders in Windows Explorers that look like unassociated files, I get the following error messages in /var/log/samba/log.smbd : --- error packet at smbd/nttrans.c(563) cmd=162 (SMBntcreateX) NT_STATUS_OBJECT_PATH_NOT_FOUND [2010/07/06 15:56:24, 3] smbd/process.c:1459(process_smb) [2010/07/06 15:56:24, 3] smbd/error.c:60(error_packet_set) error packet at smbd/nttrans.c(563) cmd=162 (SMBntcreateX) NT_STATUS_FILE_IS_A_DIRECTORY --- The mounting of the files is done through /etc/fstab with CIFS as the mount type. The only solution I can think of would be to move the mounted files to the Ubuntu server so they are hosted locally. Like I said, we are already doing this with some directories, and we are not experiencing a problem browsing through those. If anyone has any ideas I would be glad to know. Thanks.
tms3 at tms3.com
2010-Jul-07 17:01 UTC
[Samba] Problem After Upgrade - NT_STATUS_FILE_IS_A_DIRECTORY
> > > I'm running Samba 3.4.7 on Ubuntu 10.04. This is a recent upgrade and > we've starting experience a sporadic problem after this upgrade. > > When users are browsing through Windows Explorer they sometimes run > across folders that appear as unassociated files. This requires the > user to click the 'Refresh' button in Windows Explorer to properly see > the folders. The files and folders are hosted on our Ubuntu server and > shared with Samba and accessed on the Windows clients through various > mapped network drives. > > The files on the Ubuntu server shared through Samba are actually > MOUNTED onto the Ubuntu server from a Windows XP "server" that is > hosting the files locally.This is truly a bad idea. That XP share should be mounted by the workstations just like the server shares. Move the data to the server, or use the XP box as a server to directly serve those who need the data on it. Cheers, TMS III> These mounted files and folders are what is giving the users trouble > in seeing folders correctly. We have other files hosted locally on the > Ubuntu server and shared through Samba, but these are NOT giving us > problems when browsing them through Windows Explorer. The only files > that are giving us this problem are the mounted files. > > I've noticed that every time I come across a list of folders in > Windows Explorers that look like unassociated files, I get the > following error messages in /var/log/samba/log.smbd : > > --- > > error packet at smbd/nttrans.c(563) cmd=162 (SMBntcreateX) > NT_STATUS_OBJECT_PATH_NOT_FOUND > [2010/07/06 15:56:24, 3] smbd/process.c:1459(process_smb) > > [2010/07/06 15:56:24, 3] smbd/error.c:60(error_packet_set) > error packet at smbd/nttrans.c(563) cmd=162 (SMBntcreateX) > NT_STATUS_FILE_IS_A_DIRECTORY > > --- > > The mounting of the files is done through /etc/fstab with CIFS as the > mount type. > > The only solution I can think of would be to move the mounted files to > the Ubuntu server so they are hosted locally. Like I said, we are > already doing this with some directories, and we are not experiencing > a problem browsing through those. > > If anyone has any ideas I would be glad to know. Thanks. > -- > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the > instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Jeremy Allison
2010-Jul-07 19:56 UTC
[Samba] Problem After Upgrade - NT_STATUS_FILE_IS_A_DIRECTORY
On Wed, Jul 07, 2010 at 12:48:35PM -0400, Leandro Tracchia wrote:> I'm running Samba 3.4.7 on Ubuntu 10.04. This is a recent upgrade and we've starting experience a sporadic problem after this upgrade. > > When users are browsing through Windows Explorer they sometimes run across folders that appear as unassociated files. This requires the user to click the 'Refresh' button in Windows Explorer to properly see the folders. The files and folders are hosted on our Ubuntu server and shared with Samba and accessed on the Windows clients through various mapped network drives. > > The files on the Ubuntu server shared through Samba are actually MOUNTED onto the Ubuntu server from a Windows XP "server" that is hosting the files locally. These mounted files and folders are what is giving the users trouble in seeing folders correctly. We have other files hosted locally on the Ubuntu server and shared through Samba, but these are NOT giving us problems when browsing them through Windows Explorer. The only files that are giving us this problem are the mounted files. > > I've noticed that every time I come across a list of folders in Windows Explorers that look like unassociated files, I get the following error messages in /var/log/samba/log.smbd : > > --- > > error packet at smbd/nttrans.c(563) cmd=162 (SMBntcreateX) NT_STATUS_OBJECT_PATH_NOT_FOUND > [2010/07/06 15:56:24, 3] smbd/process.c:1459(process_smb) > > [2010/07/06 15:56:24, 3] smbd/error.c:60(error_packet_set) > error packet at smbd/nttrans.c(563) cmd=162 (SMBntcreateX) NT_STATUS_FILE_IS_A_DIRECTORYDebug level 10 logs are needed at this point to see what the smbd is seeing when looking at the CIFS mounted files.> The mounting of the files is done through /etc/fstab with CIFS as the mount type. > > The only solution I can think of would be to move the mounted files to the Ubuntu server so they are hosted locally. Like I said, we are already doing this with some directories, and we are not experiencing a problem browsing through those.That would help ! Jeremy.
John Drescher
2010-Jul-07 21:57 UTC
[Samba] Problem After Upgrade - NT_STATUS_FILE_IS_A_DIRECTORY
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 5:49 PM, Michael Wood <esiotrot at gmail.com> wrote:> On 7 July 2010 19:19, Leandro Tracchia > <itmanager at alexanderconsultants.net> wrote: > [...] >> The problem with simply moving the files over to the Ubuntu server is that >> the files on the XP box are stored on a RAID array that comes with a >> controller card whose driver is really only designed to be run on Windows, >> not Linux. > [...] > > By the way, there does seem to be a Linux driver for this card: > > https://ata.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Hardware,_driver_status#Silicon_Image_3124 > https://ata.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Sata_sil24 >I believe that is a fakeraid card so you may need a special kernel (zen sources) that has the dmraid 5 patch. John
tms3 at tms3.com
2010-Jul-07 23:49 UTC
[Samba] Problem After Upgrade - NT_STATUS_FILE_IS_A_DIRECTORY
> > SNIP >> >> >>> >>> This is truly a bad idea. That XP share should be >>> mounted by the workstations just like the server >>> shares. Move the data to the server, or use the XP box >>> as a server to directly serve those who need the data >>> on it. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> >>> TMS III >>> >> >> Why is this a bad idea? We've been running this setup >> for a few years now and its been working fine until we >> upgraded. The XP box only allows 10 user limit for >> shares, so that's why we mounted it to the Ubuntu >> server and shared it with Samba instead of having to >> pay for Windows Server license. >> >> The problem with simply moving the files over to the >> Ubuntu server is that the files on the XP box are >> stored on a RAID array that comes with a controller >> card whose driver is really only designed to be run on >> Windows, not Linux. > > Is this a *real* RAID controller or a 'fake' (BIOS/Software/MB) RAID > controller? If it is a real controller are you sure there is no Linux > driver for it? (Esp. since you are using Ubuntu!) If it is a > software/BIOS/MB RAID controller the performance is going to be really > bad -- these controllers are really only meant for home systems and > not > really for true servers. > >> >> >> I'd have to setup mdadm on Ubuntu, which I've done >> before and was not impressed. The Windows RAID system >> we have is much more easier to maintain. > > Oh, you mean you have to actually use your keyboard? How dreadfull... > > Do you mean to say that the files local to the Ubuntu *server* are not > on > a RAID array? > >> >> >> I don't want to get off topic here, I just want to >> know why Samba is giving me trouble browsing these >> mounted directories. > > This sort of 'game' (mounting files from one 'server' on another > server > and then re-exporting them), is not *specific* to Samba. See what > happens when you try to NFS export file systems mounted as nfs file > systems (although I expect nfsd/mountd would refuse to let you do that > in the first place). > > There are several problems: > > It tends to confuse the server(s). File serving software (Samba, > NFSD, > etc.) really expect the data they are serving to be local (yes, using > a > NAS or something like that is a little different) and are written to > optimal to work that way. > > It causes lots of network traffic: every I/O operation causes two > batches of network traffic and implies two sets of network channels: > one > set between the machine with the physical disks (the XP box) and the > 'server' (the Ubuntu box), and a *second* set of network channels > between the 'server' (the Ubuntu box) and the final client(s) (the > client MS-Windows machine(s)). If this is on one physical network (if > the 'server' (the Ubuntu box) only has one NIC), then the you have > lots > of network collisions, which means your network thoughput will truely > suck (eg network timeouts, dropped/lost packets, etc.). > > I expect that 'before' you 'got by' by luck. What might be happening > now is that some fix to Samba is biting you or maybe you are getting > network I/O errors (timeouts?) because of what I described in the > paragraph above. > > What you are doing is not really going to work in the long term. You > either need to: > > 1) Buy a real, supported RAID card for the Ubuntu system. > 2) Live with mdadm > 3) Pay for licenses for the XP system.Couldn't agree more. One more item is that the CIFS share to the XP box is the user that mounted the file system on Ubuntu. Bah! Just ugly all around.> > > > > -- > Robert Heller -- 978-544-6933 > Deepwoods Software -- Download the Model Railroad System > http://www.deepsoft.com/ -- Binaries for Linux and MS-Windows > heller at deepsoft.com -- > http://www.deepsoft.com/ModelRailroadSystem/ >
Leandro Tracchia
2010-Jul-09 17:15 UTC
[Samba] Problem After Upgrade - NT_STATUS_FILE_IS_A_DIRECTORY
> Debug level 10 logs are needed at this point to see what > the smbd is seeing when looking at the CIFS mounted files.Here is level 10 log of log.smbd that is generated when I experience the problem first described. [2010/07/09 12:48:25, 10] smbd/open.c:3365(create_file_default) create_file: access_mask = 0x20089 file_attributes = 0x80, share_access = 0x7, create_disposition = 0x1 create_options = 0x40 oplock_request = 0x3 root_dir_fid = 0x0, ea_list = 0x(nil), sd = 0x(nil), create_file_flags = 0x1, fname = RSA/Tables [2010/07/09 12:48:25, 5] smbd/filename.c:148(unix_convert) unix_convert called on file "RSA/Tables" [2010/07/09 12:48:25, 10] smbd/statcache.c:274(stat_cache_lookup) stat_cache_lookup: lookup succeeded for name [RSA/Tables] -> [RSA/Tables] [2010/07/09 12:48:25, 3] smbd/vfs.c:865(check_reduced_name) reduce_name [RSA/Tables] [/media/server/RSA] [2010/07/09 12:48:25, 10] smbd/vfs.c:937(check_reduced_name) reduce_name realpath [RSA/Tables] -> [/media/server/RSA/Tables] [2010/07/09 12:48:25, 3] smbd/vfs.c:974(check_reduced_name) reduce_name: RSA/Tables reduced to /media/server/RSA/Tables [2010/07/09 12:48:25, 10] smbd/open.c:2896(create_file_unixpath) create_file_unixpath: access_mask = 0x20089 file_attributes = 0x80, share_access = 0x7, create_disposition = 0x1 create_options = 0x40 oplock_request = 0x3 ea_list = 0x(nil), sd = 0x(nil), fname = RSA/Tables [2010/07/09 12:48:25, 5] smbd/files.c:103(file_new) allocated file structure 16108, fnum = 20204 (2 used) [2010/07/09 12:48:25, 2] smbd/dosmode.c:97(unix_mode) unix_mode(RSA/Tables) inheriting from RSA/Tables [2010/07/09 12:48:25, 2] smbd/dosmode.c:106(unix_mode) unix_mode(RSA/Tables) inherit mode 40770 [2010/07/09 12:48:25, 3] smbd/dosmode.c:149(unix_mode) unix_mode(RSA/Tables) returning 0760 [2010/07/09 12:48:25, 10] smbd/open.c:1475(open_file_ntcreate) open_file_ntcreate: fname=RSA/Tables, dos_attrs=0x80 access_mask=0x20089 share_access=0x7 create_disposition = 0x1 create_options=0x40 unix mode=0760 oplock_request=3 [2010/07/09 12:48:25, 3] smbd/vfs.c:865(check_reduced_name) reduce_name [RSA/Tables] [/media/server/RSA] [2010/07/09 12:48:25, 10] smbd/vfs.c:937(check_reduced_name) reduce_name realpath [RSA/Tables] -> [/media/server/RSA/Tables] [2010/07/09 12:48:25, 3] smbd/vfs.c:974(check_reduced_name) reduce_name: RSA/Tables reduced to /media/server/RSA/Tables [2010/07/09 12:48:25, 8] smbd/dosmode.c:494(dos_mode) dos_mode: RSA/Tables [2010/07/09 12:48:25, 8] smbd/dosmode.c:189(dos_mode_from_sbuf) dos_mode_from_sbuf returning d [2010/07/09 12:48:25, 8] smbd/dosmode.c:547(dos_mode) dos_mode returning d [2010/07/09 12:48:25, 10] smbd/open.c:1653(open_file_ntcreate) open_file_ntcreate: fname=RSA/Tables, after mapping access_mask=0x20089 [2010/07/09 12:48:25, 10] lib/dbwrap_tdb.c:100(db_tdb_fetch_locked) Locking key 15000000000000003909 [2010/07/09 12:48:25, 10] lib/dbwrap_tdb.c:129(db_tdb_fetch_locked) Allocated locked data 0x0x7f8390299d50 [2010/07/09 12:48:25, 10] smbd/open.c:980(delay_for_oplocks) delay_for_oplocks: oplock type 0x3 on file [2010/07/09 12:48:25, 10] smbd/open.c:980(delay_for_oplocks) delay_for_oplocks: oplock type 0x3 on file [2010/07/09 12:48:25, 4] smbd/open.c:1913(open_file_ntcreate) calling open_file with flags=0x0 flags2=0x0 mode=0760, access_mask = 0x20089, open_access_mask = 0x20089 [2010/07/09 12:48:25, 10] smbd/open.c:160(fd_open) fd_open: name RSA/Tables, flags = 00 mode = 0760, fd = 31. [2010/07/09 12:48:25, 10] locking/posix.c:495(get_windows_lock_ref_count) get_windows_lock_count for file = 0 [2010/07/09 12:48:25, 10] locking/posix.c:521(delete_windows_lock_ref_count) delete_windows_lock_ref_count for file [2010/07/09 12:48:25, 10] lib/dbwrap_tdb.c:42(db_tdb_record_destr) Unlocking key 15000000000000003909 [2010/07/09 12:48:25, 5] smbd/files.c:474(file_free) freed files structure 20204 (1 used) [2010/07/09 12:48:25, 10] smbd/open.c:3218(create_file_unixpath) create_file_unixpath: NT_STATUS_FILE_IS_A_DIRECTORY [2010/07/09 12:48:25, 10] smbd/open.c:3497(create_file_default) create_file: NT_STATUS_FILE_IS_A_DIRECTORY [2010/07/09 12:48:25, 3] smbd/error.c:60(error_packet_set) error packet at smbd/nttrans.c(563) cmd=162 (SMBntcreateX) NT_STATUS_FILE_IS_A_DIRECTORY [2010/07/09 12:48:25, 5] lib/util.c:632(show_msg) [2010/07/09 12:48:25, 5] lib/util.c:642(show_msg) size=35 smb_com=0xa2 smb_rcls=186 smb_reh=0 smb_err=49152 smb_flg=136 smb_flg2=51201 smb_tid=4 smb_pid=5696 smb_uid=100 smb_mid=62275 smt_wct=0 smb_bcc=0 [2010/07/09 12:48:25, 10] lib/util_sock.c:789(read_smb_length_return_keepalive) got smb length of 176 [2010/07/09 12:48:25, 6] smbd/process.c:1456(process_smb) got message type 0x0 of len 0xb0 [2010/07/09 12:48:25, 3] smbd/process.c:1459(process_smb) Transaction 1680202 of length 180 (0 toread) [2010/07/09 12:48:25, 5] lib/util.c:632(show_msg) [2010/07/09 12:48:25, 5] lib/util.c:642(show_msg) size=176 smb_com=0xa2 smb_rcls=0 smb_reh=0 smb_err=0 smb_flg=24 smb_flg2=51207 smb_tid=4 smb_pid=5696 smb_uid=100 smb_mid=62339 smt_wct=24 smb_vwv[ 0]= 255 (0xFF) smb_vwv[ 1]=57054 (0xDEDE) smb_vwv[ 2]=23040 (0x5A00) smb_vwv[ 3]= 5632 (0x1600) smb_vwv[ 4]= 0 (0x0) smb_vwv[ 5]= 0 (0x0) smb_vwv[ 6]= 0 (0x0) smb_vwv[ 7]=35072 (0x8900) smb_vwv[ 8]= 512 (0x200) smb_vwv[ 9]= 0 (0x0) smb_vwv[10]= 0 (0x0) smb_vwv[11]= 0 (0x0) smb_vwv[12]= 0 (0x0) smb_vwv[13]= 0 (0x0) smb_vwv[14]= 0 (0x0) smb_vwv[15]= 1792 (0x700) smb_vwv[16]= 0 (0x0) smb_vwv[17]= 256 (0x100) smb_vwv[18]= 0 (0x0) smb_vwv[19]= 0 (0x0) smb_vwv[20]= 0 (0x0) smb_vwv[21]= 512 (0x200) smb_vwv[22]= 0 (0x0) smb_vwv[23]= 768 (0x300) smb_bcc=93 [2010/07/09 12:48:25, 10] ../lib/util/util.c:304(_dump_data) [0000] 00 5C 00 52 00 65 00 64 00 53 00 74 00 6F 00 6E .\.R.e.d .S.t.o.n [0010] 00 65 00 20 00 41 00 72 00 73 00 65 00 6E 00 61 .e. .A.r .s.e.n.a [0020] 00 6C 00 5C 00 4C 00 65 00 65 00 20 00 4D 00 61 .l.\.L.e .e. .M.a [0030] 00 6E 00 73 00 69 00 6F 00 6E 00 20 00 50 00 68 .n.s.i.o .n. .P.h [0040] 00 61 00 73 00 65 00 20 00 49 00 49 00 5C 00 54 .a.s.e. .I.I.\.T [0050] 00 61 00 62 00 6C 00 65 00 73 00 00 00 .a.b.l.e .s... [2010/07/09 12:48:25, 3] smbd/process.c:1273(switch_message) switch message SMBntcreateX (pid 15334) conn 0x7f83902e6fe0 [2010/07/09 12:48:25, 4] smbd/uid.c:256(change_to_user) change_to_user: Skipping user change - already user [2010/07/09 12:48:25, 10] smbd/nttrans.c:484(reply_ntcreate_and_X) reply_ntcreate_and_X: flags = 0x16, access_mask = 0x20089 file_attributes = 0x0, share_access = 0x7, create_disposition = 0x1 create_options = 0x0 root_dir_fid = 0x0, fname = RSA/Tables [2010/07/09 12:48:25, 10] smbd/open.c:3365(create_file_default) create_file: access_mask = 0x20089 file_attributes = 0x0, share_access = 0x7, create_disposition = 0x1 create_options = 0x0 oplock_request = 0x3 root_dir_fid = 0x0, ea_list = 0x(nil), sd = 0x(nil), create_file_flags = 0x1, fname = RSA/Tables [2010/07/09 12:48:25, 5] smbd/filename.c:148(unix_convert) unix_convert called on file "RSA/Tables" [2010/07/09 12:48:25, 10] smbd/statcache.c:274(stat_cache_lookup) stat_cache_lookup: lookup succeeded for name [RSA/Tables] -> [RSA/Tables] [2010/07/09 12:48:25, 3] smbd/vfs.c:865(check_reduced_name) reduce_name [RSA/Tables] [/media/server/RSA] [2010/07/09 12:48:25, 10] smbd/vfs.c:937(check_reduced_name) reduce_name realpath [RSA/Tables] -> [/media/server/RSA/Tables] [2010/07/09 12:48:25, 3] smbd/vfs.c:974(check_reduced_name) reduce_name: RSA/Tables reduced to /media/server/RSA/Tables [2010/07/09 12:48:25, 10] smbd/open.c:2896(create_file_unixpath) create_file_unixpath: access_mask = 0x20089 file_attributes = 0x0, share_access = 0x7, create_disposition = 0x1 create_options = 0x0 oplock_request = 0x3 ea_list = 0x(nil), sd = 0x(nil), fname = RSA/Tables [2010/07/09 12:48:25, 5] smbd/files.c:103(file_new) allocated file structure 16109, fnum = 20205 (2 used) [2010/07/09 12:48:25, 2] smbd/dosmode.c:97(unix_mode) unix_mode(RSA/Tables) inheriting from RSA/Tables [2010/07/09 12:48:25, 2] smbd/dosmode.c:106(unix_mode) unix_mode(RSA/Tables) inherit mode 40770 [2010/07/09 12:48:25, 3] smbd/dosmode.c:149(unix_mode) unix_mode(RSA/Tables) returning 0760 [2010/07/09 12:48:25, 10] smbd/open.c:1475(open_file_ntcreate) open_file_ntcreate: fname=RSA/Tables, dos_attrs=0x0 access_mask=0x20089 share_access=0x7 create_disposition = 0x1 create_options=0x0 unix mode=0760 oplock_request=3 [2010/07/09 12:48:25, 3] smbd/vfs.c:865(check_reduced_name) reduce_name [RSA/Tables] [/media/server/RSA] [2010/07/09 12:48:25, 10] smbd/vfs.c:937(check_reduced_name) reduce_name realpath [RSA/Tables] -> [/media/server/RSA/Tables] [2010/07/09 12:48:25, 3] smbd/vfs.c:974(check_reduced_name) reduce_name: RSA/Tables reduced to /media/server/RSA/Tables [2010/07/09 12:48:25, 8] smbd/dosmode.c:494(dos_mode) dos_mode: RSA/Tables [2010/07/09 12:48:25, 8] smbd/dosmode.c:189(dos_mode_from_sbuf) dos_mode_from_sbuf returning d [2010/07/09 12:48:25, 8] smbd/dosmode.c:547(dos_mode) dos_mode returning d [2010/07/09 12:48:25, 10] smbd/open.c:1653(open_file_ntcreate) open_file_ntcreate: fname=RSA/Tables, after mapping access_mask=0x20089 [2010/07/09 12:48:25, 10] lib/dbwrap_tdb.c:100(db_tdb_fetch_locked) Locking key 15000000000000003909 [2010/07/09 12:48:25, 10] lib/dbwrap_tdb.c:129(db_tdb_fetch_locked) Allocated locked data 0x0x7f8390299d50 [2010/07/09 12:48:25, 10] smbd/open.c:980(delay_for_oplocks) delay_for_oplocks: oplock type 0x3 on file [2010/07/09 12:48:25, 10] smbd/open.c:980(delay_for_oplocks) delay_for_oplocks: oplock type 0x3 on file [2010/07/09 12:48:25, 4] smbd/open.c:1913(open_file_ntcreate) calling open_file with flags=0x0 flags2=0x0 mode=0760, access_mask = 0x20089, open_access_mask = 0x20089 [2010/07/09 12:48:25, 10] smbd/open.c:160(fd_open) fd_open: name RSA/Tables, flags = 00 mode = 0760, fd = 31. [2010/07/09 12:48:25, 10] locking/posix.c:495(get_windows_lock_ref_count) get_windows_lock_count for file = 0 [2010/07/09 12:48:25, 10] locking/posix.c:521(delete_windows_lock_ref_count) delete_windows_lock_ref_count for file [2010/07/09 12:48:25, 10] lib/dbwrap_tdb.c:42(db_tdb_record_destr) Unlocking key 15000000000000003909 [2010/07/09 12:48:25, 5] smbd/files.c:474(file_free) freed files structure 20205 (1 used) [2010/07/09 12:48:25, 5] smbd/open.c:2391(open_directory) open_directory: opening directory RSA/Tables, access_mask = 0x20089, share_access = 0x7 create_options = 0x0, create_disposition = 0x1, file_attributes = 0x0 [2010/07/09 12:48:25, 10] smbd/posix_acls.c:3372(posix_get_nt_acl) posix_get_nt_acl: called for file RSA/Tables [2010/07/09 12:48:25, 10] smbd/posix_acls.c:2522(canonicalise_acl) canonicalise_acl: Access ace entries before arrange : [2010/07/09 12:48:25, 10] smbd/posix_acls.c:2535(canonicalise_acl) canon_ace index 0. Type = allow SID = S-1-1-0 other SMB_ACL_OTHER ace_flags = 0x0 perms --- [2010/07/09 12:48:25, 10] smbd/posix_acls.c:2535(canonicalise_acl) canon_ace index 1. Type = allow SID = S-1-5-21-2665625993-2077132221-1624687091-3037 gid 1018 (editors) SMB_ACL_GROUP_OBJ ace_flags = 0x0 perms rwx [2010/07/09 12:48:25, 10] smbd/posix_acls.c:2535(canonicalise_acl) canon_ace index 2. Type = allow SID = S-1-5-21-2665625993-2077132221-1624687091-1000 uid 0 (root) SMB_ACL_USER_OBJ ace_flags = 0x0 perms rwx [2010/07/09 12:48:25, 10] smbd/posix_acls.c:838(print_canon_ace_list) print_canon_ace_list: canonicalise_acl: ace entries after arrange canon_ace index 0. Type = allow SID = S-1-5-21-2665625993-2077132221-1624687091-1000 uid 0 (root) SMB_ACL_USER_OBJ ace_flags = 0x0 perms rwx canon_ace index 1. Type = allow SID = S-1-5-21-2665625993-2077132221-1624687091-3037 gid 1018 (editors) SMB_ACL_GROUP_OBJ ace_flags = 0x0 perms rwx canon_ace index 2. Type = allow SID = S-1-1-0 other SMB_ACL_OTHER ace_flags = 0x0 perms --- [2010/07/09 12:48:25, 10] smbd/posix_acls.c:1116(map_canon_ace_perms) map_canon_ace_perms: Mapped (UNIX) 1c0 to (NT) 1f01ff [2010/07/09 12:48:25, 10] smbd/posix_acls.c:1116(map_canon_ace_perms) map_canon_ace_perms: Mapped (UNIX) 1c0 to (NT) 1f01ff [2010/07/09 12:48:25, 10] smbd/posix_acls.c:1116(map_canon_ace_perms) map_canon_ace_perms: Mapped (UNIX) 0 to (NT) 0 [2010/07/09 12:48:25, 10] smbd/open.c:113(check_open_rights) check_open_rights: file RSA/Tables requesting 0x20089 returning 0x20009 (NT_STATUS_OK) [2010/07/09 12:48:25, 5] smbd/files.c:103(file_new) allocated file structure 16110, fnum = 20206 (2 used) [2010/07/09 12:48:25, 10] lib/dbwrap_tdb.c:100(db_tdb_fetch_locked) Locking key 15000000000000003909 [2010/07/09 12:48:25, 10] lib/dbwrap_tdb.c:129(db_tdb_fetch_locked) Allocated locked data 0x0x7f839029add0 [2010/07/09 12:48:25, 10] locking/locking.c:716(unparse_share_modes) unparse_share_modes: del: 0, owrt: Fri May 1 10:32:46 2009 EDT cwrt: Wed Dec 31 19:00:00 1969 EST, tok: 0, num: 1 [2010/07/09 12:48:25, 10] locking/locking.c:518(print_share_mode_table) print_share_mode_table: share_mode_entry[0]: pid = 15334, share_access = 0x7, private_options = 0x0, access_mask = 0x20089, mid = 0x0, type= 0x0, gen_id = 28771, uid = 1020, flags = 0, file_id 15:1000000000939:0 [2010/07/09 12:48:25, 10] lib/dbwrap_tdb.c:42(db_tdb_record_destr) Unlocking key 15000000000000003909 [2010/07/09 12:48:25, 10] smbd/open.c:3201(create_file_unixpath) create_file_unixpath: info=1 [2010/07/09 12:48:25, 10] smbd/open.c:3485(create_file_default) create_file: info=1 [2010/07/09 12:48:25, 8] smbd/dosmode.c:494(dos_mode) dos_mode: RSA/Tables [2010/07/09 12:48:25, 8] smbd/dosmode.c:189(dos_mode_from_sbuf) dos_mode_from_sbuf returning d [2010/07/09 12:48:25, 8] smbd/dosmode.c:547(dos_mode) dos_mode returning d [2010/07/09 12:48:25, 5] smbd/nttrans.c:672(reply_ntcreate_and_X) reply_ntcreate_and_X: fnum = 20206, open name = RSA/Tables [2010/07/09 12:48:25, 10] lib/util_sock.c:789(read_smb_length_return_keepalive) got smb length of 72 [2010/07/09 12:48:25, 6] smbd/process.c:1456(process_smb) got message type 0x0 of len 0x48 [2010/07/09 12:48:25, 3] smbd/process.c:1459(process_smb) Transaction 1680203 of length 76 (0 toread) [2010/07/09 12:48:25, 5] lib/util.c:632(show_msg) [2010/07/09 12:48:25, 5] lib/util.c:642(show_msg) size=72 smb_com=0x32 smb_rcls=0 smb_reh=0 smb_err=0 smb_flg=24 smb_flg2=51207 smb_tid=4 smb_pid=5696 smb_uid=100 smb_mid=62403 smt_wct=15 smb_vwv[ 0]= 4 (0x4) smb_vwv[ 1]= 0 (0x0) smb_vwv[ 2]= 2 (0x2) smb_vwv[ 3]= 8 (0x8) smb_vwv[ 4]= 0 (0x0) smb_vwv[ 5]= 0 (0x0) smb_vwv[ 6]= 0 (0x0) smb_vwv[ 7]= 0 (0x0) smb_vwv[ 8]= 0 (0x0) smb_vwv[ 9]= 4 (0x4) smb_vwv[10]= 68 (0x44) smb_vwv[11]= 0 (0x0) smb_vwv[12]= 0 (0x0) smb_vwv[13]= 1 (0x1) smb_vwv[14]= 7 (0x7) smb_bcc=7