search for: access_mask

...E_FLAG_INHERITED_ACE 0x0a: SEC_ACE_FLAG_VALID_INHERIT (10) 1: SEC_ACE_FLAG_SUCCESSFUL_ACCESS 0: SEC_ACE_FLAG_FAILED_ACCESS size : 0x0038 (56) access_mask : 0x00000020 (32) object : union security_ace_object_ctr(case 7) object: struct security_ace_object flags : 0x00000003 (3) 1: SEC_ACE_OBJE...

I've been been trying to investigate this for sometime now, hence I came to the experts :) I have rejoined all my DC's with new names, see below. ;; ANSWER SECTION: <domain>.corp. 3600 IN NS psad101zatcrh.<domain>.corp. -> New rebuild, new hostname, RHEL6 to RHEL7 upgrade <domain>.corp. 3600 IN NS prdc001zafsrh.<domain>.corp. -> New

...0x03 (3) 1: SEC_ACE_FLAG_OBJECT_INHERIT 1: SEC_ACE_FLAG_CONTAINER_INHERIT 0: SEC_ACE_FLAG_NO_PROPAGATE_INHERIT 0: SEC_ACE_FLAG_INHERIT_ONLY 0: SEC_ACE_FLAG_INHERITED_ACE 0x03: SEC_ACE_FLAG_VALID_INHERIT (3) 0: SEC_ACE_FLAG_SUCCESSFUL_ACCESS 0: SEC_ACE_FLAG_FAILED_ACCESS size: 0x0024 (36) access_mask: 0x001f01ff (2032127) object: union security_ace_object_ctr(case 0) trustee: S-1-5-21-940051827-2291820289-3341758437-512 aces: struct security_ace type: SEC_ACE_TYPE_ACCESS_ALLOWED (0) flags: 0x03 (3) 1: SEC_ACE_FLAG_OBJECT_INHERIT 1: SEC_ACE_FLAG_CONTAINER_INHERIT 0: SEC_ACE_FLAG_NO_PROPA...

Am 5/9/20 um 3:32 PM schrieb Ralph Boehme via samba: > I have a WIP fix for master, can you give it a whirl? here it is. -slow -- Ralph Boehme, Samba Team https://samba.org/ Samba Developer, SerNet GmbH https://sernet.de/en/samba/ GPG-Fingerprint FAE2C6088A24252051C559E4AA1E9B7126399E46 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name:

...E > ???????????????????????????0x03: SEC_ACE_FLAG_VALID_INHERIT (3) > ??????????????????????????????0: SEC_ACE_FLAG_SUCCESSFUL_ACCESS > ??????????????????????????????0: SEC_ACE_FLAG_FAILED_ACCESS > ???????????????????????size ????????????????????: 0x0014 (20) > ???????????????????????access_mask ?????????????: 0x00000000 (0) > ???????????????????????object ??????????????????: union > security_ace_object_ctr(case 0) > ???????????????????????trustee ?????????????????: S-1-1-0 > ???????????????????aces: struct security_ace > ???????????????????????type ????????????????????: &...

On 11/04/2023 13:36, Gary Dale via samba wrote: > On 2023-04-11 04:15, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: >> >> >> What 'Debian distribution-specific' installation did you follow ? > The one linked to in AD DC wiki. Where abouts is this link ? I checked here: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setting_up_Samba_as_an_Active_Directory_Domain_Controller But couldn't

..._posixacl.c:89 (posixacl_sys_acl_set_file) Calling acl_set_file: test-dir, 0 [2011/05/26 15:27:02.144762, 10] modules/vfs_posixacl.c:108 (posixacl_sys_acl_set_file) acl_set_file failed: Operation not permitted [2011/05/26 15:27:02.144815, 10] smbd/open.c:3381(create_file_default) create_file: access_mask = 0x2 file_attributes = 0x0, share_access = 0x7, create_disposition = 0x1 create_options = 0x0 oplock_request = 0x8 root_dir_fid = 0x0, ea_list = 0x(nil), sd = 0x(nil), fname = test-dir [2011/05/26 15:27:02.144863, 3] smbd/vfs.c:881(check_reduced_name) check_reduced_name [test-dir] [/srv/samba...

...iles/folders along with their security settings. The restore is now broken because security settings cannot be restored any more. I have enabled samba loglevel 10 . I see the problem is coming here. ---------- 2011/01/26 10:41:04, 10] smbd/open.c:2896(create_file_unixpath) create_file_unixpath: access_mask = 0x11e019f file_attributes = 0x80, share_access = 0x3, create_disposition = 0x1 create_options = 0x4004 oplock_request = 0x0 ea_list = 0x(nil), sd = 0x(nil), fname = Share2/file2.txt -------------- SEC_FLAG_SYSTEM_SECURITY is 0x01000000 /* We need to support SeSecurityPrivilege for this. */...

Is behavior of ACLs under Samba 3.3.0 (Sernet) completely different from that under version 3.2.7? The release notes only talks about some "fixes". I installed version 3.3.0 and got completely different result with the same filesystem and the exact same samba configuration. The ACLs behaved strangely and appeared very different under Windows ACL editor. Users were now unable to

...But when I try to create the file I get: New file New Text Document (2).txt unix_mode(New Text Document (2).txt) inheriting from . unix_mode(New Text Document (2).txt) inherit mode 42770 unix_mode(New Text Document.txt) returning 0760 open_file_ntcreate: fname=New Text Document.txt, dos_attrs=0x80 access_mask=0x2019f share_access=0x7 create_disposition = 0x2 create_options=0x40 unix mode=0760 oplock_request=3 open_file_ntcreate: fname=New Text Document.txt, after mapping access_mask=0x2019f allocated file structure 2723, fnum = 6819 (2 used) calling open_file with flags=0x2 flags2=0x80 mode=0777, access...

I need to temporarily disable a share for a few days, I remember there was an entry I could add to the share definition to temporarily disable the share (I think it was disabled=true or enabled=false) but I can't remember what it was for sure, nor can I find it in the manual. what is it ?

...ffffffffffd378), line 1329 in "vfs_default.c" smb_vfs_call_get_nt_acl(handle = 0x0000000100104eac, name = "", security_info = 268435455, ppdesc = 0x09001000a00800b8), line 1754 in "vfs.c" smbd_check_open_rights(conn = 0x0000000110155aa0, smb_fname = 0x000000011015c290, access_mask = 16777216, access_granted = 0x0010008000100080), line 115 in "open.c" open_directory(conn = 0x0000000110155aa0, req = 0x000000011015c140, smb_dname = 0x000000011015c290, access_mask = 1048704, share_access = 0, create_disposition = 1, create_options = 8388609, file_attributes = 16, pinfo...

I have an intermittent problem with dangling MS Access DB lock files. In a productive environment with N batch queus (each on a separate Windows XP Professional) a scheduler PC dispatches the work load to a free queue by means of modifying a simple MS Access DB file called "PRIM.mdb", which resides on a Samba 3.0.20 share. Each free queue PC polls the same MS Access DB file every 60

Server - Samba 3.0.20 on INTEL P4 running Slackware 10.1 Client - Windows 98. Can log in, see, browse, and write. Just can't run simultaneous, same *.exe from 2 different computers with Windows 98 With Windows 2000, Xp this keep good time. On samba 3.0.14a, with same smb.conf this problem dont exist.

..., pid=25525, effective(1248, 1012), real(0, 0)] share_conflict: [6] am (0x100081) & right (0x10000) = 0x0 share_conflict: [6] sa (0x7) & share (0x4) = 0x4 share_conflict: No conflict. [2014/10/08 01:44:51.341157, 10, pid=25524, effective(1248, 1012), real(0, 0)] share_conflict: entry->access_mask = 0x100080, entry->share_access = 0x0, entry->private_options = 0x0 [2014/10/08 01:44:51.341223, 10, pid=25524, effective(1248, 1012), real(0, 0)] share_conflict: access_mask = 0x100081, share_access = 0x7 [2014/10/08 01:44:51.341284, 10, pid=25524, effective(1248, 1012), real(0, 0)] share_...

...s. This is remeniscent of the 3.0.23b SID/GID problem. The only thing that jumps out at me is that you can't access your home share and other shares just quit working. Looking at the log files, I see this: [2007/05/14 15:24:55, 10] smbd/open.c:share_conflict(389) share_conflict: entry->access_mask = 0x100001, entry->share_access = 0x7, entry->private_options = 0x1 [2007/05/14 15:24:55, 10] smbd/open.c:share_conflict(392) share_conflict: access_mask = 0x81, share_access = 0x3 [2007/05/14 15:24:55, 10] smbd/open.c:share_conflict(441) share_conflict: [1] am (0x100001) & right (0x...

I'm running Samba 3.4.7 on Ubuntu 10.04. This is a recent upgrade and we've starting experience a sporadic problem after this upgrade. When users are browsing through Windows Explorer they sometimes run across folders that appear as unassociated files. This requires the user to click the 'Refresh' button in Windows Explorer to properly see the folders. The files and folders are

...2008/08/15 12:25:22, 5] smbd/filename.c:unix_convert(440) New file ntuser.man [2008/08/15 12:25:22, 3] smbd/dosmode.c:unix_mode(142) unix_mode(jdoe/ntuser.man) returning 0700 [2008/08/15 12:25:22, 10] smbd/open.c:open_file_ntcreate(1184) open_file_ntcreate: fname=jdoe/ntuser.man, dos_attrs=0x0 access_mask=0x1 share_access=0x7 create_disposition = 0x1 create_options=0x140 unix mode=0700 oplock_request=3 [2008/08/15 12:25:22, 5] smbd/open.c:open_file_ntcreate(1264) open_file_ntcreate: FILE_OPEN requested for file jdoe/ntuser.man and file doesn't exist. [2008/08/15 12:25:22, 3] smbd/error.c:error...

Maybe I'm doing somthing really stupid, but while copying some windows share onto a samba server, on some random subdirectory robocopy says ERROR 87 (0x00000057) Copying NTFS Security to Destination Directory... The samba logfile has lots of these lines. modules/vfs_posixacl.c:349(smb_acl_to_posix) smb_acl_to_posix: ACL is invalid for set (Das Argument ist ung?ltig) The strange thing is

...aking changes, it is not possible to save using the same file name however a different name needs specifying (save as). In smbd.log I see some of the following, sanitised: Works:- [2012/12/19 22:10:48, 4] smbd/open.c:open_file_ntcreate(1605) calling open_file with flags=0x2 flags2=0x0 mode=0744, access_mask = 0x20196, open_access_mask = 0x20196 [2012/12/19 22:10:48, 2] smbd/open.c:open_file(391) USER opened file FILE read=No write=Yes (numopen=2) Doesn't work:- [2012/12/19 22:10:48, 3] smbd/vfs.c:reduce_name(922) reduce_name: FILE reduced to /path/FILE [2012/12/19 22:10:48, 4] smbd/open.c:ope...