Displaying 20 results from an estimated 200 matches similar to: "update from 3.0.23b-1 to 3.0.23c - smbpasswd backend"
2005 May 17
1
Group SID problems?
Have a site where the network users are connecting to most shares through
group usage. Unfortunately, access to Samba is sporadic. Sometimes they
connect okay, sometimes they can't connect at all.
Looking at their system config, I notice that the SID's for the groups
look..... odd. The users group ends in 3005.... but each user's
PrimaryGroupSID is a group with a SID that ends in
2007 Jan 09
1
migrate old samba2.2.8 - smbpasswd to new samba3.0 - ldap - based
I'm just migrating a medium sambainstallation from old samba2.2.8 to new samba
3.0. The server is acting as PDC and there is no BDC.
The new samba is based on LDAP and is already successfully tested. Now I need to
transfer the whole old smbpasswd to the new ldap-style to convert users and
machines with minimal effort. Especially I dont want to break the relations
between the machines and
2004 Jan 30
0
[PATCH] Group mapping primary group SID update
Hi all !
This is a patch for Group mapping bug #1 reported here :
http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/2004-January/034057.html
It activates users' primary group SID update when adding/modifying/deleting a
group mapping. It patches utils/net_groupmap.c (net_groupmap_add,
net_groupmap_modify, net_groupmap_delete) and can be applied to samba-3.0.2rc1.
net_groupmap_add :
Scan users
2006 Sep 02
2
Local groups invisible (ldapsam & 3.0.23b, 3.0.23c)
Hello all,
I'm running samba3 as domain controller.
I have upgraded samba from 3.0.22 to 3.0.23b and faced an issue
with groups display: samba does not see any groups.
"net rpc group -U Administrator" returns empty set.
usrmgr.exe does not show any groups also.
Groups are present in ldap, nss_ldap works fine:
# id asv
uid=2005(asv) gid=513(Domain Users) groups=513(Domain Users),
2006 Sep 11
2
3.0.23b -> 3.0.23c
I portupgraded my working 3.0.23b PDC on FreeBSD 5.5 to 3.0.23c and found
that all workstations could not login. The log file reads:
get_md4pw: Workstation PC01$: no account in domain
I ran pdbedit -L, and it returned nothing. I use tdbsam backend; all user
accounts show up fine with 3.0.23b. Now they are missing. I deinstalled
3.0.23c and switched back to 3.0.23b. Everything is then back
2004 Jul 14
1
WG: Re: sambaAcctFlags automatically DUX when logon
-----Ursprungliche Nachricht-----
Von: Marian Chowanetz [mailto:mchowanetz@emmixx.de]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 14. Juli 2004 10:24
An: 'Jim C.'
Betreff: AW: [Samba] Re: sambaAcctFlags automatically DUX when logon
thanks for your help, jim.
I'd already tried the re-joining with my test-machine. It didn't help.
I found out that the idxldapaccounts-tool does not correctly change the
2009 Sep 21
1
No Admin-Rights in SMB-PDC-Domain
Hello,
I've build a domain with Samba 3.0.23 and sucessfully joined this domain
with a Windows-XP-Machine. I can log in to that machine as User "Root",
wich is in the Group "Domain Admins" (rid=512). But I have no
admin-rights on that machine.
Also, normal User can not log in over the Remotesession (RDP).
Can anybody help me to figure out why?
Here is my smb.conf:
2006 Aug 18
1
3.0.23b binaries for debian/sarge please
Hi,
Cannot spot the debian binaries for 3.0.23b - please please please as
3.0.23a has some issues regarding domain users and I'm too lazy to compile
my own packages
Thanks,
--
DanB
2006 Aug 25
1
Concern about 3.0.22->3.0.23b upgrade (algorithmic SIDs issue)
I'm compiling samba-3.0.23b as I write this. However, after studying the
documentation, I have some serious concerns about installing it.
The WHATSNEW file says that the method of mapping unix-native uids and
gids to SIDs has changed since 3.0.22. As I read this, this would imply
that upgrading Samba will cause much breakage because domain users will no
longer be able to access files they
2006 Aug 11
2
Debian 3.0.23b tbdsam guest panic
Hi All,
Just upgraded a test box to 3.0.23b and discovered some changes that cause a
panic.
I had an smb.conf with passdb backend = tbdsam guest
The guest bit now causes panic action.
log.smbd complains ... "No builtin nor plugin backend for tdbsam guest found"
Either the build options have changed or the guest operative has issues.
Works OK without guest, but it's been
2006 Aug 10
4
FW: HELP -- Problem with access list on samba 3.0.23b but not on 3.0.20c PDC
-----Original Message-----
From: M. D. Parker [mailto:mike.parker@ga.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2006 9:02 AM
To: 'samba@lists.samba.org'
Subject: HELP -- Problem with access list on samba 3.0.23b but not on
3.0.20c PDC
I am using samba with NO windbind and a configuration file that has worked
for years stopped working at 3.0.23b. The affect was that my [netlogon]
area was not being
2006 Aug 08
0
Samba 3.0.23b Available for Download
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
==============================================================
"Where does he get those wonders toys?"
-- The Joker (Batman 1989)
==============================================================
Release Announcements
=====================
This is the latest stable release of Samba. This is
2006 Aug 23
2
3.0.23b domain member not accessible
I portupgraded my samba domain server and domain member to 3.0.23b from
3.0.23 and found that the domain member was not accessible from
workstations. The error message:
\\HOSTNAME is not accessible.
There are currently no logon servers available to service the logon request.
In the log.winbindd of the domain member, I found:
[2006/08/23 22:52:00, 0] nsswitch/winbindd.c:request_len_recv(517)
2008 Jun 30
0
Solaris blastwave.org Version 3.0.23b doesn't read new information from /etc/passwd and /etc/group
Hi,
How would I make samba re-read group and user information? Is there a .tdb file that needs to be deleted?
I have recently added more supplementary groups for a user in /etc/group, but the information isn't coming through in the logs, all I get is this:
[2008/06/27 07:51:24, 5] auth/auth_util.c:(474)
UNIX token of user 11001
Primary group is 11000 and contains 0 supplementary groups
2004 Nov 16
4
Samba/Netscape Directory Server
For whatever reason I am trying to configure the following environment
and am running into trouble towards the end of things. Hopefully I am
overlooking something basic, any assistance would be greatly appreciated.
1. Redhat AS 2.1 server running Netscape Directory Server 5.2
2. RHEL3 system using Samba 3.0.8 acting as a PDC integrated with the
Netscape LDAP server
3. Win2k/XP clients as
2013 Mar 29
1
Create values based on a table of conditions
Hi R help forum,
I have a simple data frame of four columns - one of numbers (really a
categorical variable), one of dates and one
of data. I have over 500,000 data points to work with, spread over 40
files, each named after a different animal.
These are contact data recorded by proximity loggers over two years
between the animals of the file name and
collars being worn by other animals. The
2006 Aug 18
8
Strange Usermapping problem with 3.0.23b
Yesterday evening I upgraded my FreeBSD 5.5-RELEASE Server from Samba
3.0.22 to 3.0.23. This gave me a LOT of work today... :-(
This is what I found so far:
My Samba-Server is member of a large ADS-Domain. After the upgrade,
file based Usermapping didn't work anymore... better: it worked TWICE.
(I once opened a PR for that a few years ago :-). So, with LogLevel 3:
2006 Aug 08
5
Samba 3.0.23b Available for Download
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
==============================================================
"Where does he get those wonders toys?"
-- The Joker (Batman 1989)
==============================================================
Release Announcements
=====================
This is the latest stable release of Samba. This is
2004 Oct 12
3
Group membership
I am using Samba PDC with OpenLDAP2 and smbldap-tools. As part of my
logon.bat, I call a script called ifmember.exe. This script can list out the
groups a user is a member of. It is reporting that my root user is a member
of the group 'engr.' I don't know if this is a bug with ifmember.exe or if
it's an issue in Samba or in LDAP. Here is some relevant data:
2013 Apr 26
2
Remove reciprocal data from a grouped animal social contact dataset
Hi r-help forum,
I have been collecting contact data (with proximity logger collars)
between a few different species of animal. All animals wear the
collars, and any contact between the animals should be detected and
recorded by both collars. However, this isn't always the case and more
contacts may be recorded on one collar of the two. This is fine, it
depends on battery life and other