Pablo Chamorro C.
2006-Sep-07 03:12 UTC
[Samba] update from 3.0.23b-1 to 3.0.23c - smbpasswd backend
I installed a PDC some days ago for some 15 users/PCs (w98,2000,xp), with samba 3.0.23b-1 and valid users wasn't working. I'm going to update to 3.0.23c which solves that problem. I'm using smbpasswd passdb backend. In /etc/group I have only two groups. I don't understand very well the changes related to primaryGroupSID and RID commented in previous posts. Please, is it enough to do an rpm -Uvh samba*rpm? (samba samba-client, samba-common)? I apreciate any comment. Thanks, Pablo -- Ext. 8705 (provisional: 2188) Tel: +57 (2) 7314752/3222/2595 - Fax: +57 (2) 7310514 Carrera 31 #18-07 Parque Infantil - PO Box 1795 - Pasto
Gerald (Jerry) Carter
2006-Sep-07 12:20 UTC
[Samba] update from 3.0.23b-1 to 3.0.23c - smbpasswd backend
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Pablo Chamorro C. wrote:> I installed a PDC some days ago for some 15 users/PCs (w98,2000,xp), > with samba 3.0.23b-1 and valid users wasn't working. I'm going to > update to 3.0.23c which solves that problem. I'm using smbpasswd passdb > backend. In /etc/group I have only two groups. > > I don't understand very well the changes related to primaryGroupSID and > RID commented in previous posts. Please, is it enough to do an rpm -Uvh > samba*rpm? (samba samba-client, samba-common)? I apreciate any comment.Yes. The changes should be transparent for most servers. cheers, jerry ====================================================================Samba ------- http://www.samba.org Centeris ----------- http://www.centeris.com "What man is a man who does not make the world better?" --Balian -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFAA5GIR7qMdg1EfYRAi38AKDJUp4p5CIKc7l+9JBs8X3Vx/qPOgCg1ZnO L6tkM+ic/73Ooe9xfCfzUx8=+PI7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----